UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment

(Amendment No. )

 

Filed by the Registrant

Filed by the Registrant  ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

Check

Confidential, for Use of the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement
CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULECommission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12§240.14a-12

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

 

LOGO

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:

Cover photo courtesy of Barons Farnborough BMW

Farnborough, United Kingdom

 

 

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.


LOGO


LOGO

 Dear Fellow Shareholder

We are pleased to invite you to attend Group 1 Automotive’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held virtually on Wednesday, May 18, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. Central Daylight Saving Time. Please see the Notice of Annual Meeting for more information on how to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting.

OVERVIEW

Fiscal year 2021 was another record year for Group 1 Automotive. Despite the ongoing pandemic and well documented supply-chain disruptions, we were able to achieve significant growth in most of our financial metrics.

Key accomplishments included: (i) revenue of $13.8 billion, an increase of 27%, (ii) adjusted earnings per share of $35.02, an increase of 94%, (iii) adjusted net income of $642 million, an increase of 93%, and (iv) $755.5 million adjusted operating cash flow, an increase of 50%(1). These results were attributable to expanded margins in our new and used vehicle sales, continued growth in our aftersales and finance and insurance businesses, and strong cost control. As a result of our 2021 financial performance, the Company generated strong cash flow which allowed us to grow the business by acquisitions as well as the repurchase of approximately 6% of our shares.

The Company completed major acquisitions in both our U.S. and U.K. markets in 2021, resulting in an increase in our total dealership count as of December 31, 2021 to 218 from 184 at year-end 2020. The Company increased its footprint in the northeast United States with the acquisition of 33 dealerships, further diversifying our geographic footprint in the United States. In the United Kingdom, the Company added additional scale with the acquisition of 7 dealerships. These transactions represented, in the aggregate, $2.5 billion of annualized revenues. The Company also announced the divesture of our Brazilian operations with an expected closing date in the second quarter of 2022.

INITIATIVES

In 2021, we continued our work to prepare for increasing sales volumes of alternative fuel and electric vehicles (“EV”) by working with local utility companies and auto manufacturers to increase vehicle charging capacity. We also made additional investments in EV service equipment and training for our employees.

In furtherance of our Human Capital initiatives, we appointed our first Chief Diversity Officer in May 2021 to continue the development and execution of our diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) strategy throughout the organization. This new role integrates our DEI strategy into every aspect of the employee lifecycle from recruitment to retention.

We look forward to your participation in our 2022 virtual Annual Meeting, but if you cannot participate, we solicit your participation to vote on the business items set forth in the attached notice. Regardless of the number of shares you own, your vote matters. We encourage you to sign and return your proxy card or use telephone or internet voting features prior to the meeting to assure that your shares are represented and voted at the meeting.

On behalf of our Board of Directors and all Group 1 Automotive team members, thank you for your continued interest and support in Group 1 Automotive, Inc.

Sincerely,

LOGO

  

April 11, 2019

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend Group 1 Automotive’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Company’s Sterling McCall Lexus dealership, 10025 Southwest Freeway, Houston, Texas 77074, on Thursday, May 16, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. Central Daylight Savings Time.

The Company achieved solid results in 2018, which included all-time record revenue of $11.6 billion. For 2019, the Company remains focused on delivering stockholder value by leveraging revenue growth, optimizing cost control, refining brand diversity, strengthening competitive components of our business model, enhancing digital marketing, and capitalizing on the experience and expertise within our overall management team.LOGO

The agenda for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders includes a vote to: (i) approve the nominees for our board of directors named in the proxy statement; (ii) approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, our executive compensation; and, (iii) approve Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for 2019. Management will also be available to review the Company’s business and financial performance.

Regardless of the number of shares you own, your vote matters. We hope you are able to join us at the Annual Meeting, but if you cannot, we look forward to hearing your voice via your participation in voting on the business items set forth in the attached notice. We encourage you to sign and return your proxy card, or use telephone or internet voting prior to the meeting, to assure that your shares are represented and voted at the meeting.

Thank you for your continued dedication of time and interest in Group 1. Our core values of integrity, transparency, professionalism, and teamwork promote success amongst our team, which includes our customers, our 14,000+ employees worldwide, and you, our stockholders.

Sincerely,

 
Stephen D. Quinn

Chairman of the Board

Earl J. Hesterberg

President & Chief Executive Officer

Notice of

Annual Meeting of StockholdersCEO

 

Thursday, May 16, 2019

(1)

Adjusted earnings per common share, adjusted net income, and adjusted operating cash flow are non-GAAP financial measures. Information regarding these non-GAAP financial measures, including reconciliation to most directly comparable GAAP measures, is included in Appendix A.

10:00 a.m.Central Daylight Savings TimeLOGO

Sterling McCall Lexus, 10025 Southwest Freeway, Houston, Texas 77074


LOGO

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 

Matters to be voted on:

LOGO

MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON:

 

1.

To elect the nine director nominees named in the proxy statement, each for a term expiring at the 20202023 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal;

2.

To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, our executive compensation;

3.

To ratify the appointment of ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019;2022; and

4.

To transact such other business as may be properly brought before the meeting.

StockholdersShareholders of record at the close of business on March 19, 2019,21, 2022, will be entitled to notice of and to vote atduring the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. A list of stockholders will be available and may be inspected during normal business hours for a period of at least 10 days prior

We are pleased this year to conduct the Annual Meeting solely online via the Internet through a live webcast and online shareholder tools. We believe a virtual format facilitates shareholder attendance and participation by leveraging technology to allow us to communicate more effectively and efficiently with our shareholders. This format empowers shareholders around the world to participate at our offices at 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77024. The list of stockholders will also be available for your review atno cost. We have designed the Annual Meeting. Invirtual format to enhance shareholder access and participation and protect shareholder rights, as described in more detail in the event there are not sufficient votes for a quorum or to approve the foregoing proposals at the time of the Annual Meeting, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned in order to permit further solicitation of proxies.

proxy statement.

The proxy materials, including this Notice of Annual Meeting, the proxy statement, a proxy card, and our Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 are being distributed and made available beginning on April 11, 2019.

12, 2022.

Your vote is important. We urge you to review the accompanying materials carefully and to vote by telephone or internet as promptly as possible. Alternatively, you may complete, sign and return the proxy card, by mail.

Houston, Texas

April 12, 2022

April 11, 2019

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Beth Sibley

Corporate Secretary

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the StockholderShareholder Meeting to be held on May 16, 2019.

18, 2022.
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders,Shareholders, our Proxy Statement and form proxy card
for the Annual Meeting and our Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 20182021 are available at http://www.proxyvote.com.


LOGO

Table of Contents

 

2019 PROXY SUMMARY8
BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS   1 
2022 PROXY SUMMARY3
PROXY STATEMENT7
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR BOARD
OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES
16
   9 
INVESTOR OUTREACH25
SUSTAINABILITY   16 
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY26
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS   
PROPOSAL 1ELECTION OF DIRECTORS28
17 
PROPOSAL 2ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION35
   25 
PROPOSAL 3RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNSTDELOITTE & YOUNGTOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM36
   27 
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE38
   29 
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS39
   31 
20182021 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS
41
   33
Compensation and Corporate Governance4133
Role of the Compensation & Human Resources Committee, itsIts Consultant and Management4134
Objectives ofCalibrating Our Executive Compensation Program4234
Compensation Components4337
Employment Agreements, Severance Benefits and Change in Control Provisions4845
Hedging and Pledging Prohibitions4846
Policy on Payment or Recoupment of Performance-Based Cash Bonuses and Performance-Based Stock Bonuses in the Event of Certain RestatementsAwards4946
Stock Ownership Guidelines4947
Tax Deductions for Compensation5047
Risk Assessment50
 48 
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION & HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE49
51EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
50 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION52
20182021 Summary Compensation Table5250
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 201820215351
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table5452
Outstanding Equity Awards at
December 31, 20182021
5553
2018 Restricted2021 Stock Vested5554
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation5654
Potential Payments upon Termination
or Change in Control
5756
Termination and Change in Control Tables
for 20182021
60
   60 
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION61
   62 
20182021 Director Compensation Table6162
Retainers and Fees6263
Equity-Based Compensation6263
Stock Ownership Guidelines63
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation6364
Compensation Changes for Fiscal 2022   64 
CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE64
   
Methodology64
65 
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS65
   66
Transactions6566
Policies and Procedures6667
SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION   68 
SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION67
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management6768
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT
THE ANNUAL MEETING
68
   70 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THESHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2023 ANNUAL MEETING69
   73 
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 20202021 ANNUAL MEETINGREPORT73
   74 
2018 ANNUAL REPORT73
HOUSEHOLDING   74 
HOUSEHOLDING74
OTHER MATTERS   74 
OTHER MATTERSAPPENDIX A: NON-GAAP
FINANCIAL MEASURES
74
75 


LOGO

Proxy Statement 2022  |  1

Business and Financial Highlights

Despite the unique challenges of the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (“Group 1” or the “Company”) continued to deliver record-setting financial results and increased operational effectiveness in 2021. The Company achieved solid results by successfully expanding its omnichannel marketing, closing attractive acquisitions involving approximately $2.5 billion in acquired revenues, executing an aggressive cost reduction plan and reengineering its processes. Our 2021 financial results compared to 2020 included:

LOGO

Back

  All-time record GAAP EPS for 2021 was $30.11, a 94.1% increase;

  Adjusted EPS for 2021 was $35.02, a 93.9% increase;

  All-time record GAAP net income for 2021 was $552.1 million, a 92.7% increase;

  Adjusted net income for 2021 was $642.1 million, a 92.5% increase;

  Achieved all-time U.S. Finance and Insurance (“F&I”) performance record of $2,155 per retail unit;

  Increased same store used vehicle total gross profit by 71.0%;

  Increased same store parts and service gross profit by 15.5%;

  Issued quarterly dividends totaling $1.33 per share for the full year;

  Repurchased 1,103,417 shares of common stock at an average price per share of $190.82, representing approximately 6% of total share float;

  GAAP operating cash flow of $1,259.6 million, a 56.4% increase;

  Generated record adjusted operating cash flow of $755.5 million, a 50.0% increase;

  Reduced SG&A as a % of gross profit from 65.6% in 2020 to Contentsa record 60.5% in 2021; and

  Acquired approximately $2.5 billion in annual revenues, an all-time annual record for the Company.

*Please see Appendix A for an explanation and reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures.

LOGO


LOGO

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  2


LOGO

Proxy Statement 2022  |  3

20192022 Proxy Summary

 

LOGO

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read thethis entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

This proxy statement is being distributed and made available beginning on April 11, 2019 in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. for use at our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

DATE & TIMEPLACERECORD DATE
May 16, 2019, 10:00 a.m.,
Central Daylight Savings Time
Sterling McCall Lexus,
10025 Southwest Freeway,
Houston, Texas 77074
March 19, 2019

VOTING

StockholdersShareholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on.proposal. All elections of directors shall be decided by a majority of votes cast by stockholdersshareholders entitled to vote in the election of directors.vote. All other matters submitted to the stockholdersshareholders shall be decided by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in persononline or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter.

COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Independent Chairman of the BoardClawback Provisions for Certain Restatements
No Excise Tax Gross-UpsAverage Board Attendance of 99% during 2018
Say on Pay Advisory Vote Conducted AnnuallyNo Stockholder Rights Plan (Poison Pill)
Annual Board and Committee Performance EvaluationsAnnual Election of our Board of Directors
Annual Review for Board and Committee RefreshmentIndependent Compensation Consultant
Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines for our Officers and DirectorsCompany Policy Prohibits Directors and Employees from Pledging or Hedging Group 1 Common Stock
Director Resignation Policy for Directors who do not receive a Majority Vote in an Uncontested Director ElectionFour of the Independent Nominees were added since 2014

proxy.

VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

 

Management Proposals:
 Board’s
Recommendation

Management Proposals:

  Board’s
Recommendation
Page
(for more detail)

Election of Nine Director Nominees

  FOR Each Director Nominee  2817

Approval, on a Non-Binding Advisory Basis, of our Executive Compensation

  FOR  3525

Ratification of ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  FOR  3627

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Board Composition and
Independence

Board and Committee

Practices

Board Oversight of Risk
Management

  Separation of the Chair and CEO roles

  7 of 9 director nominees are independent

  100% independent Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees

  Mandatory retirement age

  Limits on Board member service on other public company boards

  Annual Board and Committee evaluations

  Director orientation and continuing education

  Robust stock ownership guidelines

  Executive sessions provided for all quarterly Board and Committee meetings

  Philosophy of continuous Board refreshment to ensure a mix of skills, experience, tenure and diversity

  Board has significant interaction with senior management and access to other employees

  Annual review of enterprise risk management program

  Quarterly review of Cybersecurity program

  Quarterly review of ESG and Health and Safety programs

  Quarterly review of DEI program

  Quarterly review of PAC and GPI foundation income (donations) and contributions

LOGO


LOGO

SUSTAINABILITY HIGHLIGHTS

We strongly believe that our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) actions will help our business operations positively impact the planet, the people whose lives we touch and our bottom line. In an effort to better inform our shareholders and the investment community of our current initiatives and the actions we’ve taken, we recently released our inaugural 2021 Sustainability Report which may be found at www.group1corp.com/ESG. The report reflects the ESG progress we’ve made through 2021 and the things we hope to achieve in the future. A summary of our current ESG priorities and our respective 2021 accomplishments follows:

Our ESG Priorities

LOGO

FOSTER DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND INCLUSION

Appointed our first Chief Diversity Officer for executive oversight of our DEI strategy and actions

LOGO

SUPPORT OUR EMPLOYEES AND COMMUNITIES

Continued to encourage our employees to volunteer and to use our dealerships for community gatherings

LOGO

MAINTAIN STRONG GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES

Established the ESG Working Group that reports to the Governance & Corporate Responsibility Committee on a quarterly basis

LOGO

REDUCE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF OUR FACILITIES

Installed an additional 800 solar panels to bring our current total to more than 6,400 panels

LOGO

CONDUCT BUSINESS IN A SUSTAINABLE MANNER

Established a team responsible for improving our electric vehicle infrastructure

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  84

Election of Directors (Proposal 1)


Proxy Statement 2022  |  5

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

The following table provides summary information about our nominees for election to the Board of Directors.Directors (the “Board”).(1)Additional information for all of our directors may be found beginning on page 28.17.

 

      
          Committee Memberships

Directors

 Director
Since
 Age Other Public
Directorships
 Independent Audit
Committee
 Compensation
& Human
Resources
Committee
 Finance/Risk
Management
Committee
 Governance
& Corporate
Responsibility
Committee

Carin M. Barth

 2017 59 2  LOGO  LOGO LOGO

Earl J. Hesterberg

 2005 68 0    LOGO 

Steven C. Mizell1

 2021 62 1   LOGO  LOGO

Lincoln Pereira Filho

 2013 62  12    LOGO 

Stephen D. Quinn

 2002 66 1  LOGO LOGO  LOGO

Steven P. Stanbrook

 2019 64 1  LOGO LOGO LOGO 

Charles L. Szews

 2016 65 2  LOGO  LOGO 

Anne Taylor

 2018 66 2  LOGO LOGO  

MaryAnn Wright

 2014 60 2    LOGO LOGO LOGO

LOGO   Chair    LOGO   Member

 

(1)1Effective as of the Annual Meeting,

Mr. Mizell joined the Board size will be reducedin March 2021. He was appointed to nine members as one current director, J. Terry Strange, has reached the Company’s mandatory retirement age for non-management directors.Governance & Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Compensation & Human Resources Committee in May 2021.

2

Mr. Pereira serves on the Board of Boa Vista Serviços S.A.-SCPC, a public company listed on the Brazil Stock Exchange.

 

Our Board of Directors Recommends a Vote“FOR” the Election of each of the Nominees for Director.LOGO

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
  9

LOGO


Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Proposal 2)LOGO

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We are asking our stockholdersshareholders to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers.officers (“NEOs”). We believe that our compensation policies and practices are effective in achieving our Company’s goals of rewarding significant financial and operating performance, leadership excellence and aligning the executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders.shareholders. Our compensation philosophy is to set the fixed compensation of our named executive officers competitively for their demonstrated skills and industry experience. Our variable compensation, both annual and long-term, reflects the results of performance against a combination of quantitative and subjective measures. At last year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approvedShareholders, the compensation of our named executive officers was approved with a substantial majority of our stockholders (96%shareholders (97% of votes cast) voting in favor.

COMPENSATION COMPONENTS

TypeFormTerms
CashSalarySet annually based on market conditions, peer data and other factors
CashAnnual Incentive BonusLinked to financial-based and mission-based goals. Discretionary factors are considered when appropriate
EquityLong-Term Incentive Awards

Restricted stock with restrictions lapsing over a five-year period:

0%-40%-20%-20%-20%, to reward performance and promote retention of certain key employees

Performance Shares (implemented in 2019)

OtherEmployment Agreements and Severance and Change of Control ArrangementsChange of Control payment equal to 30 months base salary for our President/CEO and our Senior Vice President/CFO, plus prior year’s pro rata annual bonus
OtherDeferred Compensation PlanAllows deferral of up to 50% base salary and 100% of incentive bonus
OtherPerquisites

Demonstrator vehicle(s) and/or vehicle allowance

Our CEO may use our Company aircraft for up to 40 hours of personal use, provided he reimburses us based on the published standard industry fare level valuation method; we pay for club membership privileges that are used for business and personal purposes by our CEO

OtherBenefitsOn same terms as other employees, including our employee stock purchase plan
OtherIndemnification AgreementsIndemnification for our executive officers provided the executive was acting in good faith and in the best interest of our Company
OtherCompensation ConsultantIndependent Compensation Consultant engaged by our Compensation Committee

favor of our executive compensation program.

In evaluating this year’s “say-on-pay”“say-on-pay” proposal, we recommend that you review the section entitled “2018“2021 Compensation Discussion and Analysis” (“CD&A”) beginning on page 41,33, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narratives, which explainsexplain how and why the Compensation & Human Resources (“CHR”) Committee arrived at its executive compensation actions and decisions for 2018.2021, and provide detailed information on the compensation of our named executive officers.

2021 SUMMARY COMPENSATION

For more information, visit the section titled “Executive Compensation – 2021 Summary Compensation Table” on page 50.

       

Name and Principal Position

  

Salary

($)

   

Stock
Awards

($)

   

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation

($)

   

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)

   

All Other
Compensation

($)

   

Total

($)

 

Earl J. Hesterberg

President and Chief Executive Officer

   1,240,000    3,799,959    2,480,000    849,078    208,220    8,577,257 

Daryl A. Kenningham

President, U.S. and Brazilian Operations

   760,000    1,999,994    1,121,000    342,173    174,355    4,397,522 

Daniel McHenry

Senior Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

   575,000    499,925    661,250    859    34,557    1,771,591 

Frank Grese, Jr.

Senior Vice President, Human Resources,

Training and Operations Support

   633,450    699,807    715,799    373,425    32,605    2,455,086 

Peter C. DeLongchamps

Senior Vice President, Manufacturer

Relations, Financial Services and Public Affairs

   530,450    799,821    610,018    142,794    29,663    2,112,746 

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  106


2018 SUMMARY COMPENSATIONLOGO

 

Set forth below is the 2018 compensation for each named executive officer:Proxy Statement 2022  |  7

Name and
Principal Position
 Salary
($)
 Stock
Awards(1)
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)
($)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(3)
($)
 All Other
Compensation(4)
($)
 Total
($)
Earl J. Hesterberg
President and Chief Executive Officer
  1,150,000   3,599,959   1,437,500   337,607   378,588   6,903,654 
Daryl A. Kenningham
President, U.S. Operations
  624,000   987,935   780,000   181,560   26,745   2,600,240 
John C. Rickel
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  599,700   873,943   689,655   395,460   26,210   2,584,968 
Frank Grese, Jr.
Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Training and Operations Support
  572,500   683,955   658,375   193,206   31,914   2,139,950 
Peter C. DeLongchamps
Senior Vice President, Manufacturer Relations, Financial Services and Public Affairs
  478,300   645,958   550,045   82,345   24,952   1,781,600 
(1)The amounts in the “Stock Awards” column reflect the required accounting expense for these awards and do not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized. These amounts represent the grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. Assumptions made in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 5 to the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. Certain of these awards have no intrinsic value to the recipient until the performance or vesting schedule is met. Vesting schedules for equity awards can be found in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2018” table.
(2)Annual cash incentive awards based upon the achievement of financial and mission-based goals. This is discussed further under “2018 Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Annual Incentive Compensation Plan”.
(3)Amounts reflect above-market earnings on the Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts are reflective of earnings in excess of 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate, with compounding, of 3.12%. We do not offer a pension plan.
(4)Includes 401(k) savings plan matching contribution, automobile allowance, use of demonstrator vehicle, airplane use and club membership and dues.

Our Board of Directors Recommends a Vote“FOR”Proxy Statement the Non-Binding Advisory Approval of our Executive Compensation.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  11

Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2019 (Proposal 3)

 

As a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking our stockholders to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019. Set forth below is summary information with respect to Ernst & Young’s fees for services provided in 2017 and 2018.

Type of Fees 2018 2017 
Audit Fees $ 2,594,000 $ 2,526,000 
Audit Related Fees   
Tax Fees 79,000 162,000 
All Other Fees 2,200 2,200 
TOTAL $ 2,675,200 $ 2,690,200 

2022 ANNUAL MEETING DATE AND VIRTUAL LOCATION

Our Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “FOR” Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2019.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  12

OUR CORE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY VALUES

Our core values, integrity, transparency, professionalism and teamwork, underlie our commitment to conduct our business in ways that are principled and accountable to key stakeholders and the communities in which we do business. We are committed to responsible business practices and continuous improvement of our operations and our relationships with our employees and the communities we live and work in.

CommunityEnvironment and Safety
We believe that positively involving our employees and giving back to the communities in which we do business is central to our culture. Our charitable and philanthropic efforts include the Group 1 Foundation, employee volunteer opportunities, and partnerships with local food banks, homeless shelters, hospitals, school districts, animal rescue organizations and various other charitable organizations.We are committed to appropriately monitoring and managing our environmental impact across our businesses, and to protecting the health and safety of our employees, customers and those with whom we do business.
WorkplaceInvestor Outreach
We strive to create workplaces of mutual trust and respect, and to provide a work environment that fosters inclusion and diversity, enabling our employees to achieve their full potential. We aim to maintain a collaborative, supportive, and opportunity-rich culture that enhances innovation and employee engagement.We regularly interact with the investment community and prospective and existing stockholders through investor calls, conferences, meetings and occasional onsite visits. This interaction ensures that management and the Board understand and consider the views of our stockholders, perception of the investment community, and industry and economic outlook from the Company’s Wall Street covering analysts.

Business and Financial Highlights

Group 1 operates in three regions – the U.S., the U.K. and Brazil. In 2018, Group 1 continued to deliver record setting financial results and increased operational effectiveness. Our 2018 results compared to 2017 included:

Record consolidated revenues of $11.6 billion, an increase of $477.6 million;
U.K. record revenues of $2.4 billion, an increase of 22.7%;
Actual (GAAP) EPS for 2018 was $7.83, a 22.3% decrease; Adjusted EPS for 2018 was $8.91, a 15.3% increase;
Actual (GAAP) net income for 2018 was $157.8M, a 26.1% decrease; Adjusted net income for 2018 was $179.6M, a 9.8% increase;
Achieved all-time U.S. Finance and Insurance (“F&I”) performance record of $1,710 per retail unit;
Increased U.S. same store used vehicle retail unit sales by 8.8%;
2.8% same store parts and service revenue growth;
Total record sales of 318,516 new and used retail vehicles;
Repurchased over 2.8 million shares of common stock, or 14% of our outstanding shares;
Issued annual dividends of $1.04 per share; and
Acquired 17 franchises with estimated annual revenues of $615.0 million.


See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed February 19, 2019 with the SEC, for a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP measures.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  13

This page intentionally left blank

800 Gessner, Suite 500
Houston, TX 77024

Proxy
Statement

This proxy statement is being furnished to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (“Group 1” or the “Company”) for use at our 20192022 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Proxy materials were first sent to stockholders beginning on April 11, 2019.

2019 ANNUAL MEETING DATE AND LOCATION

Our Annual Meeting will be held virtually at Sterling McCall Lexus, 10025 Southwest Freeway, Houston, TX 77074,www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPI2022, on Thursday,Wednesday, May 16, 2019,18, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight SavingsSaving Time, or at such other time and place to which the meeting may be adjourned.

We have decided to conduct the Annual Meeting solely online via the Internet through a live webcast and online shareholder tools. We believe a virtual format facilitates shareholder attendance and participation by leveraging technology to allow us to communicate more effectively and efficiently with our shareholders. This format empowers shareholders around the world to participate at no cost. We have designed the virtual format to enhance shareholder access and participation and protect shareholder rights. Specifically,

We Encourage Questions. Shareholders have multiple opportunities to submit questions for the meeting. Shareholders may submit a question online in advance or live during the meeting, following the instructions below. During the meeting, we will answer as many appropriate shareholder-submitted questions as time permits. Following the Annual Meeting, we will publish an answer to each appropriate question we received on our Investor Relations website at www.group1corp.comas soon as practicable.

We Believe in Transparency. Although the live webcast is available only to shareholders at the time of the meeting, following completion of the Annual Meeting, a webcast replay, final report of the inspector of election, and answers to all appropriate questions asked by investors in connection with the Annual Meeting will be posted as soon as practicable to our Investor Relations website at www.group1corp.com.

We Proactively Take Steps to Facilitate Your Participation. During the Annual Meeting, we will offer live technical support for all shareholders attending the meeting.

ATTENDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

To attend, vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting, shareholders of record must use their control number on their proxy card to log into www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPI2022; beneficial shareholders who do not have a control number may gain access to the meeting by logging into their brokerage firm’s website and selecting the shareholder communications mailbox to link through to the Annual Meeting; instructions should also be provided on the voting instruction card provided by their broker, bank, or other nominee.

Online access to the meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m., Central Daylight Saving Time. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or course of the Annual Meeting, a phone number will be posted on the website to connect you to technical support.

Shareholders who wish to submit a question in advance may do so either by emailing Investor Relations at ir@group1auto.comby 5:00 p.m., Central Daylight Saving Time, Tuesday, May 17, 2022, or visiting our Annual Meeting website, www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPI2022. Shareholders also may submit questions live during the meeting. We plan to reserve some time for shareholder questions to be read and answered by Company personnel during the meeting. In submitting questions, please note that we will only address questions that are germane to the matters being voted on at our Annual Meeting.

References in this proxy statement to the Annual Meeting also refer to any adjournments, postponements or changes in location of the meeting, to the extent applicable.

LOGO


LOGO

 

DELIVERY OF PROXY MATERIALS

The proxy materials, including this proxy statement, the Notice of Annual Meeting, the form proxy card, and our Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 are being distributed and made available to stockholders beginning on April 11, 2019.

The proxy card provides instructions on how to inform us to send future proxy materials to you electronically by email. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy-voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by email or printed form will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Choosing to receive future proxy materials by email will allow us to provide you with the information you need in a timelier manner, save us the cost of printing and mailing documents, to you, and conserve natural resources.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  158


LOGO

Proxy Statement 2022  |  9

Information about Our Board of

Directors and its Committees

 

Meetings of the Board of Directors and its Committees

MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES

In 2018,2021, the Board held fiveten meetings, and acted by unanimous written consent nine times. The committees of the Board held a combined total of 2324 meetings. Each incumbentWith the exception of three directors that were unable to attend one ad hoc Board meeting, each director attended 75% or more100% of the aggregate of all of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served during the periods in which he or she served during 2018. Two directors were unable to attend one Board meeting.2021. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our directors are encouraged to attend the annual meeting of our stockholders.shareholders. All of our then-current directorsdirector nominees attended our 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Ms. Taylor joined the Board in September 2018, and therefore was not present at the 2018 Annual Meeting. We currently expect all of our director nominees to be present at the 2019 Annual Meeting.Shareholders.

BOARD PERFORMANCE PROCESS

Board Evaluation Process

As required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, ourOur Board and each of its committees annually conduct a self-evaluation to assess and identify opportunities to improve their respective performance. The Nominating/Governance & Corporate Responsibility (“GCR”) Committee is tasked with the oversight of the annual performance evaluation and to assist in designing and implementing such evaluations. The Nominating/Governance Committee has the authority to retain advisors or consultants and to provide for compensation to such consultants by the Company, as it shall deem appropriate. The 2018 board evaluations process is summarized below.

In 2018, the Nominating/Governance Committee reviewed and discussed the Board and Committee evaluation format and process and also decided to include individual director performance evaluations. The Nominating/Governance Committee and the Board elected to conduct the 2018 performance assessments through the use of electronic, written questionnaires. AWe engage a third party was selected to prepareassist us by preparing the performance assessments for electronic delivery, compilecompiling the responses, and aggregateaggregating the results.

Among other topics addressed, the Board and committee questionnaires solicitedevaluations solicit director opinions related to Board and committee effectiveness, director preparedness, strategic oversight, risk management, scope and content of presentations, access to management, and CEO and Board succession planning for the Board.planning.

Following completion by the directorsAs part of the performance assessments,evaluation process, the results were reviewed and aggregated by an independent third party. The third party provided a memorandumBoard Chair meets individually with each committee chair to the Chair of the Nominating/Governance Committee summarizingdiscuss the results of the Board, committee and individual director evaluations.

In early 2019, the Chair of the Nominating/Governance Committee met individually with each director and discussed the results of the director evaluations.his or her committee’s evaluation. The results of the committee evaluations wereare then reviewed by each committee chair with his or her committee members. The Board Chair then meets with each committee. Thedirector individually to discuss the results of the Board evaluations were presented toevaluation. In addition, the Board. Results requiring additional consideration will be addressed at subsequentresults of the Board and committee meetingsevaluations are discussed at the full Board and reported back to the Board, where appropriate.committee meetings.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  16

Corporate GovernanceCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We are committed to good corporate governance which includes the highest standards of professional and personal conduct. OurThe Board has adopted several governance documentsa standing Audit Committee, CHR Committee, GCR Committee and Finance/Risk Management (“FRM”) Committee. Each committee may form and delegate some or all of its authority to guidesubcommittees when it deems appropriate. Each committee also has the operationauthority to obtain advice and directionassistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors, to approve the fees and expenses of such outside advisors, and to cause the Company to pay the fees and expenses of such outside advisors. The CHR Committee additionally has the sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant to be used to assist in the evaluation of the compensation of our Boardsenior corporate officers and its committees, which include our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics, Code of Conductalso has the sole authority to approve the consultant’s fees and charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating/Governance Committee and Finance/ Risk Management Committee. Each of these documents is available on our website atwww.group1auto.comand stockholders may obtain a printed copy, free of charge, by sending a written request to Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77024, Attn: Corporate Secretary.other retention terms.

Board Leadership Structure

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Nominating/Governance Committee’s charter provides that the committee willGCR Committee annually assessassesses and approveapproves the leadership structure of the Board. In 2018,2021, the Nominating/GovernanceGCR Committee conducted that assessment, and determined that having an independent director serve as non-executive Chairman of the Board Chair continues to be in the best interest of our stockholdersshareholders at this time. Our Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting our strategic direction and providing day-to-day leadership, while the Chairman of the Board Chair sets the agenda for Board meetings, presides over meetings of the full Board and provides guidance to our Chief Executive Officer. We believe this structure at this time,currently ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of our Company and active participation of the independent directors in setting agendas and establishing priorities and procedures for the work of our Board. We discuss our directors’ qualifications and characteristics under “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors.”

LOGO


LOGO

 

Board DiversityDIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS AND DIVERSITY CONSIDERATIONS

Our Nominating/Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and recommending to our Board qualified individuals to be nominated to serve on our Board. Our Board’s objective is to select individuals that have a demonstrated record of integrity, sound business judgment, leadership, objectivity, independence of mind, and commitment. In selecting potential Board candidates, our Board seeks independent directors who represent a mix of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of our Board’s deliberations and decisions. In considering candidates for our Board, the GCR Committee, which identifies and recommends board candidates to the full Board, will consider the entirety of each candidate’s credentials. There is currently no set of specific minimum qualifications that must be met by a nominee recommended by the GCR Committee, as different factors may assume greater or lesser significance at particular times and the needs of our Board may vary in light of its composition and the GCR Committee’s perceptions about future issues and needs. However, while the GCR Committee does not maintain a formal list of qualifications, in making its evaluation and recommendation of candidates, the GCR Committee may consider, among other factors, diversity, age, skill, experience in the context of the needs of our Board, independence qualifications, moral character and whether prospective nominees have relevant business and financial experience or have industry or other specialized expertise.

The GCR Committee considers the diversity of the Board when identifying director nominees in accordance with its charter. We believe board membership should reflect diversity in its broadest sense, including persons diverse in perspectives, personal and professional experiences, geography, gender, race and ethnicity. This process has resulted in a Board that is comprised of highly qualified directors that reflect diversity as we define it. The Nominating/Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of this approach as part of our Board’s annual self-evaluation process.and diverse directors.

Independence of the Members of Our Board

BOARD INDEPENDENCE

The Board has analyzed the independence of each director. It has affirmatively determined that Mses. Barth, Taylor and Wright and Messrs. Adams, Quinn, Strange, Szews and Watson (all of our all non-employee directors) directors are independent directors under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). As part of its analysis, the Board determined that none of thesethe directors hashave a material relationship with our Company. Mr.Each of Messrs. Hesterberg and Pereira was determined not to be independent because hethey are employees of Group 1.

The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee, CHR Committee and GCR Committee are independent under applicable NYSE and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules for committee memberships, and that each member of the Audit Committee also meets the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All members of the Finance/Risk Management Committee, except for Messrs. Hesterberg and Pereira, are also independent as defined under the NYSE’s listing standards. The Board has also determined that each of Ms. Barth and Messrs. Quinn and Szews qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Pereira, who was appointed to the Board following our acquisition of UAB Motors Participações, S.A. (“UAB”) in 2013, was determined not to be independent because he is our Regional Vice President, Brazil and the Chairman of UAB.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  17

Charitable Contributions

defined under SEC rules.

We have in the past, and may, in the future, make donations to various charitable organizations. From time to time, some of our directors, officers and employees have been, and in the future may be, affiliated with such charities. During the annual independence review, our Nominating/GovernanceGCR Committee determined that any such affiliations did not impact the independence of our directors. We did not make any charitable donations to any organizations affiliated with our directors or officers in 2018.2021.

Director Resignation Policy

DIRECTOR RESIGNATION POLICY

Under our director resignation policy, in an uncontested election of directors, any nominee who receives a greater number of votes “against” than votes “for” his or her election will, promptly following the certification of the stockholdershareholder vote, tender his or her written resignation to the Board for consideration by the Nominating/ GovernanceGCR Committee. The Nominating/GovernanceGCR Committee will consider the resignation, as well as all factors it considers relevant, and will make a recommendation to the Board concerning whether to accept or reject it.such resignation.

In determining its recommendation to the Board, the Nominating/ Governance Committee will consider all factors it considers relevant, which may include:

the stated reason or reasons why stockholders who cast withhold votes for the director did so;
the qualifications of the director; and
the results of the most recent evaluation of the tendering director’s performance by the Nominating/Governance Committee and other members of the Board.

Under our director resignation policy, theThe Board will take formal action on the recommendation no later than 90 days following the certification of the results of the stockholders’shareholders’ meeting. In considering the recommendation, the Board will consider the information, factors and alternatives considered by the Nominating/Governance Committee and any additional information that the Board considers relevant. The Company will promptly disclose to the public the Board’s decision whether to accept or reject the director’s tendered resignation. If applicable, the Board will also disclose the reason or reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation.

 

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  10

Executive Sessions of Our Board


 

The independent directors meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled meeting of our Board. Mr. Quinn, our independent Chairman of the Board, presides over these meetings and is responsible for preparing an agenda for the meetings of the independent directors in executive session.Proxy Statement 2022  |  11

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  18

Risk OversightCOMMITTEES OF OUR BOARD

Our Board, as a whole and through its committees, has broad responsibility for the oversight of risk management with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company, including strategic, operational, cyber, financial, legal and compliance risk. In its risk management role, our Board seeks to satisfy itself that our risk management processes and systems that have been put in place to identify and manage risks are reasonable and functioning as designed. Our Board also has specific risk management oversight for governance, executive compensation and Chief Executive Officer succession planning.

Much of our Board’s oversight work is delegated to various committees, which meet regularly and report back to the full Board. All committees have significant roles in carrying out the risk oversight function. Each committee is comprised entirely of independent directors, except the Finance/Risk Management Committee, and is responsible for overseeing risks associated with its respective area of responsibility as further detailed below.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  19

In addition to reports from its committees, our Board receives regular reports directly from the officers responsible for oversight of particular risks within our Company. Specifically, our officers report to our Board regarding the Enterprise Risk Management Program that management has implemented to assess, manage and monitor areas of risk that are significant to our business, including market and automotive technology risk, safety and property damage risk, strategic planning and operational risk, financial and accounting risk, information technology and cybersecurity risk, and governance, regulatory and legislative risk. Risk profiles are updated annually to ensure that all risks continue to be identified. Our officers also report to our Board on which risks management has assessed as the most significant, together with management’s plans to mitigate those risks. Further, outside counsel reports in person to our Board periodically on an as-needed basis to keep our directors informed concerning legal risks and other legal matters involving our Company. Finally, we have robust internal audit systems in place to review adherence to policies and procedures, which are supported by a separate internal audit department.

Corporate Social Responsibility Oversight

At Group 1, we work to conduct our business in ways that are principled and accountable to key stakeholders and the communities in which we do business. Our Board and members of management recognize the importance of establishing an effective “tone at the top” with respect to giving back, and are actively involved in supporting various charitable organizations through their time and donations.

Cybersecurity and Information Security Risk Oversight

Our Board recognizes the importance of maintaining the trust and confidence of our customers, vendors, stockholders and employees, and devotes significant time and attention to oversight of cybersecurity and information security risk. The Board and Finance/ Risk Management Committee regularly receive presentations from our VP, Information Technology, on cybersecurity and information security risk, and on our cybersecurity initiatives. We also engage cybersecurity experts to audit and provide recommendations on our cybersecurity program. Additionally, members of our internal audit department conduct unscheduled visits to our dealerships to ensure that our customer’s personal information is protected and secured appropriately. The results of those dealership audits are reported to the Audit Committee. In 2018, our Board, the Finance/ Risk Management Committee and the Audit Committee received cybersecurity and information security risk reports at least quarterly.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  20

Committees of Our Board

Our Board has established four standing committees to assist it in discharging its responsibilities: the Audit Committee, the CompensationCHR Committee, the Nominating/GovernanceGCR Committee and the Finance/Risk Management Committee. The following chart reflectsEach committee is required to perform the current membershipkey functions summarized below as well as other such functions set forth in its charter or assigned by our Board from time to time.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee assists the Board in oversight of each committee:Group 1’s:

 

NameBoardAudit
Committee
Compensation
Committee
Finance/Risk
Management
Committee
Nominating/
Governance
Committee
John L. Adams(1)   
Carin M. Barth(2)  
Earl J. Hesterberg   
Lincoln Pereira   
Stephen D. Quinn 
J. Terry Strange(3)   
Charles L. Szews  
Anne Taylor(4)   
Max P. Watson, Jr.  
MaryAnn Wright(5)   
MEETINGS HELD IN 201859554

financial statements and other financial information provided by us to any governmental body or the public;

 

Member
Chairman
(1)Mr. Adams rolled off the Audit Committee following the 2018 Annual Meeting.
(2)Ms. Barth was appointed Chairman of the Audit Committee in mid-May following the 2018 Annual Meeting.
(3)Mr. Strange served as the Chairman of the Audit Committee until mid-May 2018. Effective as of the 2019 Annual Meeting, the Board size will be reduced to nine members as Mr. Strange has reached the Company’s mandatory retirement age for non-management directors.
(4)Ms. Taylor joined the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee in November 2018.
(5)Ms. Wright rolled off the Audit Committee following the 2018 Annual Meeting.

compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

 

Each of the committee charters is available on our website atwww.group1auto.comqualifications, performance and stockholders may obtain printed copies, free of charge, by sending a written request to Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77024, Attn: Corporate Secretary.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  21

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Pursuant to its charter, the purposes and responsibilitiesindependence of our Audit Committee are to:independent registered public accounting firm; and

 

oversee the quality, integrity and reliability of the financial statements and other financial information we provide to any governmental body or the public;
oversee our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
oversee the qualifications, performance and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm;
oversee the performance of our internal audit function;
produce the Audit Committee Report for inclusion in the proxy statement, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations;
oversee our systems of internal controls regarding finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics that our management and our Board have established;
provide an open avenue of communication among our independent registered public accounting firm, financial and senior management, the internal audit department, and our Board, always emphasizing that the independent registered public accounting firm is accountable to the Audit Committee;
review complaints dealing with financial reporting or potential violations of applicable laws, rules and regulations, or violations of the Company’s codes, policies and procedures, that are reported on the Company’s hotline; and
perform such other functions as our Board may assign to the Audit Committee from time to time.

the effectiveness and performance of our internal audit function.

In addition, to, and in connection with, the purposes and responsibilities described above, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also reviews our annual and quarterly financial statements and confirms the independence and quality systems of our independent registered public accounting firm.

All members of the Audit Committee are independent as that term is defined in the NYSE’s listing standards and by Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that Ms. Barth has the necessary accounting and financial expertise to serve as Chairman. Mr. Strange also serves on the Audit Committees of New Jersey Resources Corporation, Newfield Exploration Company and BBVA Compass. Our Board has determined that Mr. Strange’s simultaneous service on these other Audit Committees and our Audit Committee has not impaired his ability to serve effectively on our Audit Committee.

Our Board has also determined that each of Ms. Barth and Messrs. Quinn, Strange and Szews is an “audit committee financial expert” following a determination that Ms. Barth and Messrs. Quinn, Strange and Szews met the criteria for such designation under SEC rules and regulations. For information regarding the business experience for Mses. Barth and Taylor and Messrs. Quinn, Strange and Szews, please read “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors.” The Audit Committee held nine meetings during 2018,2021 and acted by unanimous written consent twice. All individuals who were members of the Audit Committee at such time attended each meeting of the Audit Committee.

Mr. Strange served as the Chairman of the Audit Committee until mid-May 2018. Following the 2018 Annual Meeting, Ms. Barth was appointed to serve as the Chairman of the Audit Committee.

one time.

The Report of the Audit Committee is set forth on page 3829 of this proxy statement.

Compensation & Human Resources Committee

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Pursuant to its charter, the purposes andOur CHR Committee’s responsibilities of our Compensation Committee are to:

 

review, evaluate, and approve our agreements, plans, policies, and programs to compensate our senior corporate officers;
review and discuss with our management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) to be included in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and to determine whether to recommend to our Board that the CD&A be included in the proxy statement, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations;
produce the Compensation Committee Report for inclusion in the proxy statement, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations;
oversee risks relating to employment policies, our compensation policies and programs, and our benefit systems;

review, evaluate, and approve senior corporate officers’ compensation;

identify, manage and mitigate any potential risks in the Company’s executive compensation plans;

oversee all matters relating to the succession of the key corporate officers of the Company other than our Chief Executive Officer;

review and discuss with our management the CD&A to be included in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and to determine whether to recommend to our Board that the CD&A be included in the proxy statement, in accordance with applicable rules and regulations;

produce the Compensation & Human Resources Committee Report for inclusion in the proxy statement;

oversee the Company’s human capital resources management strategy, including the recruitment, development and retention of personnel, talent management, and diversity, equity and inclusion; and

otherwise discharge our Board’s responsibility relating to compensation of our senior corporate officers; and

perform such other functions as our Board may assign to the Compensation Committee from time to time.

In connection with these purposes, our Board has entrusted the Compensation Committee with the overall responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring the compensation for our senior corporate officers (our named executive officers and officers that report directly to our Chief Executive Officer). The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the compensation of our senior corporate officersofficers.

For additional information regarding the role of management in the CHR Committee process, please see “2021 Compensation Discussion and makes appropriate adjustments based on Company performance, achievement of predetermined goals and changes in an officer’s duties and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee also approves all employment agreements related to the senior corporate officers and approves recommendations regarding equity awards for all employees. Together with management, and any counsel or other advisors deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee typically reviews and discusses the particular executive compensation matter presented and makes a final determination, with the exception of compensation matters relating to our Chief Executive Officer. In the case of our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  22

Committee reviews and discusses the particular compensation matter (together with our management and any counsel or other advisors deemed appropriate) and formulates a recommendation. The Compensation Committee’s Chairman then reports the Compensation Committee’s recommendation for approval by the full Board or, in certain cases, by the independent directors.

In general, executive compensation matters are presented to the Compensation Committee or raised with the Compensation Committee in one of the following ways: (1) at the requestAnalysis — Role of the Compensation Committee Chairman or another Compensation Committee member or member of our Board, (2) in accordance with the Compensation Committee’s agenda, which is reviewed by the Compensation Committee members and other directors on at least an annual basis, (3) by our Chief Executive Officer or Senior Vice President,& Human Resources TrainingCommittee, its Consultant and Operations Support, or (4) by the Compensation Committee’s outside compensation consultant.

Management.”

The Compensation Committee works with the management team, our Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Training and Operations Support, to implement and promote our executive compensation strategy. The most significant aspects of management’s involvement in this process are:

preparing materials in advance of Compensation Committee meetings for review by the Compensation Committee members;
evaluating executive performance;
recommending our business goals; and
recommending the compensation arrangements and components for our executives.

Our Chief Executive Officer is instrumental to this process. Specifically, the Chief Executive Officer assists the Compensation Committee by:

evaluating senior corporate officer performance (other than his own);
providing background information regarding our business goals; and
recommending compensation arrangements and components for our senior corporate officers (other than himself).

In addition, our Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Training and Operations Support is involved in the executive compensation process by:

providing the necessary compensation information to, and acting as our liaison with, the compensation consultant;
updating and modifying compensation plan policies, guidelines and materials, as needed; and
providing recommendations to the Compensation Committee and our Chief Executive Officer regarding compensation structure, awards and plan design changes.

Under its charter, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant to be used to assist in the evaluation of the compensation of our senior corporate officers and also has the sole authority to approve the consultant’s fees and other retention terms. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Compensation Committee may delegate some or all of its authority to subcommittees, as it deems appropriate.

During 2018, the Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“PM&P”) to conduct a compensation analysis which involved the comparison of long-term, short-term and total compensation of our named executive officers with a selected group of peer companies. We generally compare compensation data at the 25th, 50thand 75thpercentiles of the market and the Compensation Committee engaged PM&P to review the analysis. While we do not think it is appropriate to establish compensation based solely on market analysis, we believe that this practice is useful for two reasons.

First, our compensation practices must be competitive in order to attract and retain executives with the ability and experience necessary to provide leadership and to deliver strong performance to our stockholders. Second, reviewing market analysis allows us to assess the reasonableness of our compensation practices. This process allows us to achieve one of our primary objectives of maintaining competitive compensation to ensure retention when justified and rewarding the achievement of Company objectives so as to align with stockholder interests. PM&P is an independent compensation consulting firm and does not provide any other services to us outside of matters pertaining to executive officer and director compensation. PM&P reports directly to the Compensation Committee, which is the sole party responsible for determining the scope of services performed by PM&P and the directions given to PM&P regarding the performance of such services.

In February 2019, the Compensation Committee considered the independence of PM&P in light of SEC rules and listing standards of the NYSE. The Compensation Committee requested and received a letter from PM&P addressing the consulting firm’s independence, including the following factors: (1) other services provided to us by the consultant; (2) fees paid by us as a percentage of the consulting firm’s total revenue; (3) policies or procedures maintained by the consulting firm that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and a member of the Compensation Committee; (5) any company stock owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and (6) any business or personal relationships between our named executive officers and the consulting firm or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. The letter highlighted three additional factors that supported their independence: (1) PM&P has regular discussions with only the Compensation Committee (or select members of the Compensation Committee) present and where PM&P interacts with management, it is at the Compensation Committee Chair’s request and/or with the Chair’s knowledge and approval; (2) PM&P has not provided any gifts, benefits or donations to our Company or received any gifts, benefits, or donations from our Company; and (3) PM&P is bound by strict confidentiality and information sharing protocols. The Compensation Committee discussed these considerations, among other things, and concluded that the work of PM&P did not raise any conflict of interest.

All members of the Compensation Committee are independent as that term is defined in the NYSE’s listing standards, including the heightened standards applicable to compensation committee members. The CompensationCHR Committee held fiveseven meetings during 20182021 and acted by unanimous written consent once. All individuals who were members of the Compensation Committee at such time attended each meeting of the Compensation Committee.

one time.

The Report of the CompensationCHR Committee is set forth on page 5149 of this proxy statement.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
  23

LOGO


NOMINATING/GOVERNANCE COMMITTEELOGO

 

Pursuant to its charter, the purposes andGovernance & Corporate Responsibility Committee

Our GCR Committee’s responsibilities of our Nominating/Governance Committee are to:

 

assist our Board by identifying individuals qualified to become members of our Board and recommend director nominees to our Board for election at the Annual Meetings of stockholders or for appointment to fill vacancies;

recommend to our Board the appropriate composition of our Board and its committees and Board committee membership and leadership;
advise our Board about and recommend to our Board appropriate corporate governance guidelines and practices and assist our Board in implementing those guidelines and practices;
lead our Board in its annual review of the performance of our Board and its committees;
direct all matters relating to the succession of our Chief Executive Officer and other key officers of the Company; and
perform such other functions as our Board may assign to the Nominating/Governance Committee from time to time.

In connection with these purposes, the Nominating/Governance Committee actively seeks individuals qualified to become members of our Board seeksand recommend director nominees to implement the independence standards required by law, applicable listing standards, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”), our Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”) and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and identifies the qualities and characteristics necessary for an effective Chief Executive Officer.Board;

 

In considering candidates forrecommend to our Board the Nominating/ Governance Committee will consider the entirety of each candidate’s credentials. There is currently no set of specific minimum qualifications that must be met by a nominee recommended by the Nominating/Governance Committee, as different factors may assume greater or lesser significance at particular times and the needsappropriate composition of our Board may varyand its committees and Board committee membership and leadership;

advise our Board about and recommend to it appropriate corporate governance guidelines and practices and assist in light of its composition andimplementing the Nominating/Governance Committee’s perceptions about future issues and needs. However, whilesame;

oversee the Nominating/Governance Committee does not maintain a formal list of qualifications, in making its evaluation and recommendation of candidates, the Nominating/Governance Committee may consider, among other factors, diversity, age, skill, experience in the context of the needssuccession of our Board, independence qualifications, moral characterChief Executive Officer;

review the Company’s policies governing political contributions and whether prospective nominees have relevant businesslobbying, and financial experience or have industry or other specialized expertise.review Company and political action committee political contributions and expenditures;

 

The Nominating/Governance Committee may consider candidates for our Board from any reasonable source, including from a search firm engaged by the Nominating/Governance Committee or stockholder recommendations, provided that the procedures set forth below are followed. The Nominating/Governance Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates based on whether the candidate is recommended by a stockholder or not. However, in evaluating a candidate’s relevant business experience, the Nominating/Governance Committee may consider previous experience as a member of our Board. Any invitation to join our Board must be extended by our Board as a whole, by the Chairman of the Nominating/Governance Committee and by the Chairman of the Board.

Stockholders or a group of stockholders may recommend potential candidates for consideration by the Nominating/Governance Committee. For additional information on such requests and the applicable timing, please see “Stockholder Proposals for 2020 Annual Meeting.”

In additionreview matters relating to the purposes described above, our Board has entrustedCompany’s governance and corporate responsibility to confirm compliance with emerging best practices;

review ESG matters, including significant issues of corporate social and environmental responsibility and safety;

review the Nominating/Governance Committee withCompany’s material community participation and charitable efforts, including matters relating to the responsibility for establishing, implementingGroup 1 Foundation; and monitoring the compensation for our directors. The Nominating/Governance Committee establishes, reviews

establish, review and approvesapprove the compensation of our directors and makes appropriate adjustments based on Company performance, duties and responsibilities of the directors and competitive environment. directors.

The Nominating/Governance Committee’s primary objectives in establishing and implementing director compensation are to:

ensure the ability to attract, motivate and retain the talent necessary to provide qualified Board leadership; and
use the appropriate mix of long-term and short-term compensation to ensure high Board/committee performance.

All members of the Nominating/Governance Committee are independent as defined under the NYSE’s listing standards. The Nominating/GovernanceGCR Committee held four meetings during 2018, and acted by unanimous written consent once. All individuals who were members of the Nominating/Governance2021.

Finance/Risk Management Committee at such time attended each meeting of the Nominating/Governance Committee.

FINANCE/RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE

Pursuant to its charter and other applicable policies, the purposes of ourOur Finance/Risk Management Committee are to:assists our Board in its oversight of corporate finance and risk management, including:

 

review, oversee and report to our Board regarding our financial status and capital structure, debt and equity financings, cash management and other banking activities, compliance with covenants of material debt instruments, investor/stockholder relations, relationships with various financial constituents and securities repurchase activities, and authorize transactions related thereto within limits prescribed by our Board;
review return on investment for our stockholders through dividend and stock repurchase programs;
review and assess risk exposure, including cybersecurity, and insurance related to our operations and authorize transactions within limits prescribed by our Board; and

review, oversee, advise and report to our Board regarding our financial status and capital structure, debt and equity financings, cash management and other banking activities, compliance with covenants of material debt instruments, investor/shareholder relations, relationships with various financial constituents and securities repurchase activities, and authorize transactions related thereto within limits prescribed by our Board;

review return on investment for our shareholders through dividend and stock repurchase programs;

review and assess risk exposure, including cybersecurity and insurance related to our operations, and authorize transactions within limits prescribed by our Board; and

review capital expenditures and other capital spending plans, including significant acquisitions and dispositions of business or assets, and authorize transactions within limits prescribed by our Board.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  24

In connection with these purposes, the Finance/Risk Management Committee reviews periodically our financial status and capital structure and can authorize finance-related activities within limits prescribed by our Board. The Finance/Risk Management Committee reviews with management the status of current litigation matters and regularly reports to our Board on litigation and contingent liabilities. The Finance/Risk Management Committee also consults with management on matters that could have a significant financial impact on our Company and reviews our financial policies and procedures, our compliance with material debt instruments and our significant banking relationships. In addition, the Finance/ Risk Management Committee reviews and assesses periodically the risk exposure of our operations, including cybersecurity, and plans and strategies for insurance programs, and authorizes risk management-related activities within limits prescribed by our Board. The Finance/Risk Management Committee also provides direction for the assessment of future capital spending and acquisition opportunities and reviews capital expenditure plans, including significant acquisitions and dispositions of businesses andor assets, and other specific capital projects.authorize transactions within limits prescribed by our Board.

At the request of theThe Finance/Risk Management Committee management developedheld five meetings during 2021 and presented to the Boardacted by unanimous written consent one time.

RISK OVERSIGHT

We have a robust Enterprise Risk Management Program, designed to identify, assess, monitor, manage, and mitigate our significant business risks by concentrating primarily in five principal areas that are significant to our business:areas: (1) safety and property damage risk; (2) strategic planning and operational risk; (3) financial and accounting risk; (4) information technology and cybersecurity risk; and (5) governance, regulatory and legislative risk. Risk profiles are formally updated annually to ensure that alland as needed when significant risks continue to be identified.emerge like COVID-19 pandemic risks in 2020. Management updates the Finance/Risk Management Committee as new risks are identified, and on the steps taken to mitigate such risks. On an annual basis, management reviews results from tests of key risks with the full Board and the steps taken to mitigate new risks which have been identified.

Further, outside counsel advises our Board periodically on an as-needed basis to keep our directors informed concerning legal risks and other legal matters involving our Company. Finally, we have robust internal audit systems in place to help identify and mitigate risk and improve our internal controls, including reviewing our adherence to policies and procedures.

All

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  12


Proxy Statement 2022  |  13

Each Board committee has a significant role in assisting the Board in overseeing the risks that impact Group 1. Each committee is responsible for overseeing risks associated with its respective area of responsibility as further detailed below.

Committee

Responsibilities

Finance/Risk Management Committee

 Oversight of our operations risk, including quarterly reviews of cybersecurity and data protection, litigation management, and enterprise risk management strategies.

 Monitors our finance-related activities and provides guidance to management and the Board concerning our capital structure, capital allocation and our long-range financial policies and objectives.

 Oversees the formal process to identify risks company-wide, allocate them to the appropriate Board committee, and ensure that risk mitigation activities are being followed.

Audit Committee

 Oversight of risks relating to accounting matters, financial reporting and legal and regulatory compliance.

 Meets with our management and independent registered public accounting firm regarding the adequacy of our financial controls and our compliance with legal, tax and regulatory matters, as well as our significant financial and accounting policies.

 Meets with our vice president of internal audit and with other members of management, to review the identified risk areas and scope and results of the internal audits.

 Audit Committee Chair routinely meets between formal Audit Committee meetings with our chief financial officer, general counsel, corporate controller, vice president of internal audit and our independent registered public accounting firm.

Compensation & Human Resources Committee

 Oversight of succession planning for our key corporate officers (except our Chief Executive Officer) and the associated risks.

 Responsible for overseeing risks relating to employment policies, our compensation policies and programs, including the DEI Council, and our benefits systems.

 Has retained its own compensation consultant and meets regularly with management to understand the financial, human resources and shareholder implications of compensation decisions being made.

 A separate discussion regarding the risk considerations in our compensation programs, including the processes that are put in place by the CHR Committee and management to identify, manage and mitigate potential risks in compensation, can be found beginning on page 48 of this proxy statement.

Governance & Corporate Responsibility Committee

 Oversight of succession planning for our Chief Executive Officer and the associated risks.

 Responsible for identifying diverse and qualified Board candidates and other matters related to Board succession planning.

 Conducts a review of the performance of the Board and its committees and reviews and reassesses the adequacy of the corporate governance guidelines and recommends any proposed changes to the Board.

 Reviews matters relating to the Company’s governance, corporate compliance, and corporate responsibility, including ESG.

LOGO


LOGO

CYBERSECURITY AND INFORMATION SECURITY RISK OVERSIGHT

Our Board recognizes the importance of maintaining the trust and confidence of our customers, vendors, shareholders and employees, and devotes significant time and attention to oversight of cybersecurity and information security risk. At each of its meetings, the FRM Committee receives presentations from our VP, Information Technology, on cybersecurity and information security risk, and on our cybersecurity initiatives. We also engage cybersecurity experts to review, test, evaluate and provide recommendations on our cybersecurity program. Additionally, to assure compliance with our policies and procedures members of our internal audit department regularly visit our dealerships to ensure that our customers’ personal information is protected and secured appropriately. The results of those dealership visits are reported to the Audit Committee. In 2021, our Board, the Finance/Risk Management Committee except for Mr. Hesterberg, our President and Chief Executive Officerthe Audit Committee received cybersecurity and Mr. Pereira, our Regional Vice President, Brazil, are independent as defined under the NYSE’s listing standards. The Finance/Risk Management Committee held five meetings during 2018, and all members were in attendance.information security risk reports at least quarterly.

 

Communications with Directors

LOGO

 

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  14


Proxy Statement 2022  |  15

TRANSPARENCY AND ENGAGEMENT

Governance Documents

Our key governance documents including our Corporate Governance Guidelines and committee charters are available on our Investor Relations website at www.group1corp.com and shareholders may obtain a printed copy, free of charge, by sending a written request to Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77024, Attn: Corporate Secretary.

Communications With Directors

Our Board welcomes communications from our stockholdersshareholders and other interested parties. StockholdersShareholders and any other interested parties may send communications to our Board, to any committee of our Board, to the independent Chairman of the Board Chair (who presides over the executive sessions of our independent and non-management directors), or to any director in particular, to:

c/o Group 1 Automotive, Inc.

800 Gessner, Suite 500

Houston, Texas 77024

Attn: ChairmanChair of the Board

Any appropriate correspondence addressed to our Board, to any committee of our Board, to the independent Chairman of the Board Chair, or to any one of the directors in care of our offices will be forwarded to the addressee or addressees.

Investor Outreach

Each year, management interfaces with prospective investors, existing stockholders,shareholders, and buy-side and sell-side investment research analysts in a variety of event formats, to discuss the Company’s publicly disclosed performance, business strategy and outlook, and corporate governance. These events include earnings teleconferences; investor calls, meetings, and conference events; non-deal road trips; and occasionally site visits. Key topics include discussions regarding salescapital allocation, share repurchases, company growth through acquisitions, the impact of our inventory supply on new and used vehicles,use vehicle sales, market trends, parts and service strategies, successful implementation of our Val-u-LineAcceleRide® usedand Val-u-Line® vehicle sales program,programs, success with hiring technicians, the impact of the Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure & Brexit in the U.K.,COVID-19 pandemic on our operations, our digital retail strategies, capital allocation, and profitability. We address these topics with slide data in our roadshows and talking points on our earnings calls, conferences, and investor meetings. This interaction ensures that management and the Board understand and consider the views of our stockholders,shareholders, perception of the investment community, and industry and economic outlook from the Company’s Wall Street covering analysts, while enabling the Company to dynamically operate in an evolving industry and economy with respect to maximizing return for our stockholders.shareholders.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
  25

LOGO


LOGO

Corporate Social ResponsibilitySustainability

 

At Group 1, we work

Our core values of integrity, transparency, professionalism, teamwork and respect underlie our commitment to conduct our business in ways that are principled and accountable to key stakeholders, the environment and the communities in which we do business.We focus our efforts where we can have the most positive impactare committed to transparency in sharing out sustainability progress. For updates on our businessprogress and society, including issues related to community participation, environmental sustainability, culture and human capital.access our 2021 Sustainability Report, please visit www.group1corp.com/ESG.

Group 1 Foundation

Group 1 Foundation, Inc. (the “Foundation”) was formed in 2005 as a charitable 501(c)(3) entity with the purpose of providing guidance, emotional support and financial assistance, including though collected contributions and fundraising, to current Group 1 employees and their immediate families who suffer hardship due to a natural disaster, emergency hardship, extended illness, injury, fire, flood or special situation that is beyond their control. As an example of the Foundation’s efforts, through contributions made to the Foundation, employees in need were provided temporary living and related expenses after Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Michael.

Community Outreach

Since its inception, Group 1 and its employees have supported the communities they serve. We believe community participation and charitable donations enrich our dealerships’ local neighborhoods. We are proud of these efforts and we encourage participation by all of our dealerships and employees.

Since 2009, Group 1 has partnered with Kids’ Meals, a Houston-based organization that delivers over 3,000 meals per weekday, to provide lunches, free of charge, to hungry preschool-aged children, living in poverty around the Houston area. In November 2017, Group 1 was named Kids’ Meals Corporate Honoree.
Each year, Group 1’s corporate office donates essentials, such as socks, scarves, hats, gloves, hygiene products and food, to local charitable organizations. From 2016 through 2018, we provided approximately 780 bags of essentials to local homeless shelters and transitional housing organizations.
Group 1’s corporate office and many of our dealerships regularly support local schools with donations of school supplies and by providing students with mentorship, internship and career opportunities. Group 1 employees have supported Junior Achievement for 15 years by volunteering in the classrooms of local Houston schools to share their experiences and inspire young people to pursue their dreams. In 2017, Group 1 and Sterling McCall VIP Services announced a partnership with Houston Independent School District’s Teacher of the Month award; through the partnership Group 1 awards a Teacher of the Month with the use of a new vehicle.
For 2 years, Group 1 has supported BP MS 150, a member of Bike MS, the world’s largest fundraising bike series, organized by the National MS Society and focused on bringing awareness to and supporting research regarding MS.
In August 2018, Group 1 participated in a Houston-area job fair aimed at hiring 100 Armed Forces Veterans.
Our dealerships around the world also regularly support their communities through charitable efforts. For example, dealerships in the U.S. have partnered with The Humane Society, Habitat for Humanity, and local food banks, hospitals, school districts, animal rescue organizations and various other charitable organizations. Our dealerships in Brazil and the U.K. also support local charitable organizations; for example, in the U.K., dealerships have partnered with BBC Children in Need, an organization that funds projects to help children facing a range of disadvantages, and Ben – Support for Life, an independent charity focused on health and wellness in the automotive industry.

SUSTAINABILITY GOVERNANCE

We are proudcommitted to responsible business practices and continuous improvement of the sustainability of our dealershipsoperations and our relationships with our employees for their efforts to improveand the communities in which theywe live and work. For more information onWhile our charitableGCR Committee oversees our ESG policies and philanthropicpractices, other Board committees also play a role in our sustainability efforts, seerelating to cybersecurity, human capital management, health & safety and corporate risk management. In addition, our website at www.group1auto.com/group1cares.management team and other employee subject matter experts are responsible for the implementation of our ESG strategy, initiatives and communications.

 

Safety and Environmental Impact

In the U.S., U.K. and Brazil, we have partnered with environmental and safety consultation firms to assist in compliance with specific local and federal laws and regulations relating to environmental and safety issues. The consulting firms make periodic visits to dealerships and collision centers to conduct on-site assessments and training, and to aid in compliance with laws, regulations, and safety issues and environmental requirements.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  26
We strive to reduce our operating expenses while improving the employee and customer experience. We have retrofitted some of our dealerships and collision centers with exterior and interior LED lighting. In the U.S., we have completed exterior LED lighting upgrades at 99.5% of our dealerships and collision centers, and are approximately 40% complete with our interior LED lighting upgrades. Working with our lighting partner, we receive a ten-year warranty on all of our LED lighting retrofits, including parts and labor, effectively eliminating lighting maintenance expense where the retrofits are installed. Since September 2013, we estimate that these efforts have resulted in total cost savings of approximately $15.5 million, and reduced our energy usage for lighting by approximately 60%. In Brazil, we have retrofitted our corporate office and six of 20 dealerships and collision centers with LED lighting upgrades. Since our upgrade in February 2018, we estimate that these six locations have reduced their energy usage by 65%. The remaining dealerships and collision centers in Brazil are expected to complete their upgrades by the end of 2019. In the U.K., we have retrofitted 40% of our dealerships as part of construction projects. Future construction projects will include LED image upgrades.

Employee Wellness and Wellbeing

At Group 1, we believe that supporting the wellness and wellbeing of our employees helps create a healthier company and ultimately more sustainable value to our stakeholders. In 2016, the Company began the Group 1 Wellness program, which is focused on providing employees with healthy living challenges and access to individual health coaching. In 2018, Group 1 was recognized by the American Heart Association as an organization that is promoting the heart health of our employees.

We also believe that supporting our employees’ workplace satisfaction ultimately enhances the value of our business.LOGO

 

In 2008, we initiated the Manager Trainee Program, an entry-level rotational program designed for college graduates to learn our business from the ground up. Trainees will gain knowledge and experience within our Company over a 24-month period while working in one of our dealerships. The first year of the program is spent in Aftersales and the second year takes place in Variable Operations. After completing the program, trainees decide what area of the business suits them the most and where they would like to begin their career. This program helps prepare our employees for leadership roles within Group 1. We have had 69 employees graduate from the program. Examples of positions they currently hold are General Manager, New Vehicle Manager, Estimator, F&I Manager, Associate Manager Procurement, Manager Fixed Operations and Accounting Manager.
LOGOIn 2016, we launched the Pinnacle Program, an employee training and recognition program aimed at providing employees with meaningful opportunities to grow and develop, and to achieve greater employee retention and productivity in our business. Our dealerships are consistently recognized in the Automotive News Best Dealerships to Work for competition.
In 2018, the Company worked with a third party vendor to conduct a confidential employee engagement survey for all U.S. dealership employees, with a focus on individual managers and an overall view of each General Manager. As a result of the survey, each dealership GM prepared an action plan focusing on becoming a better leader. A summary of the results of the survey was shared with our Board.
In 2018, the Company elected to use the financial benefit it realized as a result of U.S. tax reform to recognize our U.S. employees who serve as the face of our company every day. Accordingly, a $500 bonus was paid to U.S. non-management dealership employees and operational staff.Proxy Statement 2022  |  16

Group 1 PAC


LOGO

 

GroupProxy Statement 2022  |  17

PROPOSAL 1 Automotive, Inc. maintains a Political Action Committee (PAC) that advocates for good government policies that further the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Group 1 PAC is open to all eligible employees, and utilizes voluntary payroll deductions as a means for its funding. Through its contributions, the Group 1 PAC engages in local, state, and federal issues.

The PAC’s mission statement is “The mission of the Group 1 PAC is to support political candidates, without regard to party affiliation, who best represent and support the interests of Group 1 Automotive and the automotive industry at the federal, state and local levels of government, and to educate Group 1 Automotive employees as to government, politics and public policy issues.”

The Group 1 PAC is governed by a four-member board. Those members are the SVP, Financial Services, Manufacturer Relations and Public Affairs; SVP and General Counsel; SVP and Chief Financial Officer; and Director, Governmental and Public Affairs.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  27
Proposal 1Election of Directors

Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws currently provide for annual elections of directors.

 

Our Board of Directors has nominated nine directors for election at this Annual Meeting to hold officebe elected to serve on our Board until the next annual meeting and the election of their successors. All of the nominees are currently directors. With the exception of Ms. Taylor who joinedEach nominee was elected to our Board in September 2018, all of the nominees were elected directors by a vote of the stockholders at theour last annual meeting of stockholders which was held on May 17, 2018.12, 2021. Each nominee agreed to be named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. All

For more information on the director nominees, please see the section entitled “Qualifications of the nominees are expected to attend the 2019 Annual Meeting. All then-current directors attended the 2018 Annual Meeting.Our Board of Directors” beginning on page 19.

The following table sets forth certain information, as of the date of this proxy statement, regarding our director nominees.

DirectorPosition and Offices with Group 1Director SinceAge
John L. AdamsDirector199974
Carin M. BarthDirector201756
Earl J. HesterbergDirector, President and Chief Executive Officer200565
Lincoln PereiraDirector, Regional Vice President, Brazil201359
Stephen D. QuinnDirector, Non-Executive Chairman of the Board200263
Charles L. SzewsDirector201662
Anne TaylorDirector201863
Max P. Watson, Jr.Director200173
MaryAnn WrightDirector201457

We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling for good cause to serve if elected. However, ifIf any nominee should become unable for any reason or unwilling for good cause to serve, proxies may be voted for another person nominated as a substitute by the Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors.

The number of directors on our Board is reviewed annually and fixedadjusted by our Board from time to time. We currently have ten directors serving on our Board. Effective as of the Annual Meeting, the Board size will be reduced to nine members as Mr. Strange has reached the Company’s mandatory retirement age for non-management directors. The Board will continue to evaluate the size of the Board and make adjustments as neededtime to meet the current and future needs of the Company.

Stockholders may not cumulate their votes in the election of our directors. Under Delaware law and our Bylaws, aA majority of votes cast by stockholdersshareholders entitled to vote in the election of directors is required for the election of directors. This means that director nominees who receive more “for” votes than “against” will be elected for that position. You may vote “for” or “against” with respect to the election of directors. Only votes “for” or “against” are counted in determining whether a majority has been cast in favor of a director. Abstentions are not counted for purposes of the election of directors.

OurPlease see “Director Resignation Policy” on page 10 for a description of our majority vote director resignation policy requires, in an uncontested election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “against” his or her election than votes “for” to promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the election results. The Nominating/Governance Committee will promptly consider the resignation and a range of possible responses based on the circumstances that led stockholders to withhold votes, if known, and make a recommendation to the Board. The Board will act on the committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the results of the election.policy.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  28

Our Board of Directors

DIRECTOR SKILLS AND DEMOGRAPHICS

Our Board believes that each of our directors is highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board. Each of our directors has contributed to the mix of skills, core competencies and qualifications of our Board. Our directors are highly educated and have diverse backgrounds and talents and successful records of accomplishment in what we believe are highly relevant positions with well-regarded organizations. Our Board has also considered the fact that all ofexperience our directors have workedfrom working for, or servedserving on the boards of directors of, a variety of companies in a wide range of industries. Many of our directors also have served as directors of Group 1 for many years and benefit from an intimate knowledge of our operations and corporate philosophy. Our Board believes that through their varying backgrounds, our directors bring a wealth of experiences and new ideas to our Board.

Described on the following pages are the principal occupations, positions and directorships for at least the past five years of our director nominees, as well as certain information regarding their individual experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to conclude that they should serve on our Board. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or named executive officers.

LOGO


LOGO

 

Skills and Qualifications of Our Board of DirectorsDemographic Matrix

 

The following table includes the breadth and variety of business experience that each of our director nominees brings to our Board.

 Board Member
 John L.
Adams
Carin M.
Barth
Earl J.
Hesterberg
Lincoln
Pereira
Stephen D.
Quinn
Charles L.
Szews

Anne

Taylor

Max P.
Watson, Jr.
MaryAnn
Wright
Experience/Knowledge:         
# of Other Public Company Boards Currently Serving On121 131 2
President or Former CEO  
Public Company Executive Position    
Automotive  IB  
RetailIB   
Engineering/Product Development     
Expertise:         
International  IB 
Finance     
Human Resources/Cultural     
Legal       
Mergers & Acquisitions  
Accounting   IB   
P&L/Income Statement Responsibility   
SOX Financial Expert      
Attributes:     ��   
Technology    
Independent  
Diversity      

The following table includes the breadth and

variety of business experience that each of

our director nominees brings to our Board.

 LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO
          

Experience / Knowledge

                           

LOGO

 

# of Other Public Company Boards Currently Serving On

 2 - 1 1* 1 1 2 2 2

LOGO

 

Former President or CEO

            

LOGO

 

Public Company Executive Position

              

LOGO

 

Automotive

       IB      

LOGO

 

Retail

      IB      

LOGO

 

Engineering/Product Development

         
          

Expertise

                           

LOGO

 

International

      IB    

LOGO

 

Finance

               

LOGO

 

Human Resources/Cultural

              

LOGO

 

Legal

                 

LOGO

 

Mergers & Acquisitions

         

LOGO

 

Accounting

        IB       

LOGO

 

P&L/Income Statement Responsibility

            

LOGO

 

SOX Financial Expert

               

LOGO

 

Technology

         
          

Attributes

                           

LOGO

 

Independent

         
          

Identity (self-identified in D&O Questionnaire)

                           

LOGO

 

Gender Identity (Male/Female)

 F M M M M M M F F

LOGO

 

LGBTQ+ (Yes/No)

 N N N N N N N N N

LOGO

 

Race/Ethnicity (White, African American/Black, Latino, Multiracial)

 W W AA/B W/L/M W W W W W

The lack of a for a particular item does not mean that the director does not possess that qualification, characteristic, skill or experience. We look to each director to be knowledgeable in these areas; however, the indicates that the item is a specific qualification, characteristic, skill or experience that the director brings to the Board.

IB – covered industry as Investment Banker

*Company is listed on the Brazilian Stock Exchange

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  2918

JOHN L. ADAMS


 

Age 74Proxy Statement 2022  |  19

Director Since: 1999DIRECTOR QUALIFICATION AND CONSIDERATIONS

Independent Director

John L. Adams has served as oneThe GCR Committee actively seeks individuals qualified to become members of our directors since November 1999,Board, seeks to implement the independence standards required by law, applicable listing standards, our Certificate of Incorporation, our Bylaws and served as non-executive Chairman of the Board from April 2005 through May 2017. Mr. Adams served as Executive Vice President of Trinity Industries, Inc., one of North America’s largest manufacturers of transportation, construction and industrial products, from January 1999 through June 2005, and as Vice Chairman from July 2005 through March 2007. Before joining Trinity Industries, Mr. Adams spent 25 years in various positions with Texas Commerce Bank N.A. and its successor, Chase Bank of Texas, National Association. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Adams was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chase Bank of Texas. Mr. Adams serves on the Board of Directors, the Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee and is Chairman ofGuidelines. For more information, visit the Finance and Risk Management Committee of Trinity Industries, Inc. Mr. Adams is Chairman of the University of Texas, Austin, President’s Development Board and serves on the Chancellor’s Council Executive Committee. He also serves on the McCombs School of Business Advisory Council. Mr. Adams recently retired from thesection titled “Information about Our Board of Directors and Audit Committee of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., a refreshment beverage business. Mr. Adams received his B.B.A.its Committees – Director Qualifications and J.D. from the University of Texas.

Diversity Considerations” on page 10.

The Board believes Mr. Adam’s extensive financial, strategic planning, capital allocation and executive management experience makes him well qualified to serve on our Board. His service on other public company boards has also provided exposure to various approaches to risk management, corporate governance and other key issues. Through his years of service onGCR Committee may consider candidates for our Board he has developed in-depth knowledgefrom any reasonable source, including from a search firm engaged by the GCR Committee or shareholder recommendations. The GCR Committee will evaluate candidates recommended by shareholders using the same criteria as for other candidates recommended by its members, other members of the retail automotive industry generally andBoard, or other persons. Any invitation to join our Company in particular. The Board believes his experience and expertise in these matters makes him well qualified to servemust be extended by our Board as a member ofwhole, by the Board.

CARIN M. BARTH

Age 56

Director Since: 2017

Independent Director

Carin M. Barth has served as one of our directors since February 2017. She is co-founderGCR Committee Chair and President of LB Capital, Inc., a private equity investment firm established in 1988. Since 2015, Ms. Barth has served onby the Board Chair.

Shareholders or a group of Directors of Enterprise Holdings, LLC,shareholders may recommend potential candidates for consideration by the General Partner of Enterprise Product Partners, L.P., one of the largest publicly traded partnerships and a leading North American provider of midstream energy services to producers and consumers of natural gas, and Black Stone Minerals, L.P., one of the largest oil and gas mineral and royalty companies in the United States, where she serves as Chair of the AuditGCR Committee. Ms. Barth also serves as a Trustee of the Welch Foundation, and as a Board member of the Ronald McDonald House in Houston, Texas. From 2012 through 2018, Ms. Barth served as Chair of the Investment Advisory Committee for Texas Tech University. From 2008 to 2014, she served as a Commissioner for the Texas Department of Public Safety. Ms. Barth previously servedFor additional information on the Board of Directors of Bill Barrett Corporation where she served on the Compensation Committee and on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from 2012 through 2016. From 2010 through 2017, she served on the board of directors of Strategic Growth Bancorp Incorporated, a privately held bank holding company located in El Paso, Texas, where she served as Chair of the Audit Committee, and Capital Bank, SSB, an affiliate of Strategic Growth Bancorp. Additional past board service includes Western Refining, Inc. from 2006 through 2016, where she served as Audit Committee Chair, Methodist Hospital Research Institute from 2007 through 2012, Encore Bancshares, Inc. from 2009 through 2012, Amegy Bancorporation, Inc. from 2006 through 2009, Texas Public Finance Authority from 2006 through 2008,such requests and the Texas Tech University System Board of Regents from 1999 through 2005. Ms. Barth was also appointed by President George W. Bush to serve as Chief Financial Officer of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development from 2004 to 2005. Ms. Barth received a B.S. from the University of Alabama and an M.B.A. from Vanderbilt University’s Owen Graduate School of Management.applicable timing, please see “Shareholder Proposals for 2023 Annual Meeting.”

Ms. Barth has extensive experience in a variety of financial matters, including as chief financial officer for several entities. She also has a history of corporate and civic governance which provides additional depth and financial expertise to our Board. Her experience with mergers and acquisitions, in operating a private equity company, her previous and currently held board positions on other publicly traded companies and her audit committee experience are key attributes, among others, that make her well qualified to serve on our Board. Ms. Barth qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert.”QUALIFICATIONS OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  

LOGO

CARIN M. BARTH

Co-Founder

and President of LB Capital, Inc., a private equity investment firm

Audit Committee Chair

Age 59

Director Since 2017

 

Independent Director

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Other Current Directorships

30 Enterprise Products Holdings, LLC

 Black Stone Minerals, L.P.

Other Directorships Within the Last Five Years

 BBVA USA Bancshares, Inc.

 Halcón Resources Corporation

 Strategic Growth Bancorp Inc.

Degrees

B.S. in Economics, University of Alabama; M.B.A, Vanderbilt University’s Owen Graduate School of Management

 

Career Highlights

  Co-Founder and President of LB Capital, Inc. since 1988

  Currently serves on the board of The Welch Foundation

  Former board member and current Emeritus board member of Ronald McDonald House of Houston

  Commissioner of the Texas Department of Public Safety from 2008 to 2014

  Appointed by President George W. Bush to serve as Chief Financial Officer of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development from 2004 to 2005

Ms. Barth has extensive experience in a variety of financial matters, including as chief financial officer for several entities. She also has a history of corporate and civic governance, which provides additional depth and financial expertise to our Board. Her experience with mergers and acquisitions, in operating a private equity company, her previous and currently held board positions on other publicly traded companies and her audit committee experience are key attributes, among others, that make her well qualified to serve on our Board.

EARL J. HESTERBERG


Age 65

Director Since: 2005

Earl J. Hesterberg has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director since April 2005. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hesterberg served as Group Vice President, North America Marketing, Sales and Service for Ford Motor Company, a global manufacturer and distributor of cars, trucks and automotive parts, since October 2004. From July 1999 to September 2004, he served as Vice President, Marketing, Sales and Service for Ford of Europe, and from 1999 until 2005, he served on the supervisory board of Ford Werke AG. Mr. Hesterberg has also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Gulf States Toyota, an independent regional distributor of new Toyota vehicles, parts and accessories. He has also held various senior sales, marketing, general management, and parts and service positions with Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. and Nissan Europe, both of which are wholly-owned by Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., a global provider of automotive products and services. Mr. Hesterberg serves on the Board of Directors of Stage Stores, Inc., a national retail clothing chain with over 800 stores located in 42 states where he is a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Chairman of the Compensation Committee. He is a past member of the Board of Trustees of Davidson College. Mr. Hesterberg also serves on the Board of Directors of the Greater Houston Partnership, where he serves on the Executive Committee and is Chairman of the Business Issues Committee. Mr. Hesterberg received his B.A. in Psychology at Davidson College and his M.B.A. from Xavier University in 1978.

As our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Hesterberg sets the strategic direction of our Company under the guidance of our Board. He has extensive senior executive management experience in the automotive industry. His successful leadership of our Company, and extensive knowledge of the automotive industry provides our Board with a unique perspective on the opportunities and challenges we face, and makes him well-qualified to serve on the Board.

LINCOLN PEREIRA

Age 59

Director Since: 2013

Lincoln Pereira has served as one of our directors since February 2013. Mr. Pereira has served as our Regional Vice President, Brazil since March 2013 and has served as chairman of our subsidiary, UAB (which we acquired in February 2013), since 2007. From 1999 to 2005, Mr. Pereira served as a legal representative of United Auto do Brasil Ltda, a public auto group operating in São Paulo and controlled by United Auto Group. From 1995 through 2005, Mr. Pereira practiced law with Cunha Pereira Advogados, representing professional athletes and international race car drivers. He was also co-founder and a major stockholder in Cunha Pereira Negócios Imobiliários, a local Brazilian real estate company, and in 1999, he founded Atrium Telecomunicações Ltda, a provider of local exchange telecommunication services. Atrium was sold to Telefonica of Spain in December 2004, and Mr. Pereira founded E-Vertical Tecnologia, a leading provider of high tech facilities management services to commercial properties. From 1978 through 1995, Mr. Pereira held numerous positions with various banks, both in Brazil and abroad. Mr. Pereira serves on the Board of Boa Vista Servicos S.A.-SCPC, the second largest credit bureau in Brazil, is Vice Chairman of the Board of the São Paulo Chamber of Commerce (ACSP), serves as a member of the Board of the Associação Brasileira dos Concessionários Mercedes-Benz, and serves as a Director of the Associação Brasileira dos Concessionários BMW and Associação Brasileira do Distribuidores Toyota. He is also a Chapter Sponsorship Officer of YPO-WPO São Paulo, a not-for-profit, global network of young chief executives connected around the shared mission of becoming Better Leaders Through Education and Idea Exchange.™ Mr. Pereira received his LL.B. from Faculdade de Direito do Largo de São Francisco.

Mr. Pereira has extensive automotive retailing and manufacturer relations experience, as well as legal, finance, business and management expertise. He also has a deep understanding of the Brazilian finance, trade and legal sectors. Mr. Pereira’s experience and expertise in the automotive industry make him well qualified to serve as a member of the Board.LOGO

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  

LOGO

EARL J.

HESTERBERG

President and Chief Executive Officer of Group 1

Age 68

Director Since 2005

 

Other Current Directorships

None

Other Directorships Within the Last Five Years

31 Stage Stores, Inc.

Degrees

B.A. in Psychology, Davidson College;

M.B.A, Xavier University

Career Highlights

  CEO and President of Group 1 since 2005

  Served as Group Vice President, North America Marketing, Sales and Service for Ford Motor Company since October 2004. From July 1999 to September 2004, he served as Vice President, Marketing, Sales and Service for Ford of Europe, and from 1999 until 2005, he served on the supervisory board of Ford Werke AG

  Previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Gulf States Toyota, an independent regional distributor of new Toyota vehicles, parts and accessories

  Held various senior sales, marketing, general management, and parts and service positions with Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. and Nissan Europe, both of which are wholly owned by Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.

  Currently serves on the board of the Greater Houston Partnership

  Past member of the Board of Trustees of Davidson College

As our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Hesterberg sets the strategic direction of our Company under the guidance of our Board. He has extensive senior executive management experience in the automotive industry. His successful leadership of our Company and extensive knowledge of the automotive industry provides our Board with a unique perspective on the opportunities and challenges we face and makes him well qualified to serve on our Board.

LOGO

STEVEN C. MIZELL

Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer at Merck & Co., Inc., a multinational pharmaceutical company

Age 62

Director Since 2021

Independent Director

Other Current Directorships

 Allegion plc

Other Directorships Within the Last Five Years

 Oshkosh Corporation

Degrees

B.S. in Industrial Management, Georgia Institute of Technology;

M.S. in Management, Carnegie Mellon University

Career Highlights

  Responsible for all aspects of human resources at Merck & Co. since 2018, which has been recognized as one of the Top 10 Best Workplaces in Health Care and Biopharma by Fortune and Great Place to Work, Best Workplace for Innovators by Fast Company magazine, Best Companies for Multicultural Women by Working Mother magazine, Top Veteran-Friendly Companies by U.S. Veterans Magazine and Companies that Care by People Magazine

  Joined Monsanto, a global leader in sustainable agriculture, as Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer in 2004; served as Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer from 2007 to 2018

  Previously served as Senior Vice President and Chief Corporate Resources Officer for AdvancePCS, a pharmaceutical company

  Currently serves on the board of the United Way Charmaine Chapman Society of St. Louis

  Recognized as one of St. Louis’s most influential Diverse Business Leaders

  National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) Directorship Certified

Mr. Mizell’s human resource management expertise from his position with an international, publicly traded company makes him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board. His extensive, global leadership experience and knowledge of human capital management provides our Board with valuable insights. Mr. Mizell was identified as a potential Board candidate by a current member of the Board.

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  20


Proxy Statement 2022  |  21

LOGO

LINCOLN PEREIRA FILHO

Regional Vice President, Brazil of Group 1

Age 62

Director Since 2013

Other Current Directorships

 Boa Vista Serviços S.A.-SCPC

 Tempo Telecomunicações

 Associação Brasileira dos Concessionários BMW

 Associação Brasileira dos Distribuidores Toyota

Other Directorships Within the Last Five Years

None

Degrees

LL.B, Faculdade de Direito do Largo de São Francisco;

London Business School

 

Career Highlights

  Regional Vice President, Brazil of Group 1 since 2013

  Served as a legal representative of United Auto do Brasil Ltda, a public auto group operating in São Paulo and controlled by United Auto Group, from 1999 to 2005

  Previously practiced law with Cunha Pereira Advogados, representing professional athletes and international racecar drivers, from 1995 through 2005

  Founded Atrium Telecomunicações Ltda, a provider of local exchange telecommunication services, in 1999. Atrium was sold to Telefónica of Spain in December 2004

  Founded E-Vertical Tecnologia, a leading provider of high tech facilities management services to commercial properties

  Serves as Vice President of the São Paulo Chamber of Commerce (ACSP)

  Held numerous positions with various banks, both in Brazil and abroad, from 1978 through 1995

Mr. Pereira has extensive automotive retailing and manufacturer relations experience, as well as legal, finance, business and management expertise. He also has a deep understanding of the Brazilian finance, trade and legal sectors. Mr. Pereira’s experience and expertise in the automotive industry make him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

Back

LOGO

STEPHEN D. QUINN

Former General Partner and Managing Director of Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Non-Executive Chair of the Board

Age 66

Director Since 2002

Independent Director

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Other Current Directorships

 Zions Bancorporation

Other Directorships Within the Last Five Years

None

Degrees

B.S. in Economics, Brigham Young University;

M.B.A., Harvard University Graduate School of Business

Career Highlights

  Joined Goldman, Sachs & Co., a full-service global investment banking and securities firm, in August 1981, where he specialized in corporate finance

  Served as a General Partner and Managing Director of Goldman, Sachs & Co. from 1990 until his retirement in 2001

Mr. Quinn was selected to Contents

serve as a director on our Board due to his valuable financial expertise and extensive experience with capital markets transactions. His judgment in assessing business strategies and the accompanying risks is an invaluable resource for our business model. Mr. Quinn also has significant historical knowledge of our Company as a result of his role at Goldman Sachs, an underwriter for our initial public offering. The Board believes his experience and expertise in these matters make him well qualified to serve as a member and Chair of our Board.

STEPHEN D. QUINN

 

Age 63LOGO

Director Since: 2002


Independent Director

Stephen D. Quinn has served as our independent Chairman of the Board since May 2017, and as one of our directors since May 2002. Mr. Quinn joined Goldman, Sachs & Co., a full-service global investment banking and securities firm, in August 1981 where he specialized in corporate finance. From 1990 until his retirement in 2001, Mr. Quinn served as a General Partner and Managing Director of Goldman, Sachs. Mr. Quinn serves on the Audit Committee, the Nominating/Governance Committee, and as Lead Director of Zions Bancorporation, a large publicly-traded bank holding company. Mr. Quinn holds degrees from Brigham Young University and Harvard University Graduate School of Business.

Mr. Quinn was selected to serve as a director on our Board due to his valuable financial expertise and extensive experience with capital markets transactions. His judgment in assessing business strategies and the accompanying risks is an invaluable resource for our business model. Mr. Quinn also has significant historical knowledge of our Company as a result of his role at Goldman Sachs, an underwriter for our initial public offering. The Board believes his experience and expertise in these matters make him well qualified to serve as a member of the Board. Mr. Quinn qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert.”

CHARLES L. SZEWS

Age 62

Director Since: 2016

Independent Director

Charles L. Szews has served as one of our directors since November 2016. In January 2016, Mr. Szews retired from Oshkosh Corporation, a leading global manufacturer of specialty vehicles and vehicle bodies serving access equipment, defense, fire and emergency, and commercial markets. He joined Oshkosh in 1996 as Vice President and CFO, was appointed Executive Vice President in October 1997, and President and Chief Operating Officer in October 2007. Mr. Szews was appointed Chief Executive Officer in January 2011. Prior to joining Oshkosh, he began his career with Ernst & Young, and was Vice President and Controller at Fort Howard Corporation during its leveraged buyout. From November 2006 through July 2013, Mr. Szews served as a director of Gardner Denver, Inc., a worldwide provider of industrial equipment technologies and related parts and services, where he also served as Chairman of the Audit Committee and on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Since 2014, Mr. Szews has served as a director and on the Audit and Finance Committees for Commercial Metals Company, an operator of mini-steel mills located in the Southern United States and Poland. In August 2016, he was appointed to the board of directors of Rowan Companies plc, a global provider of contract drilling services, where he also serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Health, Safety and Environment Committee. In April 2018, Mr. Szews was appointed to the board of directors of Allegion plc, a provider of security products and solutions for homes, businesses, schools and other institutions, where he also serves on the Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees. Mr. Szews holds a degree in Business Administration from the University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire.

Mr. Szews was selected to serve on our Board due to his extensive operational and financial experience and his background in public accounting, auditing and risk management. His previous and current board positions on other publicly-traded companies have provided many years of audit committee experience, including as chair. Mr. Szews’ extensive financial and audit experience in a variety of senior management positions, combined with his global operational experience in vehicle manufacturing and distribution, have provided him with a wealth of knowledge in dealing with complex strategic, financial and accounting matters. Mr. Szews qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert.”LOGO

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  

LOGO

STEVEN P. STANBROOK

Former Chief Operating Officer, International Markets of S.C. Johnson, Inc.

Age 64

Director Since 2019

 

Independent Director

Other Current Directorships

32 Primo Water Corporation

Other Directorships Within the Last Five Years

 Chiquita Brands International, Inc.

 Hewitt Associates, Inc.

 Imperial Brands plc

Degrees

HNC in Business Studies, Thames Valley University, U.K.

 

Career Highlights

Back

  Retired from S.C. Johnson, Inc., a global manufacturer and marketer of household products, in 2015, following a distinguished 19-year career serving in various roles, including most recently as Chief Operating Officer, International Markets

  Previously held a variety of senior leadership positions with both Sara Lee Corporation, including Chief Executive Officer of Sara Lee Bakery, and CompuServe, the leading, global Internet Service Provider

  Over 30 years of experience operating across the global consumer package goods sector

Mr. Stanbrook was selected to Contents

serve on our Board due to his extensive international operational experience and his background in business development. His previous and current board positions on other publicly traded companies, combined with his global operational experience in a variety of senior management positions, have provided him with a wealth of knowledge in dealing with complex strategic, business matters.

ANNE TAYLOR

Age 63

Director Since: 2018

Independent Director

Anne Taylor has served as one of our directors since September 2018. In 2018, Ms. Taylor retired from Deloitte, a leading global provider of audit and assurance, consulting, financial advisory, risk advisory, tax and related services, where she served as Vice Chairman, and Managing Partner of the Houston office. During her 30-year career at Deloitte, she held numerous leadership roles, including Regional Managing Partner for the eight-state Mid-America region. Ms. Taylor was Deloitte’s first Chief Strategy Officer, taking on the role at the initiation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (as amended, the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). Under her leadership, the resulting firm grew a portfolio business, along with integrated service offerings, and retained a management consulting business that grew from $3.0 billion in revenue in 2003 to the largest in the world today at over $14.0 billion. She served as global e-business leader where she led Deloitte’s transformation to serve clients in the digital economy, which has evolved into the basis of Deloitte’s cyber-security practice. Additionally, Ms. Taylor was the strategic partner advisor to the World Economic Forum’s Technology Pioneer program and became the first woman to serve on Deloitte’s US executive committee and the management committee of Deloitte Global. She has served on Deloitte’s board of directors, chairing the strategic review of the proposed transaction to separate Deloitte Consulting. She served on both the US and Global Nominating Committees, the CEO Evaluation Committee, chaired the Strategic Investment Committee and served on the board of directors of Deloitte Consulting LLP (Global). Ms. Taylor serves on the Board of Directors of Southwestern Energy Company, an independent energy company engaged in natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil exploration, development, production, gathering and marketing. Ms. Taylor also serves on the Board of Directors of Conway MacKenzie, a consulting firm providing specialized, turnaround consulting and litigation support services. She also currently serves as the Chairman of the Board of Central Houston, Inc., is a member of C200 and previously served as an executive board member of the Greater Houston Partnership and United Way of Greater Houston. Ms. Taylor received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in civil engineering from the University of Utah, and attended Princeton University, pursuing PH.D. studies in transportation engineering. Ms. Taylor was identified as a potential Board candidate by two members of our Board of Directors.

Ms. Taylor is financially literate and has participated in audit committee meetings of many Deloitte clients. She was selected to serve on our Board due to her management and leadership experience, extensive background in global e-business, development and execution of business strategy, and corporate governance experience.

MAX P. WATSON, JR.

Age 73

Director Since: 2001

Independent Director

Max P. Watson, Jr. has served as one of our directors since May 2001. Mr. Watson served as President and Chief Executive Officer of BMC Software, Inc., a provider of enterprise management solutions, from April 1990 to January 2001. He served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of BMC from January 1992 until his retirement in April 2001. Mr. Watson serves on the Board of Trustees of Texas Children’s Hospital and as Chairman of the Quality and Safety Committee. From January 2007 through December 2008, Mr. Watson served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Texas Children’s Hospital. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Scenic Houston, an organization dedicated to preserving and enhancing the visual character of Houston. Mr. Watson holds a Bachelor’s in Business Administration from Louisiana Tech University.

Mr. Watson’s extensive business and management expertise from his position with a large global publicly-traded company makes him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board. As a former chairman, president and chief executive officer, Mr. Watson is familiar with many of the business issues we face today, including financial and strategic planning, technology, compensation, management development, international acquisitions, capital allocation, and stockholder relations.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  

LOGO

CHARLES L. SZEWS

Former Chief Executive Officer of Oshkosh Corporation

FRM Committee Chair

Age 65

Director Since 2016

 

Independent Director

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Other Current Directorships

33 Commercial Metals Company

 Allegion plc

Other Directorships Within the Last Five Years

 Rowan Companies plc

 Valaris plc

Degrees

B.B.A. in Comprehensive Public Accounting, University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire

Career Highlights

  Joined Oshkosh Corporation, a leading global manufacturer of specialty vehicles and vehicle bodies serving access equipment, defense, fire and emergency, and commercial markets, as Vice President and CFO in 1996; appointed Executive Vice President in October 1997; appointed President and Chief Operating Officer in October 2007

  Served as Chief Executive Officer at Oshkosh Corporation from January 2011 until his retirement in 2016

  Vice President and Controller at Fort Howard Corporation during its leveraged buyout

  Began his career with Ernst & Young

Mr. Szews was selected to serve on our Board due to his extensive operational and financial experience and his background in public accounting, auditing and risk management. His previous and current board positions on other publicly traded companies have provided many years of audit committee experience, including as chair. Mr. Szews’ extensive financial and audit experience in a variety of senior management positions, combined with his global operational experience in vehicle manufacturing and distribution, including autonomous and electric vehicles, have provided him with a wealth of knowledge in dealing with complex strategic, financial and accounting matters.

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  22


Proxy Statement 2022  |  23

LOGO

ANNE TAYLOR

Former Vice Chairman and Managing Partner of the Houston office of Deloitte, LLP

CHR Committee Chair

Age 66

Director Since 2018

Independent Director

Other Current Directorships

 Southwestern Energy Company

 Whiting Petroleum Corporation

Other Directorships Within the Last Five Years

None

Degrees

B.S. in Engineering, University of Utah;

M.S. in Engineering, University of Utah;

Attended Princeton University, pursuing Ph.D studies in Transportation Engineering

 

Career Highlights

Back

  Joined Deloitte, a leading global provider of audit and assurance, consulting, financial advisory, risk advisory, tax and related services in 1987, serving as Regional Managing Partner, Chief Strategy Officer and Global Leader for e-business; served as Vice Chairman and Managing Partner of the Houston office from 2013 until her retirement in 2018; chaired the strategic review of the proposed transaction to Contents

MARYANN WRIGHT

Age 57

Director Since: 2014

Independent Director

MaryAnn Wright has served as one of our directors since August 2014. Ms. Wright owns TechGoddess LLC, a technical consulting firm serving global Tier 1 automotive suppliers. From 2007 through 2017, she worked for Johnson Controls Power Solutions (“Johnson Controls”), the global leader in automotive lead-acid and advanced batteries, serving as Group Vice President of Engineering & Product Development from 2013 through 2017, and Vice President of Technology and Innovation from 2009 to 2013. She served as Vice President and General Manager for Johnson Controls Hybrid Systems business and as CEO of Johnson Controls-Saft from 2007 through 2009. Prior to joining Johnson Controls, Ms. Wright served as Executive Vice President Engineering, Product Development, Commercial and Program Management for Collins & Aikman Corporation. From 1988 through 2005, Ms. Wright served as Director, Sustainable Mobility Technologies and Hybrid Vehicle Programs at Ford Motor Company, and was the Chief Engineer of the 2005 Ford Escape Hybrid, the industry’s first full hybrid SUV and also led the launch of Ford’s first hydrogen-powered fuel cell fleet program. Ms. Wright serves on theseparate Deloitte Consulting while serving on Deloitte’s Board of Directors and the Nominating and Governance Committee of Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., a developer of innovative analog and mixed-signal products and technologies. She also serves as a Director of Delphi Technologies, a leading provider of advanced vehicle propulsion solutions, where she is a member of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee and Chairman of the Innovation and Technology Committee. Ms. Wright is also active in the community where she serves as Board Chair of the Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit. She previously served on the Board of Governors at Argonne National Laboratory, and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and as Trustee at Lawrence Technological University. Ms. Wright received a B.A. in Economics and International Business and a Master of Science in Engineering from the University of Michigan and an M.B.A. from Wayne State University.

Ms. Wright was selected to serve on our Board because of her extensive experience and her knowledge of the automotive industry, having been named one of the “Leading 100 Women in the Automotive Industry” by Automotive News. Her unique business, manufacturing, engineering and technology background and her extensive global automotive experience make her well qualified to serve as a member of the Board.

 

  Became the first woman to serve on Deloitte’s US executive committee and the management committee of Deloitte Global

  Currently serves on the board of Memorial Hermann Hospital System and Central Houston, Inc. and previously served on the boards of the Greater Houston Partnership and United Way of Greater Houston

  President and sole owner of ATStrategies, LLC, a private consulting firm

  Currently serves on the Board of Directors of Conway Mackenzie and as a consultant for Flynn Heath Leadership

  Previously served as the strategic partner advisor to the World Economic Forum’s Technology Pioneer Program

Ms. Taylor is financially literate and has participated in audit committee meetings of many Deloitte clients. She was selected to serve on our Board due to her management and leadership experience, extensive background in global technology, development and execution of business strategy, and corporate governance experience.

LOGO

MARYANN WRIGHT

Former Group Vice President of Johnson Controls International

GCR Committee Chair

Age 60

Director Since 2014

Independent Director

Other Current Directorships

 Micron Technology, Inc.

 Brunswick Corporation

Other Directorships Within the Last Five Years

 Delphi Technologies

 Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.

Degrees

B.A. in Economics and International Business;

M.S. in Engineering, University of Michigan;

M.B.A., Wayne State University

Career Highlights

  Worked for Johnson Controls Power Solutions, the global leader in automotive lead-acid and advanced batteries, from 2007 through 2017, served as Group Vice President of Engineering & Product Development from 2013 through 2017, and Vice President of Technology and Innovation from 2009 to 2013. She served as Vice President and General Manager for Johnson Controls Hybrid Systems business and as CEO of Johnson Controls-Saft from 2007 through 2009.

  Previously served as Executive Vice President Engineering, Product Development, Commercial and Program Management for Collins & Aikman Corporation

  Served as Director, Sustainable Mobility Technologies and Hybrid Vehicle Programs at Ford Motor Company from 1988 through 2005; Chief Engineer of the 2005 Ford Escape Hybrid, the industry’s first full hybrid SUV; led the launch of Ford’s first hydrogen-powered fuel cell fleet program

  Owner of TechGoddess, LLC, a technical consulting firm

  Board Chair of the Friends of Animals for Metro Detroit

Ms. Wright was selected to serve on our Board because of her extensive experience and her knowledge of the automotive industry, having been named one of the “Leading 100 Women in the Automotive Industry” by Automotive News. Her unique business, manufacturing, engineering and technology background and her extensive global automotive experience make her well qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

Our Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR“FOR” the Election of each of the Nominees for Director.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
  

LOGO


LOGO

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  3424


Back to Contents
Proposal 2Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

LOGO

 

Pursuant toProxy Statement 2022  |  25

PROPOSAL 2

Advisory Vote on Executive

Compensation

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act, our stockholders are entitledshareholders have the opportunity to cast an annual advisory vote at the Annual Meeting to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. As an advisory vote, this Proposal 2 is not binding on Group 1, our Board or the Compensation Committee, will not overrule any previous decisions made by our Board orCHR Committee. However, the Compensation Committee, or require our Board or the Compensation Committee to take any future or remedial action. Although the vote is non-binding, the CompensationCHR Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future compensation decisions regarding our named executive compensation decisions.

officers.

Our Board recognizes that executive compensation is an important matter for our stockholders.shareholders. As described in detail inyou consider this Proposal 2, we urge you to read the CD&A section of this proxy statement for additional details on executive compensation, including the Compensationmore detailed information about our compensation philosophy and objectives, the decisions made by the CHR Committee is taskedin 2021, and the tabular disclosures regarding our named executive officers’ compensation together with the implementationaccompanying narrative disclosures in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement.

As described in the CD&A, we believe our compensation program is effective, appropriate and strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our executiveshareholders and that the total compensation philosophy. The core of that philosophy has been and continuespackage provided to be to pay our named executive officers compensation that is competitive with amounts paid by our peer companies based on individual and Company performance. In particular, the Compensation Committee strives to attract, retain and motivate talented executives, to reward past performance measured against established goals and provide incentives for future performance, and to align executives’ long-term interests with the interests(including potential payouts upon a termination or change of our stockholders. To do so, the Compensation Committee uses a combination of short- and long-term incentive compensation to reward near-term performance and to encourage our executives’ commitment to our long-range, strategic business goals. It is always the intention of the Compensation Committee that our named executive officers be compensated competitively and in a manner thatcontrol) is consistent with market practice. We also believe our strategy, sound corporate governance principles,executive compensation is reasonable and stockholder interests and concerns. Our Board believes that our compensation policies and practices are effective in achieving our Company’s goals of rewarding sustained financial and operating performance, leadership excellence and aligning the executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders.

competitive.

We believe that it is appropriate to seek the views of our stockholdersshareholders on the design and effectiveness of our executive compensation program, and we value your opinion. Based on the stockholdershareholder vote on the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation that took place at our 20182019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,Shareholders, our Board determined to continue holding the vote on executive compensation annually until the next stockholdershareholder vote on the frequency of such advisory vote.

At our 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, 96%Shareholders, 97% of the shares voted on the say-on-pay vote (as defined below) were in favor of the compensation paid to our named executive officers. The CompensationCHR Committee believes this vote strongly endorses the compensation philosophy, policies and practices of the Company and, therefore, it did not make any significant changes in the structure of our executive compensation program as a result of this say-on-pay vote, other than the planned introduction of performance shares into the mix of long-term incentives in 2019, a best practice in executive compensation.

As described in the CD&A, we believe our compensation program is effective, appropriate and strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders and that the total compensation package provided to our named executive officers (including potential payouts upon a termination or change of control) is consistent with market practice. We also believe our executive compensation is reasonable and not excessive. In fact, as a result of continuing challenging economic conditions in our Oklahoma and Texas markets, management received no increases to base compensation in 2016 or 2017 and, salaries for 2016 and 2017 remained at the 2015 levels. In November 2017, the Committee elected to increase the base salaries for our named executive officers to become effective January 1, 2018, following record sales and record adjusted diluted earnings per share in 2017.

As you consider this Proposal 2, we urge you to read the CD&A section of this proxy statement for additional details on executive compensation, including the more detailed information about our compensation philosophy and objectives and the past compensation of our named executive officers, and to review the tabular disclosures regarding our named executive officers’ compensation together with the accompanying narrative disclosures in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement.

say-on-pay vote.

In light of these reasons, we are recommending that our stockholdersshareholders vote“FOR” “FOR” the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to our Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby Approved.”

Our Board of Directors Recommends a Vote“FOR” “FOR” the Non-Binding Advisory Approval of our Executive Compensation.

LOGO


LOGO

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  3526


Back to Contents
Proposal 3Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

LOGO

Proxy Statement 2022  |  27

PROPOSAL 3

Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Our

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Youngreappointed Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and as auditors of the Company’s consolidated financials for 2022. The Audit Committee reviews the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm annually. In making the determination to re-appoint Deloitte for 2022, the Audit Committee considered, among other factors, the independence and performance of Group 1 forDeloitte, and the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. We have been advised by Ernst & Young thatquality and candor of Deloitte’s communications with the Audit Committee and management. Deloitte has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has no relationship with Group 1 or its subsidiaries other than that arising from the firm’s engagement as auditors, tax advisors and consultants.since 2020. Representatives of Ernst & YoungDeloitte will be present atduring the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement and respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.shareholders.

Audit and Other Fees

Set forth below is a summary of certain fees accrued by Ernst & Young, which has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2002, for services related to the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018. In determining the independence of Ernst & Young, the Audit Committee considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young’s independence.

Type of Fees 2018 2017 
Audit Fees(1)  $  2,594,000$  2,526,000 
Audit Related Fees(2)    
Tax Fees(3)  79,000 162,000 
All Other Fees(4)  2,200 2,200 
TOTAL$  2,675,200 $  2,690,200 
(1)Audit fees consisted of amounts accrued for services performed in association with the annual financial statement audit (including required quarterly reviews) for 2017 and 2018, and other procedures required to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to be able to form an opinion on our consolidated financial statements, as well as specific procedures performed by Ernst & Young in connection with their review of our internal control structure in accordance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act. Other procedures included consultations relating to the audit or quarterly reviews. Also included in audit fees are amounts accrued for assurance and related services that are related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, consisting primarily of statutory audits, services performed in connection with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in connection with securities. Audit fees exclude reimbursed expenses of $35,900 and $40,000 for 2017 and 2018, respectively, to Ernst & Young in conjunction with their services.
(2)There were no audit related fees in 2017 or 2018.
(3)Tax fees consisted of amounts billed in 2017 and 2018 for tax preparation and compliance services.
(4)Other fees consisted of amounts accrued in 2017 and 2018 for subscriptions to Ernst & Young’s online accounting and financial reporting research tool.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  36
Back to Contents

The Audit Committee considers whether the provision of these services is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young’s independence, and has determined such services for fiscal 2017 and 2018 were compatible. All of the services described above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c) (7)(ii)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act, to the extent that rule was applicable during fiscal 2017 and 2018.

The Audit Committee has established a policy requiring pre-approval by the Audit Committee of all services (audit and non-audit) to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with this policy, the Audit Committee has given its annual approval for the provision of audit services by Ernst & Young, and has also given its approval for up to a year in advance for the provision by Ernst & Young of particular categories or types of audit-related, tax and permitted non-audit services, in each case subject to a specific budget.

Any proposed services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm not covered by one of these approvals, including proposed services exceeding pre-approved budget levels, requires special pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to management. All of the services listed above were pre-approved pursuant to this policy.

The ratification of our Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 requires our receiving the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal. Although ratification is not required, by our bylaws or otherwise, as a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking our stockholdersshareholders to approve the selection of Ernst & YoungDeloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm. If the selection is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interest and the best interest of our stockholders.

shareholders.

Our Board of Directors recommends a vote“FOR” “FOR” Ratification of the Appointment of ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2019.2022.

FEES PAID TO AUDITORS

The following table shows the fees paid to Deloitte for services related to the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021. In determining the independence of Deloitte, the Audit Committee considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining Deloitte’s independence.

   

Type of Fees

  2021   2020 

Audit Fees1

  $2,740,000   $2,125,000 

Audit Related Fees2

   125,000    100,000 

Tax Fees3

   140,000    308,000 

All Other Fees4

        

TOTAL

  $3,005,000   $2,533,000 
1

Audit fees consisted of amounts accrued for services performed in association with the integrated audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for 2020 and 2021, and attestation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (including required quarterly reviews). Other procedures included consultations on audit or accounting matters that arise during or as a result of the audit or quarterly reviews. Audit fees for 2021 also include fees related to acquisition and divestiture activity during the year. Also included in audit fees are amounts accrued for assurance and related services that are related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, consisting primarily of statutory audits. Audit fees exclude reimbursed expenses of $63,000 and $85,000 for 2020 and 2021, respectively, in conjunction with their services.

2

Included in Audit Related Fees are amounts for services that are related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, consisting primarily of statutory audits, services performed in connection with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or documents issued in connection with securities offerings.

3

Tax fees consisted of amounts billed in 2020 and 2021 for tax planning and consultation and tax compliance services.

4

There were no other fees in 2020 or 2021.

LOGO


LOGO

The Audit Committee considered whether the provision of these services was compatible with maintaining Deloitte’s independence and has determined such services for fiscal 2020 and 2021 were compatible. All of the services described above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act.

The Audit Committee has established a policy requiring pre-approval by the Audit Committee of all services (audit and non-audit) to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with this policy, the Audit Committee had given its annual approval for the provision of audit services by Deloitte for 2020 and 2021 and had also given its approval for up to a year in advance for the provision of particular categories or types of audit-related, tax and permitted non-audit services, in each case subject to a specific budget.

Any proposed services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm not covered by one of these approvals, including proposed services exceeding pre-approved budget levels, requires special pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to management. All of the services listed above were pre-approved pursuant to this policy.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  3728


Back to Contents

LOGO

Proxy Statement 2022  |  29

Report of the Audit Committee

 

The Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to our accounting policies, reporting policies, internal controls, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, selection of the independent registered public accounting firm and the integrity of Group 1’s financial reports. The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of its Nominating/Governance & Corporate Responsibility Committee, has determined that each member of the Audit Committee has the requisite independence and other qualifications for audit committee membership under New York Stock Exchange corporate governance listing standards, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee Charter and the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines.

The Audit Committee acts under ahas the duties and powers described in its written charter adopted and approved by the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee reviews and reassesses the adequacyA copy of the charter on an annual basis. Based on the recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board approved the Audit Committee charter at a regularly scheduled meeting in February 2019. The Audit Committee charter is posted on our Investor Relations website,www.group1auto.comwww.group1corp.com, and you may obtain a printed copy of the Audit Committee charter by sending a written request to Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77024, Attn: Corporate Secretary.

The Audit Committee assists the Board’s oversight and monitoring of the Company’s system of internal controls, including the internal audit function. The Audit Committee discussed with our internal auditors the overall scope and plans for the 20182021 audit. At each Audit Committee meeting, the Audit Committee is provided the opportunity to meet with the internal auditor with, and without, management present. During 2018,2021, management made updates to its internal control documentation for changes in internal control and completed its testing and evaluation of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting in response to the requirements set forth in Section 404 of the Sarbanes OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulations. The Audit Committee has kept apprised of the progress of the evaluation and provided oversight and advice to management during the process. In connection with this oversight, the Audit Committee received updates provided by management and the independent auditor at each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting and met in executive session separately with the internal and the independent auditor to discuss the results of their examinations, observations and recommendations regarding internal control over financial reporting.

The independent registered public accounting firm is accountable to the Audit Committee, and the Audit Committee has the ultimate authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee engages in an annual evaluation of the independent public accounting firm’s qualifications, assessing the firm’s quality of service, the firm’s sufficiency of resources, the quality of the communication and interaction with the firm, and the firm’s independence. The Audit Committee makes its selection based on the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.shareholders. The Audit Committee participates in the selection and annual evaluation of the leadLead Audit Partner (the “Lead Partner”) of the independent registered public accounting firm through its review of the Lead Partner’s professional qualifications, experience, and prior performance on the Company’s audit (if any);, through in-person meetings with the Lead Partner, and through discussion between the Audit Committee and management regarding the selection of the Lead Partner.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm,Deloitte, our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. The Audit Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young LLPDeloitte the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standard No. 1301 “Communications with Audit Committees,” issued bythe applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.Board and the Commission.

Ernst & Young LLPDeloitte submitted to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by Rule 3526the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardCommunication regarding the firm’s communications with the Audit Committees Concerning Independence.Committee concerning its independence. The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLPDeloitte such firm’s independence. The Audit Committee has also considered whether the provision of non-audit services to our Company by Ernst & Young LLP isDeloitte was compatible with maintaining their independence.

LOGO


LOGO

 

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, for filing with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Group 1,

Carin M. Barth (Chairman)(Chair)

Stephen D. Quinn

J. Terry StrangeSteven P. Stanbrook

Charles L. Szews

Anne Taylor

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  3830


Back to Contents

Executive OfficersLOGO

 

Except as described under the heading “Executive Compensation — Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table”, our named executive officers serve at the discretion of our Board. Proxy Statement 2022  |  31

Executive Officers

The following table setsbiographies set forth certain information as of the date of this proxy statement regarding our named executive officers:officers other than Mr. Hesterberg whose biography can be found on page 20:

 

NameAgePosition
Earl J. Hesterberg

LOGO

DARYL A. KENNINGHAM

President, U.S. and Brazilian Operations

Age 57

Appointed in 2019

65President and Chief Executive Officer

Previous Group 1 Positions Held

Daryl A. Kenningham

54President, U.S. Operations from 2017 to 2019

  Regional Vice President – West Region from 2016 to 2017

  Regional Vice President – East Region from 2011 to 2016

Degrees

B.A. in Psychology, University of Michigan; M.B.A, University of Florida

John C. Rickel57

Experience

  Prior to joining Group 1, he most recently served as Chief Operating Officer of Ascent Automotive

  Held a variety of executive positions from 1998 to 2011, including Senior Vice President of Gulf States Toyota, President of Gulf States Financial Services, and President of USA Logistics (previously known as Gulf States Transportation)

  Began his career at Nissan Motor Corporation in 1988

LOGO

DANIEL MCHENRY

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Age 47

Appointed in 2020

Previous Group 1 Positions Held

  U.K. Finance Director from 2007 to 2020

Degrees

BSc in Economics, Queens University Belfast; MSc in Accounting & Management, Southampton University

Frank Grese, Jr.67

Experience

  Member of the Association of Chartered and Certified Accountants in the U.K.

  Joined Chandlers BMW in 2004 before its acquisition by Group 1 in 2007

  Prior to entering the auto retail business, he spent five years with KPMG

LOGO


LOGO

LOGO

FRANK GRESE, JR.

Senior Vice President, Training, Operations Support and Employee Communications

Age 70

Appointed in 2022

Previous Group 1 Positions Held

Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Training and Operations Support

Peter C. DeLongchamps58Senior Vice President, Manufacturer Relations, Financial Services & Public Affairs

Mr. Hesterberg’s biographical information may be found on page 31 of this proxy statement. from 2016 to 2021

 

DARYL A. KENNINGHAM

Daryl A. Kenningham has served as President, U.S. Operations since May 2017. Previously, he served as  Regional Vice President of the West Region from February 2016 through April 2017 and as Regional Vice President of the East Region from April 2011 through January 2016. Prior to joining Group 1, he served as the Chief Operating Officer of Ascent Automotive in Houston and previously held a variety of sales, marketing, finance and automotive-logistics positions with Gulf States Toyota. He also held various sales, marketing and vehicle distribution positions in the United States and Japan with Nissan Motor Corporation, where he began his career in 1988. Mr. Kenningham earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Michigan and his Master of Business Administration from the University of Florida.

JOHN C. RICKEL
John C. Rickel was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in December 2005. From 1984 until joining Group 1, Mr. Rickel held a number of executive and managerial positions of increasing responsibility with Ford Motor Company, a global manufacturer and distributor of cars, trucks and automotive parts. He most recently served as Controller, Ford Americas, where he was responsible for the financial management of Ford’s western hemisphere automotive operations. Immediately prior to that, he was Chief Financial Officer of Ford Europe, where he oversaw all accounting, financial planning, information services, tax and investor relations activities. Mr. Rickel serves on the Board of Directors, on the Audit Committee and as Chair of the Governance Committee of U.S. Xpress, a large truckload carrier providing services primarily throughout the United States. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Rickel was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Ford Russia, and a member of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of Ford Otosan, a publicly traded automotive company located in Turkey and owned 41% by Ford. Mr. Rickel received his B.S.B.A. and M.B.A. from The Ohio State University.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  39
FRANK GRESE, JR.
Frank Grese, Jr. was appointed Senior Vice President of Human Resources, Training and Operations Support effective February 1, 2016. Prior to that appointment, Mr. Grese served as Regional Vice President of the West Region from January 2006 to January 2016 and served as the

  Platform President of Group 1 Atlanta from December 2004 to December 2005. Mr. Grese began2005

Degrees

B.A. in Journalism, University of Georgia

Experience

  Immediately prior to joining Group 1 in 2004, he served as Director of Dealership Operations for a large, private dealer group

  Previously held various executive positions, including Chief Operating Officer and District President, with large public and private dealer groups

  Joined Nissan in 1982, where he ultimately served as National Dealer Advertising Manager until 1986

  Began his automotive career in the Ford Management Training Program in 1974 where he progressed through various assignments in district offices as well as Ford headquarters in Detroit. He joined Nissan in 1982 where he ultimately held the position of National Dealer Advertising Manager. In 1986, Mr. Grese left the manufacturer side of the business and began working in various executive positions, including chief operating officer and district president, with large public and private dealer groups. He last served as Director of Dealership Operations, working extensively with underperforming stores, for a large private dealer group. Mr. Grese graduated from the University of Georgia with a degree in journalism.

 

 

LOGO

PETER C. DELONGCHAMPS

Peter C. DeLongchamps has served as Group 1’s

Senior Vice President, Manufacturer Relations, Financial Services and Public Affairs since January 2018. He previously served as

Age 61

Appointed in 2018

Previous Group 1’s1 Positions Held

  Vice President, Manufacturer Relations, Financial Services and Public Affairs from January 2012 through Decemberto 2017 and as

  Vice President, Manufacturer Relations and Public Affairs from January 2006 through December 2011. Mr. DeLongchamps served asto 2011

  Vice President, Manufacturer Relations from July 2004 through December 2005. Mr. DeLongchamps beganto 2005

Degrees

B.B.A. in Marketing, Baylor University

Experience

  Prior to joining Group 1, he was President of Advantage BMW, a Houston-based automotive retailer, from 1997 to 2004

  Began his automotive retailing career in 1980, having served asheld several positions, including District Manager for General Motors Corporation and Regional Operations Manager for BMW of North America as well as various other management positions in the automotive industry. Immediately prior to joining Group 1 in 2004, he was President of Advantage BMW, a Houston-based automotive retailer. Mr. DeLongchamps also serves

  Serves on the Board of Directors of Junior Achievement of Southeast Texas. Mr. DeLongchamps received his B.B.A. from Baylor University.Texas, Houston Christian High School and the Texas Bowl

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  4032


Back to Contents

2018 Compensation Discussion and AnalysisLOGO

 

ThisProxy Statement 2022  |  33

2021 Compensation Discussion

and Analysis

Following the unprecedented events of 2020, Group 1 adapted, evolved, and emerged stronger as a Company in 2021. Our team worked tirelessly to navigate the unique challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially supply chain disruptions, by maintaining strong cost control and preserving liquidity, while making significant investments to increase the size and improve the strength of our Company. As a result of these efforts, the Company achieved record sales and profits. Our strong performance was the result of an experienced, focused management team and dedicated employees that responded to the challenges we faced.

This CD&A provides a detailed description of our executive compensation philosophy, and programs, the compensation decisions the Compensation Committee has made under those programs and the factors considered in making those decisions.compensation determinations of the CHR Committee. As discussed in greater detail below, our compensation plans are designed to reward our named executive officers for the achievement of these results for our Company and our stockholders.results. The Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A focuses on the compensation of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2018,2021, who were:

 

Earl J. Hesterberg — President and Chief Executive Officer;
Daryl A. Kenningham — President, U.S. Operations;
John C. Rickel — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
Frank Grese, Jr. — Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Training and Operations Support; and
Peter C. DeLongchamps — Senior Vice President, Manufacturer Relations, Financial Services and Public Affairs.

Earl J. Hesterberg

President and Chief Executive Officer;

Daryl A. Kenningham

President, U.S. and Brazilian Operations;

Daniel McHenry

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;

Frank Grese, Jr.

Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Training and Operations Support; and

Peter C. DeLongchamps

Senior Vice President, Manufacturer Relations, Financial Services and Public Affairs.

 

Compensation and Corporate GovernanceCOMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Committee continuously reviews best practices inOur executive compensation and has made several adjustmentsgovernance programs are designed to elements of our compensation programslink pay with operational performance and increases in long-term shareholder value while minimizing incentives that could lead to excessive risk-taking. We have adopted the following policies and practices over the past several yearstime to further align our executive compensation structure with our stockholders’ interests and current governance practices, including:accomplish such objectives:

Compensation Highlights

No Excise Tax

Gross-Ups

No Single-Trigger

Equity Vesting

Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote

Conducted Annually

Robust Stock Ownership

Guidelines for Our Officers

and Directors

Company Policy Prohibits

Directors and Employees from

Pledging or Hedging Group 1

Common Stock

Independent Compensation

Consultant

Performance-Based Shares

Clawback Provisions for

Certain Restatements

Incentive Program Includes

Both Financial and

Mission-Based Goals

LOGO


LOGO

 

ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS& HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE, ITS CONSULTANT AND MANAGEMENT

Role of the CompensationThe CHR Committee its Consultant and Management

Our Board has entrusted the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) with overall responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring our executive compensation program. Our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President, of Human Resources, Training and Operations Support alsowork with the CHR Committee to implement and promote our executive compensation strategy and play a role in the implementation of the executive compensation process, by overseeing the performance and dynamics of the executive team and generally keepinginforming the Committee informed.CHR Committee. All final decisions regarding our named executive officers’ compensation remain with the CHR Committee, except in the case of our Chief Executive Officer. Based on a performance evaluation, the CHR Committee reviews and recommends the compensation for our Chief Executive Officer wherefor approval by the independent members of the Board make all decisions with the benefit of recommendations from the Committee.

Board.

The CHR Committee has engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“PM&P”), an executive compensation firm, to serve as its independent compensation consultant and to advise on executive compensation matters. In 2018, PM&P was engaged to conduct a competitive compensation analysis for the named executive officers. During that time, PM&P reviewedreviews compensation data for our peer companies (“Peer Companies”) in comparison to our current compensation practices and mademakes compensation recommendations to the CHR Committee. The Committee retainsBased on the analysis of PM&P, no changes were recommended to the Company’s current peer group of companies for 2021. PM&P attends certain meetings of the CHR Committee and has discussions with members of the CHR Committee or its Chair throughout the year to assist with the review and discussion of executive compensation matters.

PM&P is an independent compensation consulting firm and does not provide any other services to us outside of matters pertaining to executive officer and director compensation. PM&P reports directly althoughto the CHR Committee, which is the sole party responsible for determining the scope of services performed by PM&P and the directions given to PM&P regarding the performance of such services. However, in carrying out assignments PM&P may interact with our management when necessary and appropriate.

In February 2022, the CHR Committee considered the independence of PM&P doesin light of SEC rules and listing standards of the NYSE. The CHR Committee requested and received a letter from PM&P addressing the consulting firm’s independence, including the factors set forth in the listing standards of the NYSE. The CHR Committee discussed these considerations, among other things, and concluded that the work of PM&P did not provideraise any services to our Company other than its consulting services to the Committee, and the Committee determined that no conflict of interest exists between PM&P and our Company. Please see “Information About our Board of Directors and its Committees — interest.

CALIBRATING OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Committee” for additional information on the role of the Committee, its consultant and management in setting executive compensation.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  41

Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program

COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

Philosophy

The CHR Committee believes that the most effective executive compensation program is one designed to recruit, retainbe reasonable and motivate capable leadershipcompetitive, and rewardshould balance our goal of attracting, motivating, rewarding and retaining top-performing senior executives with our goal of aligning their interests with those individuals upon the achievement of their personal and departmental objectives, as well as upon our Company’s achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals.shareholders. The CHR Committee annually evaluates both market competitiveness, as well as individual and Company performance,our executive compensation program to ensure that we maintainit is consistent with our ability to attract, retainshort-term and motivate talented employeeslong-term goals. We provide short-term incentive compensation opportunities in key positions.the form of annual cash bonuses, which focus on our achievement of annual corporate goals. We also provide long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of equity awards, which have historically consisted primarily of restricted stock and performance-based shares, with time-based vesting provisions. By maintaining competitive compensation and rewarding for performance, the CHR Committee strives to support our overall business objectives and provide our stockholdersshareholders with a superioran attractive rate of return over time.

Our strategic business focus during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021, consisted of the following objectives:

 

increase total same store gross profit through focused efforts in the new vehicle, used vehicle, finance and insurance, parts, service and collision departments;

 increasing total same store gross profit through efforts in the new vehicle, used vehicle, finance and insurance, parts, service and collision departments;
continuing

continue to consolidatestandardize key operating processes and systems to improve our customer responsiveness, provide omni-channel sales abilities (AcceleRide®), create greater efficiencies and reduce expenses;

maintaining a cost level that aligns with the anticipated level of business activity; and
seeking strategic portfolio management opportunities within the automotive retail market so that we can continue to optimize our business operations in the U.S., the U.K. and Brazil.

 

maintain a cost level that aligns with the anticipated level of business activity;

implement additional health and safety measures to protect our employees and customers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic;

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  34


Proxy Statement 2022  |  35

seek strategic acquisition and divestiture opportunities within the automotive retail market so that we can continue to optimize our business operations in the U.S. and the U.K.; and

maintain a balanced capital allocation strategy including share repurchases, dividends and effective capital spending.

Our named executive officers’ individual or departmentalfunctional goals for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021, generally consisted of one or more of the following criteria, which provide support for our business objectives:

 

 sustain sales momentum;
maximize strategies of recently acquired dealership operations;
continue to strengthen our processes and management for improved operating effectiveness and efficiency;
control costs and expenses as sales levels fluctuate;
dispose of underperforming dealerships and deploy the proceeds into other capital appreciation opportunities with better return potential; and
drive the capital allocation process, which seeks investments that maximize return to our stockholders.

sustain sales momentum;

 

STOCKHOLDER INPUT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION MATTERSmaximize performance of recently acquired dealership operations;

 

In accordancecontinue to strengthen our processes and management for improved operating effectiveness and efficiency;

control costs and expenses as sales levels fluctuate;

dispose of underperforming dealerships and deploy the proceeds into other capital opportunities with applicable law and as described in more detail in Proposal 2 above, our stockholders havebetter returns;

drive the rightcapital allocation process, which seeks to vote, on an advisory non-binding basis, on the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers at specified intervals (the “say-on-pay vote”). Stockholders last voted on this matter at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. In accordance with the frequency vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders we hold our say-on-pay vote every year. In 2018, 96% of the votes cast were in favor of our executive compensation program; therefore the Committee did not make any significant changesmaximize returns to our compensation program as a result of such a vote, other than the planned introduction of performance shares into the mix of long-term incentives in 2019, a best practice in executive compensation. The Committee will continue to consider on an annual basis the vote results for say-on-pay proposals when making compensation decisions for our named executive officers.shareholders; and

 

In addition to such consideration given to the results of the say-on-pay vote, at various times throughout the year the Committee considers any input it may receive from stockholdersidentify and other stakeholders, and more general developments in executive compensation principles, in the development and implementation of the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, policies and programs. For additional information on the say-on-pay vote with respect to the compensation paid to our named executive officers in 2018, see Proposal 2 above.successfully close acquisition targets.

Market Analysis

MARKET ANALYSIS

We engaged PM&P to conduct an independent market-based analysis of our executive compensation program in 2018. The&P’s market analysis process involvedinvolves the comparison of long-term, short-term andthe total compensation elements (base, annual incentive, long-term incentive and executive perquisites) with a selected group of peer companies (“Peer Companies”). Compensation data was compared at the 25th, 50thand 75thpercentiles of the market.

Companies.

While we do not think it is appropriate to establish compensation based solely on market analysis, we believe that the practice of comparing our compensation program to the programs of our peers can be useful for two reasons. First, our compensation practices must be competitive in order to attract and retain executives with the ability and experience necessary to provide leadership and to deliver strong performance to our stockholders.shareholders. Second, comparisoncomparative analysis allows us to assess the reasonableness of our compensation practices. This process allows us to achieve one of our primary objectivesobjective of maintaining competitive compensation, to ensure retention and assists inwhile aligning compensation with stockholdershareholder interests.

Our Peer Companies include all of the publicly traded automotive consolidators and specialty retailers associated with automotive sales, and automotive parts and service against whom we most directly compete for executive talent.compete. The list of our Peer Companies is periodically reviewed and updated by the Committee. Our 2018 Peer CompaniesThe Committee discussed the Company’s peer group with PM&P in 2021. Based on that discussion, no changes were made to the Company’s peer group of companies for 2021, which were:

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  

42
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

Lithia Motors, Inc.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.

LKQ Corporation

AutoNation, Inc.

O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.

AutoZone, Inc.

Penske Automotive Group, Inc.

CarMax, Inc.

Rush Enterprises, Inc.

Genuine Parts Company

Sonic Automotive, Inc.

LOGO


LOGO

 

When evaluating the compensation data and making compensation decisions, the CHR Committee has taken into consideration the variance in revenue size among the entities comprising our Peer Companies. Additionally, when calculating a market value, the CHR Committee has considered other differences between us and our Peer Companies and us, such as corporate structure, tenure of officers, variance in scope of duties for each officer and other factors when calculating a market value. This value is used as the basis of comparison of compensation provided by us and our Peer Companies.factors. However, any application of market analysis data is tempered by our basic staffing philosophy, which is to remain as lean as practical. This guiding principle results in certain of our named executive officers having a broad range of job responsibilities, which, at certain of our Peer Companies, may be divided among multiple executive officers. The CHR Committee’s use of market analysis data for specific compensation components is described in more detail below.

Comprehensive Compensation Reviews

TALLY SHEETS

In 2018,The CHR Committee and PM&P reviewed a variety of data points and information when making 2021 executive compensation tally sheets fordecisions, including historical and estimated future compensation values, in order to get a thorough understanding of realizable pay in various circumstances. Our human resources department was able to prepare a historical compensation analysis of realizable compensation (rather than the grant date or accounting values that may have been presented in previous compensation tables) that our named executive officers were prepared by our Compensation Managerhave received over the last year, as well as the hypothetical value of compensation and reviewed bybenefits that could become payable upon both voluntary and involuntary termination scenarios or upon a change in control event. This information assisted the Committee. This review consistsCHR Committee in determining whether the structure of a twelve month summarypay for the 2021 year would be market-based, fair and appropriate, as well as to determine the desired mix of cash compensation earned, employee benefits provided, stock granted (with value at grant), and value of stock released (with value at release). Total shares and present value of unvested restricted stock is also presented for review. In addition to the PM&P market analysis, information from these tally sheets was also considered by the Committee in makingequity-based compensation decisions for the 2021 year.

2021 Say-on-Pay Vote Results

Our shareholders have the right to vote, on an advisory non-binding basis, on the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as well as guidingat specified intervals (the “say-on-pay vote”). In accordance with the designfrequency vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting of cash and non-cashShareholders we hold our say-on-pay vote every year. In 2021, 97% of the votes cast were in favor of our executive compensation and benefit programs.program; therefore, the CHR Committee did not make any significant changes to our compensation program or our general compensation philosophy following the vote. The Committee specifically used tally sheets inwill continue to consider on an annual basis the following contextsvote results for each named executive officer:

To determine the historical value of compensation paid;
To determine the value of restricted stock awards forfeited in the event of a voluntary terminationsay-on-pay proposals when making compensation decisions regarding grants to encourage retention;
To understand total compensation potentially payable to the named executive officers under all possible scenarios, including death/disability, retirement, voluntary termination, termination with and without cause and changes of control; and
To ensure that the structure of pay at different levels is fair and appropriate.

Compensation Components

Our compensation program for our named executive officers includesand in setting our compensation goals and philosophy.

In addition to such consideration given to the results of the say-on-pay vote, at various times throughout the year the CHR Committee considers input from shareholders and other stakeholders as well as more general developments in executive compensation principles. The CHR Committee uses this information to develop and implement the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, policies and programs. For additional information on the say-on-pay vote with respect to the compensation paid to our named executive officers in 2021, see Proposal 2 above.

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  36


Proxy Statement 2022  |  37

COMPENSATION COMPONENTS

Compensation Program Structure

Our executive compensation program consists of annual cash compensation and long-term equity-based compensation. Annual cash compensation consists of annual base salary and payments under ouran annual cash incentive plan. Our long-term equity-based compensation consists of both restricted stock and performance-based equity awards, made under our long-term incentive plan.

with time-based vesting parameters. In addition, our named executive officers are eligible to (i) participate in our health and welfare plans, our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and our retirement plans (401(k) Savings Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan), (ii) receive a vehicle allowance and/or demonstrator vehicle(s), depending on the position held, and (iii) receive limited perquisites and other personal benefits as described under “Other Benefits” below.

Named executive officer compensation is composed of four primary components:

BASE SALARY

Long-Term Incentive

Base Salary

+

Annual Cash Incentive Plan

+

Performance Shares

+

Restricted Stock

Competitive pay to attract and retain talented executives

An opportunity to earn an annual cash award based on the Company’s financial performance and mission-based business objectives; there will be no payout unless a minimum financial goal is achieved

A mix of restricted stock and performance-based shares, with time-based vesting provisions, to align management’s interests with long-term shareholders’ interests

LOGO

LOGO


LOGO

 

DesignBase Salary

Design

We provide our named executive officers with ana competitive annual base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the year. Our goal is to set base salaries for our named executive officers at levels that are competitive with comparable companies for the skills, experience, and requirements of similar positions, using market analysis as previously discussed, in order to attract and retain top talent. In order toTo achieve this goal, we have generally sought to provideset base salaries that fall near the 50thpercentile of our Peer Companies. We believe this supports competitive compensation and ensures retention. In order to ensure that each officer is appropriately compensated, the Committee, when setting base salaries, considers individual performance, tenure and experience and our financial performance in addition to the compensation review of the Peer Companies. Individual base salary levels are generally reviewed each November and are adjusted as appropriate based on an analysis of current market salary levels at the Peer Companies, local market conditions, individual performance and experience, and our financial performance.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  43

2021 Results and Fiscal 2022 Changes

Following the comprehensive compensation review, and considering certain economic conditions impacting the Company at that time, the CHR Committee approved a 3% increase to the base salaries for our named executive officers, except for Mr. Hesterberg whose increase was approved by the independent directors of the Board. The increases became effective January 1, 2021.

In November 2017,2021, after reviewing and discussing a competitive analysis prepared by PM&P, the tally sheets and certain economic conditions affecting the Company, the Committee discussed with Mr. Hesterberg the appropriate base compensation levels for the Company’s named executive officers other than himself. The Committee noted that due to challenging economic conditions in some of the Company’s key markets, base salaries for the named executive officers were not changed for 2016 or 2017, and remained at the 2015 base compensation levels. In November 2017, theCHR Committee elected to increaseadjust the base salaries for our named executive officers, effective January 1, 20182022 to levels that remainremained near the 50thpercentile compensation of our Peer Companies. Accordingly, the base salaries for Messrs. Hesterberg, Kenningham, Rickel, Grese and DeLongchamps were increased to $1,150,000, $624,000, $599,700, $572,500 and $478,300, respectively.

Compensation Changes for Fiscal 2019

In November 2018, the Committee elected to increase the base salaries for our named executive officers (with the exception of Mr. Hesterberg) effective January 1, 2019, to levels that remain near the 50th50th percentile compensation of our Peer Companies. Accordingly, the base salaries for our named executive officers were increasedadjusted as follows:noted in the table below. Mr. Grese’s salary for 2022 reflects a change in his responsibilities, as effective January 1, 2022, he is no longer responsible for Human Resources.

 

 2018 Base Salary 2019 Base Salary 
Named Executive Officer ($) ($)  

2021 Base Salary

($)

   

2022 Base Salary

($)

 
Earl J. Hesterberg 1,150,000  1,150,000    1,240,000    1,265,000 
Daryl A. Kenningham 624,000 655,200    760,000    775,000 
John C. Rickel 599,700 629,700 

Daniel McHenry

   575,000    620,000 
Frank Grese, Jr. 572,500 595,400    633,450    596,119 
Peter C. DeLongchamps 478,300  492,650    530,450    541,059 

ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Annual Incentive Compensation Plan

Annual cash incentive awards are intended to align our annual performance and results with the compensation paid to persons who are most responsible for such performance, and to motivate and reward achievement of Company and individual or departmentalfunctional performance objectives. Meaningful, performance-related goals are established so that attaining or exceeding the performance targets is not assured, requires significant effort by each of our named executive officers, and if accomplished, contributes to the ongoing overall improvement and success of the Company.

For 2018,2021, the annual incentive compensation plan was based upon achievement of financial and individual, or departmental,mission-based, goals approved at the beginning of the year by the CHR Committee. The financial and mission-based portions of the annual incentive awards could be awarded independently so that achievement of one was not predicated on the achievement of the other. There is, however, a minimum earnings per share goallevel established by the CHR Committee at the beginning of each year which has tomust be achieved before any incentive award is paid.

 

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  38


Proxy Statement 2022  |  39

The following is a description of the 20182021 performance metrics under the annual incentive compensation plan:

Financial Goal

The CHR Committee meets in November to determine appropriate financial metrics for the upcoming year, and has a general compensation philosophy of setting challenging, yet attainable, performance goals. PM&P provides the CHR Committee with market data and other information about the Company’s peers, which the CHR Committee reviews in the context of the Company’s short-term and long-term strategy, along with the metrics used in previous years. The CHR Committee evaluates information and analyses provided by management and PM&P to assess which metrics are expected to properly motivate management to produce short-term and long-term value for its shareholders.

For 2018, theThe CHR Committee selected adjusted net income* as our financial goal portionfor the 2021 annual incentive compensation plan. In setting the 2021 annual incentive award performance goal, the Committee considered historical performance levels, industry trends and forecasts, and our strategic plan. The Committee believes that this financial performance measure is effective and appropriate because it reflects income statement performance, which is consistent with the interests of our shareholders. The Committee selected this metric to be transparent and to provide clarity and consistency in calculating the cash incentive award. When set, threshold was considered achievable, target was considered challenging yet attainable and maximum was considered possible, but not without significant effort.

Under the 2021 annual incentive compensation plan, was based on achievement of diluted earnings per share (“EPS”). Diluted earnings per share is generally defined as our net income available to diluted common shares divided by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus those that would have been outstanding, assuming issuance for all dilutive potential common shares. Under the 2018 annual incentive compensation plan, theCHR Committee may, in its sole discretion, adjust the Company’s EPSadjusted net income when determining achievement of the financial goal metric for extraordinary or unusual items that would be included in our annual operating results, but not typically considered at the time the targets were set, such as certain asset impairments or extraordinary dilutive events which materially affect EPS.

The Committee believes that EPS is the best metric for our financial goal portion of the annual incentive compensation plan, because it incentivizes our named executive officers to maximize stockholder return and only rewards our named executive officers if our stockholders are rewarded.adjusted net income. Further, no payments are made under the financial goal portion of the award unless a threshold level of EPSadjusted net income is achieved. The threshold, target and maximum levels of performance for the EPSadjusted net income metric set by the CHR Committee for 20182021 were as follows:

 

 ThresholdTargetMaximum
 ($)($)($)
EPS$8.20$8.55$8.76
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)

Adjusted Net Income*

260.0 million280.0 million330.0 million
*

Please see Appendix A for an explanation and reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures.

LOGO


LOGO

 

Mission-based Goals

Mission-based goals typically include specific goals that are related to the individual’s functional area and are established at the beginning of each fiscal year jointly by the named executive officer and our Chief Executive Officer and reviewed by the CHR Committee, or in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, by the CHR Committee and the Board. These goals are integral toward achieving key business objectives, such as those listed on page 42pages 34-35 which help improve our financial performance, promote corporate efficiencies and contribute to the growth of our Company. In 2018,2021, the following mission-based goals were assigned to each of our named executive officers:

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  44
NameIndividual/Departmental Performance Targets
Earl J. HesterbergEstablish successful U.K. management structure and headquarters
 Identification of disruptive forces and revise strategy as necessary

Name

Complete brand study and leverage certain brandsIndividual/Functional Performance Targets

Earl J. Hesterberg

 Communicate corporate growth strategy to investment community and execution of same

 Continued focus on technological excellence to improve effectiveness and efficiency of operations

Focus on dispositionhuman capital, including DEI goals and actions; training and development of underperforming stores

recent additions to leadership team

Increase Achieve meaningful growth in U.S. used vehicle gross profit
operations

Increase U.S. aftersales gross profit
 Evaluate strategic options for Brazilian operations

Achieve selling, general and administrative cost reduction target

Daryl A. Kenningham

Decrease employee turnover
  

 Achieve meaningful growth in U.S. used vehicle operations

Increase U.S. aftersales gross profit

Increase U.S. used vehicle gross profit
 Continued focus on technological excellence to improve effectiveness and efficiency of operations

U.S. inventory management
 Continued focus on corporate growth strategy and acquisition eligibility

 Focus on human capital, including DEI goals and actions; continued training and development of operations leadership

Achieve selling, general and administrative cost reduction target

John C. RickelPayroll conversion and implementation

Daniel McHenry

Implementation of new payment solution
  

Further consolidate U.K. Review and update accounting
controls framework through artificial intelligence

Continue deployment of cybersecurity measures
 Evaluate strategic options for Brazilian operations

 Develop funding support plan for strategic growth initiatives

 Develop technological improvements at the business support center

 Focus on human capital, including DEI goals and actions, in succession planning

Achieve selling, general and administrative cost reduction target

Frank Grese, Jr.

Coordinate with procurement department to identify and achieve cost savings goal

Improve employee retention through training, professional development programs and learning opportunities
Support greater employee engagement and development through employee recognition programs
programs; development of DEI Council

Achieve recruiting objectives for various dealership service employees
roles

Develop service appointment rescheduling system; support service development center
 Succession planning to recruit and develop SVP, Chief Human Resources Officer

Expand Enhance and expand employee training program to develop “touch points” for more interaction with new employees
Promoteassist in employee wellness programs through quarterly wellness challenges
development

Achieve selling, general and administrative cost reduction target

Peter C. DeLongchamps

Achieve F&I per retail unit target

Maintain capital expenditure projects within budget while maintaining positive relationships with manufacturers

Implement online F&I product cancellations initiative
Renegotiate key lender agreements Focus on DEI and roll out to U.S. dealerships
ESG initiatives; continued focus on corporate philanthropy efforts

Continued focus on communication and relationships with manufacturers and investment community

 Develop and launch online financial service compliance and training program

Achieve selling, general and administrative cost reduction target

The CHR Committee decideddetermined that for 20182021 as long as earnings per shareadjusted net income was at least $7.25,$238.0 million, the mission-based portion of the award would be payable from 0% to 100% according to individual goal achievement levels. As a result, assuming all mission-based goals were attained, the following table sets forth the threshold, target and maximum annual incentive compensation plan potential payouts for 2018,2021, as a percentage of base salary. The target performance level was set such that, if attained, the total cash compensation paid to our named executive officers would approximate the median paid to named executive officers at our Peer Companies.

 

   How the Annual Incentive is Paid (as a % of Salary)
   Financial Based Total Opportunity
(Assumes 100% Payout on Mission Based)
 Mission         
Named Executive OfficerBased Threshold Target Max  Threshold Target Max 
Earl J. Hesterberg50.0% 16.7% 33.3% 75.0%  66.67% 83.33% 125.00% 
Daryl A. Kenningham50.0% 16.7% 33.3% 75.0%  66.67% 83.33% 125.00% 
John C. Rickel50.0% 16.7% 33.3% 65.0%  66.67% 83.33% 115.00% 
Frank Grese, Jr.50.0% 16.7% 33.3% 65.0%  66.67% 83.33% 115.00% 
Peter C. DeLongchamps50.0% 16.7% 33.3% 65.0%  66.67% 83.33% 115.00% 

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  4540


Back to Contents

Proxy Statement 2022  |  41

  
   How the Annual Incentive is Paid (as a % of Salary) 
         Financial Based     Total Opportunity
(Assumes 100% Payout on
Mission Based)
 

Named Executive Officer

  Mission
Based
      Threshold  Target  Max      Threshold  Target  Max 

Earl J. Hesterberg

   50.0      25.0  50.0  150.0      75.0  100.0  200.0

Daryl A. Kenningham

   50.0      25.0  50.0  100.0      75.0  100.0  150.0

Daniel McHenry

   50.0      16.7  33.3  65.0      66.7  83.3  115.0

Frank Grese, Jr.

   50.0      16.7  33.3  65.0      66.7  83.3  115.0

Peter C. DeLongchamps

   50.0      16.7  33.3  65.0      66.7  83.3  115.0

Results

For 2018,2021, we achieved the maximum level of our financial goal (EPS)(adjusted net income). Adjusted actual EPSnet income was $8.91,$642.2 million, exceeding the maximum target performance level of $8.76.

$330.0 million.

In connection with its review of the performance of our Chief Executive Officer, the CHR Committee determined that Mr. Hesterberg had achieved 100% of his 20182021 mission-based goals, resulting in a 100% payment of the mission-based payout. Following extensive discussion with our Chief Executive Officer regarding his evaluation of the performance of our named executive officers, the CHR Committee determined that the mission-based goals for Messrs. Kenningham, Rickel, GreseMcHenry and DeLongchamps were met, or surpassed their individual and departmental goals, resulting in 100% payout of the mission-based payout.payout, and Messrs. Kenningham and Grese had achieved a 95% and 96% payout, respectively, of their mission-based goals. In making these determinations, the CHR Committee specifically considered each named executive officer’s leadership in achieving each of the goals.

Based on the CHR Committee’s evaluation of the performance of each of our named executive officers, it determined the degree to which each named executive officer had achieved his goals and the following amounts of incentive compensation were paid with respect to the 20182021 year:

 

LOGO

1

The % of salary is based on employee salaries on December 31, 2021.

LOGO


LOGO

 

LONG TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE COMPENSATIONAnnual Incentive Compensation Plan Changes for Fiscal 2022

In January 2022, the CHR Committee with the help of PM&P, reviewed the performance metrics (mission-based and financial-based) under the Company’s Annual Incentive Compensation Plan. The CHR Committee continues to believe that the mission-based goals set for each of the Company’s named executive officers are integral toward achieving key business objectives and contribute to the growth of the Company. The CHR Committee discussed a variety of financial metrics and determined that adjusted annual net income (as disclosed in the fourth quarter earnings release filed with the SEC following year-end), continues to be an appropriate metric for aligning the management team’s financial-based goals with the Company’s success for 2022. In November 2021, the CHR Committee made changes to the annual incentive compensation program for our named executive officers to increase the portion of the annual incentive program based on financial goals from 50% to 70%, and to reduce the portion of the annual incentive program based on mission-based goals from 50% to 30%.

Long Term Equity Incentive Compensation

Design

To align the compensation of our named executive officers with the attainment of our business goals and an increase in stockholdershareholder value, we award long-term equity incentive grants to our named executive officers as part of our total compensation package. These awards have been made pursuant to the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the “LTIP”) and the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan.

.

We believe that restricted stock, subject to time-based vesting requirements, appropriately aligns management’s interests with those of our Company and our stockholders,shareholders, while helping to motivate and retain key members of our management team.

Additionally, beginning in 2019, after extensive discussions between the CHR Committee and PM&P, the CHR Committee determined that the annual equity awards made to certain executive officers should include a performance-based award component. Accordingly, in 2021, 25% (increased to 50% in 2022, as discussed below) of each named executive officer’s equity compensation annual grants under the LTIP were subject to performance-based criteria under performance shares. These performance shares have been granted at the recommendation of PM&P in order to better align our incentive compensation with the incentive compensation of our peers.

When determining the size of the awards, we typically consider amounts that would provide our named executive officers with long-term incentive opportunities that, when performance is above target, results in pay above the median of our peer companies.Peer Companies. We then take into account individual performance, the position and value of the named executive officer to our Company, experience and length of service to us, our desire to incentivize the officer to remain with our Company, and the amount of equity previously awarded to the officer.

Restricted Stock Awards

Vesting of theseequity-based awards isare intended to facilitate retention, and the restricted stock shares vest over a five-year period with the restrictions relating to the awards lapsing 40% after two years and 20% in each year thereafter. Since 2008, our vesting provisions have been based on the passage of time. Under the terms of the current restricted stock award agreements, in the event of death or disability of any employee with unvested awards, all granted but unvested restricted stock awards will automatically vest. Certain qualified retirements will also result in the acceleration of vesting.

For more information on the potential vesting (or forfeiture) of outstanding Restricted Stock Awards, please see the section entitled “Executive Compensation — Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control — GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE 2014 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN.”

Performance Share Awards

We designed 50% of the performance shares or 12.5% (50% x 25%) of the total 2021 annual equity-based grant, to be based on the Company’s return on invested capital (“ROIC”), and 50% of the performance shares of the equity award or 12.5% of the total annual equity-based grant to be based on the Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) relative to a comparator group of five domestic automotive retailers included in the Peer Companies.

 

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  42


Proxy Statement 2022  |  43

These performance criteria are to be measured over a two-year performance period from the beginning of 2021 through the end of 2022. In addition, the 2021 performance share grants are subject to a three-year time-based vesting schedule. As a result, following the end of the two-year performance period, at the February 2023 meeting the CHR Committee will assess performance. Any awards that have satisfied the performance-based criteria will then continue to be subject to the time-based vesting requirement, which lapses at year end. Any 2021 performance shares earned will fully vest on December 31, 2023.

The 2021 awards generally vest from 0% to 200% of the target award granted, based on the ROIC and TSR performance achieved against our Peer Companies. However, the portion of the awards subject to TSR performance were also subject to a cap on the maximum fair market value of the awards that become earned. This maximum value cap would limit the upside value of each award in an environment where the eventstock price has increased substantially above the expected levels at the time of grant, limiting the number of shares that become eligible to be issued to the recipient upon settlement. As a “qualified retirement,” which is a retirement after a minimumresult, the maximum fair market value (determined as of ten yearsthe last day of service with our Company and the executive attainingapplicable performance period) of the age of 63, upon satisfaction of a two year non-compete and certain non-disclosure covenants, all unvested shares of(or restricted stock, or restricted stock units (granted in prior years) held byas further described below) may not exceed four times the fair market value of the target number of shares subject to TSR performance originally granted to the named executive officer (the “Maximum Value”). If the fair market value of the number of such shares (or restricted stock) exceeds that Maximum Value, then the number of TSR-based shares eligible to vest will be reduced to a number of whole shares that is equal to or less than the Maximum Value. However, if on the vesting date for the award, the aggregate fair market value of the shares payable to the individual is less than the Maximum Value, all or a portion of the number of share that were previously reduced due to the cap will become payable to the employee to the extent that the aggregate fair market value of the shares to be issued as of histhe vesting date does not exceed the Maximum Value.

For details regarding the potential vesting (or forfeiture of) the Performance Share Awards, please see the section entitled “Executive Compensation – Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control – GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE 2014 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN.” The performance share agreements under the LTIP for our named executive officers provide that upon a named executive officer’s termination due to death or disability, the performance shares will pay out following the performance period based on actual performance. If a named executive officer’s employment is terminated due to a planned retirement date(generally defined as a mutually agreed upon retirement by the officer and the Company), the performance shares will vest. Provided, however, that beginning with the awards granted in 2018, anyconvert to time-based restricted stock grantedawards that will continue to vest, subject to the officer’s compliance with applicable restrictive covenants, until the second anniversary of the named executive must have been received at least six months prior to his notificationofficer’s termination of his intent to terminate hisemployment. Such a conversion will occur based on the actual performance achieved during the performance period. All other terminations of employment due to Qualified Retirement, and at least six months prior towill result in a forfeiture of the effective retirement date to be eligible for vesting as provided above.performance shares without payment.

LOGO


LOGO

 

20182021 Awards

In February 2018,2021, the CHR Committee reviewed the tally sheets and the competitive analysis prepared by PM&P and the Company’s comprehensive compensation review to determine how each named executive officer’s base salary and total compensation compared to their peers and in order to assesspeers. The CHR Committee also assessed all elements of each executive’s pay relative to total compensation. TheWhen making the decision as to the size of the equity award for each named executive officer the CHR Committee also considered each executive’s current equity position for purposes of reward and retention and considered other factors, such as size of previous awards, contribution to corporate results, leadership and Company performance during the year when making the decision as to the size of the equity award for each named executive officer.year. Based on the analysis and review described above, on February 20, 2018,19, 2021, the CHR Committee granted the following restricted stock and performance share awards to the named executive officers: Mr. Hesterberg (47,371 shares; valued at $3,599,959), Mr. Kenningham (13,000 shares; valued at $987,935),

  
   2021 Long Term Equity Incentive Compensation 

Named Executive Officer

  Restricted
Stock Awards
(#)
   Value1
($)
   Performance
Share
Awards (at
Target)
(#)
   Value
(at
Target)1
($)
 

Earl J. Hesterberg

   19,377    2,849,969    6,459    949,990 

Daryl A. Kenningham

   10,199    1,500,069    3,399    499,925 

Daniel McHenry

   2,550    375,054    849    124,871 

Frank Grese, Jr.

   3,569    524,929    1,189    174,878 

Peter C. DeLongchamps

   4,079    599,939    1,359    199,882 

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  1 46

Value of awards reflect market rates on date of grant.

Mr. Rickel (11,500 shares; valued at $873,943), Mr. Grese (9,000 shares; valued at $683,955) and Mr. DeLongchamps (8,500 shares; valued at $645,958).

For more information on the 20182021 equity awards, please see the section entitled “Executive Compensation — Grants of Plan BasedPlan-Based Awards in 2018.2021.

Compensation Changes for Fiscal 2019

2022

In 2019,November 2021, after extensivereviewing a competitive analysis prepared by PM&P and following discussions betweenwith PM&P , the CompensationCHR Committee andincreased the compensation consultant,mix of performance based long term incentive from 25% to 50%. The financial metrics remained the Compensation Committee determined thatsame, with 25% (50% x 50%) of the total annual equity awards madeequity-based grant, to certain executive officers should include a performance-based award component. Accordingly, 25% of each NEO’s equity compensation under the LTIP will be subject to performance-based criteria, as follows:based on Group 1’s ROIC, and 50% of the performance-based portionperformance shares of the equity award or 12.5% (50% x 25%) of the total annual equity-based grant will be based on Group 1’s return on invested capital (“ROIC”), and 50% of the performance-based portion of the equity award or 12.5% of the total grant willto be based on the Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”)TSR relative to a group of five domestic automotive retailers. The performance period is two fiscal years (2019 and 2020) but the vesting period for the performance shares is three years. The Committee will certify performance at the February 2021 meeting following the endother fifty percent of the two-year performance period, and anylong term incentive, restricted stock awards, that became eligible to vest as a result of performance will remain subject to a time-basedremains time vesting requirement for one additional year. Full vesting of any performance shares earned will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date (February 2022).

over five years.

401(K) PLAN

Plan

We maintain the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (the “401(k) Savings Plan”) to assist alleligible employees in providing for their retirement. Matching contributions may be in the form of cash or shares of our common stock or a combination of both, as determined by the CHR Committee. All of our matches have been in cash for all employees. Amounts that we contributed to each named executive officer’s 401(k) Savings Plan account are disclosed within the Summary Compensation Table.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Generally, under the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, all employees, including our named executive officers, are offered the opportunity to purchase up to $25,000 annually of our common stock at a 15% discount to market, provided that the maximum number of shares that may be purchased by an employee shall not exceed 3,000 shares of common stock per quarter. This is an additional equity incentive we offer to all of our employees to further promote their interest in enhancing stockholdershareholder value. These shares may not be sold by the employee for a minimum of six months following purchase.

 

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  44


Proxy Statement 2022  |  45

Deferred Compensation Plan

The Group 1 Automotive, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) is designed as a retention tool for our corporate and regional officers, dealership general managers, and other key employees and non-employee directors.employees. It allows participants the opportunity to accumulate additional savings for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. Participants can choose from various defined investment options in whichIn 2021, the deferred compensation is notionally invested. Pursuant toCHR Committee approved an amendment and restatement of the Deferred Compensation Plan certain corporate officers, includingwhich eliminated all investment options except the declared rate option and a money-market fund, discontinued the ability of participants to elect and schedule in-service withdrawals, eliminated non-discretionary employer matching contributions and discontinued future participation by our named executive officers, may defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their incentive compensation, and we may make contributions to the participants’ accounts.non-employee directors. For a more detailed discussion of the Deferred Compensation Plan, please see the section entitled “Executive Compensation — Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”

OTHER BENEFITS

Other Benefits

Health and Welfare Benefits

Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in our standard medical, dental, vision, disability insurance and life insurance plans to meet their health and welfare needs. These benefits are provided so as to assure that we are able to maintain a competitive position in terms of attracting and retaining executive officers and other employees. This is a fixed component of compensation and the benefits are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to all of our full-time employees.

Vehicle Allowance

Under his employment agreement, our Chief Executive Officer is provided with two vehicles for his use. Our President, U.S. and Brazilian Operations also receives the use of two vehicles. Our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, our Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Training, and Operations Support and Employee Communications, and our Senior Vice President, Manufacturer Relations, Financial Services and Public Affairs, as well as our other Senior Vice Presidents, receive a vehicle allowance of $15,000 per year and the use of one vehicle. Vice Presidents are provided with a vehicle allowance of $11,300 per year, or a vehicle, and in certain limited cases, both.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  47

Other Limited Perquisites and Personal Benefits

We provide certain named executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that the CHR Committee believes are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation programs and philosophy. These benefits are provided in order to enable us to attract and retain these executives. For example, we pay for club membership privileges that are used primarily for business but also for occasional personal purposes by our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Hesterberg. In addition, we own a fractional interest in an aircraft which is primarily used for business purposes. However, we make a portion of our time available to Mr.Messrs. Hesterberg and Kenningham for personal use during the year. In 2018,2021, Mr. Hesterberg was allowed a maximum of 40 flight hours for personal use;use of the aircraft; however, his actual personal usage was 29.113.8 hours. In 2021, the CHR Committee approved 20 hours for personal use of the aircraft during the year for Mr. Kenningham. In 2021, Mr. Kenningham’s personal usage was 16.2 hours of personal flight time. Messrs. Hesterberg reimburses usand Kenningham reimburse the Company for his personal use based on the published standard industry fare level valuation method. We provide thisThis benefit is provided to Mr.Messrs. Hesterberg because it optimizesand Kenningham to optimize the use of histheir time and is consistent with similar benefits provided by our Peer Companies.

Employment Agreements, Severance Benefits and Change in Control Provisions

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS, SEVERANCE BENEFITS AND CHANGE IN CONTROL PROVISIONS

We maintain employment and other compensatory agreements with certain named executive officers to ensure they will perform their roles for an extended period of time. Certain provisions contained in these agreements, such as non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, as well as change in control severance payments, are essential to retaining our talent and protecting our stockholders.shareholders. We believe that it is appropriate to compensate individuals to refrain from working with competitors following termination, and that compensation enhances the enforceability of such agreements. These agreements and our severance terminology are described in more detail elsewhere in this proxy statement.

 

LOGO


LOGO

Please read “Executive Compensation — Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table — Employment, Incentive Compensation and Non-Compete Agreements.” These agreements provide for severance compensation to be paid if the officer’s employment is terminated under certain conditions, such as following a corporate change, involuntary termination, termination by us for “cause,” death or disability, each as defined in the applicable executive’s agreement. The employment and other compensatory agreements between our Company and our named executive officers and the related severance provisions are designed to meet the following objectives:

CORPORATE CHANGE

Corporate Change

In certain limited scenarios, the potential for merger or being acquired may be in the best interests of our stockholders.shareholders. As a result, we provide severance compensation to certain named executive officers if the officer’s employment is terminated following a corporate change transaction. Our intent is to promote the ability of the officer to act in the best interests of our stockholdersshareholders even though his or her employment could be terminated as a result of the transaction. However, as previously discussed, we do not provide any excise tax gross-ups to any of our named executive officers.

TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE

Termination Without Cause

If we terminate the employment of certain named executive officers “without cause” as defined in the applicable agreement, we are obligated to pay the officer certain compensation and other benefits as described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation - Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.” We believe these payments are appropriate because the terminated officer is bound by confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-compete provisions ranging from one to two years after termination. Both partiesParties with existing agreements have mutually agreed to a severance package that would be in place prior to any termination event. This provides us with more flexibility to make a change in senior management if such a change is in the best interests of our Company and its stockholders.shareholders.

Hedging and Pledging Prohibitions

HEDGING AND PLEDGING PROHIBITIONS

Our Directorsdirectors and named executive officers, in addition to any of our employees or their designees, are prohibited from engaging in “short sales” of our stock or otherwise hedging the risk of ownership of our stock. Hedging is generally defined as purchasing a financial instrument that does, or is intended to, hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of our stock, regardless of the manner in which those individuals hold that stock (i.e., as an award from our LTIP, a gift, or from a direct purchase of the stock in the open market). We have also adopted a policy that prohibits our directors and officers from pledging their Company stock or engaging in any other transaction of a similar nature that has the effect of using Group 1 securities as collateral.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  48

Policy on Payment or Recoupment of Performance-Based Cash Bonuses and Performance-Based Stock Bonuses in the Event of Certain Restatements

POLICY ON PAYMENT OR RECOUPMENT OF PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS

The CHR Committee has adopted a policy on payment or recoupment (or “clawback”) of performance-based cash bonuses and performance-based stock bonuses in the event of certain financial restatements, excluding those required by a change in generally accepted accounting principles, which provides that we will require the payment or reimbursement (to the extent permitted by governing law) of all or a portion of any performance-based cash or performance-based stock bonus where: (a) the payment was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a material restatement and (b) a higher or lower payment would have been made to the employee based upon the restated financial results. In each of these instances, we will, to the extent practicable: (a) either make a payment of, or seek to recover, the cash amount by which the individual employee’s annual performance-based bonus was recalculated based on the restated financial results; provided that we will not pay or seek to recover bonuses paid more than three years prior to the date the applicable restatement is disclosed; (b) cause the award or cancellation of any performance-based stock awards; and (c) seek reimbursement of any unearned gains realized on the vesting of performance-based stock attributable to such awards.

 

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  46


Proxy Statement 2022  |  47

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

Our Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our Board has adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines that apply to our named executive officers, as well as other officers within our Company. The guidelines require our named executive officers to maintain a minimum number of shares of our common stock (CEO – 6x base salary; other named executive officers – 3x base salary) while they are employed by us. The guidelines reinforce the importance of aligning the longer-term interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholdersshareholders and are expressed in terms of the dollar value of their equity holdings as a multiple of each named executive officer’s base salary.

The dollar value of stock ownership is based on base salary times a multiple divided by the previous 36-month average stock price as calculated on December 31stof each year. Unvested restricted stock awards or restricted stock units are counted towards each named executive officer’s ownership requirement. Unvested performance shares are not considered in this calculation. Stock ownership levels should be achieved by each officer within five years of the adoption of these guidelines, or within five years of the individual’s appointment as an officer. Each of our named executive officers was in compliance with current guidelines on December 31, 2018,2021, as indicated below:below.

 

LOGO

 

1

Includes 2,282.53 shares held by the Hesterberg Management Trust, for which Mr. Hesterberg and his spouse are co-trustees, 65,517.61 shares of common stock held in gift trusts for the benefit of Mr. Hesterberg’s children, for which he serves as Trustee, 4,953 shares held by Mr. Hesterberg’s spouse, and 65,517.86 shares held by the 2019 PROXY STATEMENT  

49Family Trust for which Mr.  Hesterberg’s spouse serves as Trustee.

Tax Deductions for Compensation

TAX DEDUCTIONS FOR COMPENSATION

In conducting our executive compensation programs, prior to 2018 the CHR Committee considered the effects of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), which denied publicly held companies a tax deduction for annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to certain covered employees unless theiremployees. While the CHR Committee considers the deductibility of compensation was based on performance criteria. Section 162(m) of the Code was modified in connection with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and beginning with the 2018 calendar year there is no longer an exception for performance-based compensation arrangements that are not deemedpaid to be grandfathered pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, therefore Section 162(m) of the Code did not have an impact on the compensation decisions that the Committee made in 2018. The Committee retains the ability to evaluate the performance of our named executive officers as one factor in its determinations, the CHR Committee will ultimately structure compensation in a manner that meets our business, retention and to pay appropriate compensation,incentive goals, even if some of it may be non-deductible, to ensure competitive levels of total compensation is paid to certain individuals.non-deductible.

LOGO


LOGO

 

Risk Assessment

RISK ASSESSMENT

We have reviewedannually review our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including our named executive officers, and have determined that our compensation programs are not reasonably likely to cause behaviors that would have a material adverse effect on our Company. Moreover, we believe that several design features of our compensation programs and policies reduce the likelihood of excessive risk-taking:

 

 

The program design provides a balanced mix of cash and equity, annual and longer-term incentives, and performance metrics.

 

Annual and long-term incentive payouts are capped at industry standard levels.

We currently do not grant stock options.

The CompensationCHR Committee has discretion over incentive program payouts.to modify the reward if the payout isn’t commensurate with performance.

The compensation recovery policy (which extends to all employees participating in the incentive plan) allows our Company to “claw back” payments made using materially inaccurate financial results.

Our named executive officers are subject to robust stock ownership guidelines.

Compliance and ethical behaviors are integral factors considered in all performance assessments.

We set the proper ethical and moral expectations through our policies, values and procedures and provide various mechanisms for reporting issues.

We maintain an evaluation program, including periodic reviews and audits of our dealership sales, parts and service and finance departments, which enables us to verify that our compensation policies and practices are aligned with expectations.

A cap is placed on the number of shares of common stock that may be awarded to an individual in any calendar year.

We believe that, for all employees, our compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk and instead encourage behaviors that support sustainable value creation.creation aligned with our shareholders’ interests.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  5048


Back to Contents

LOGO

Proxy Statement 2022  |  49

Report of the Compensation & Human

Resources Committee

 

During the last fiscal year, and this year in preparation for the filing of this proxy statement with the SEC, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee:

 

reviewed and discussed the disclosure set forth under the heading “2018 Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management; and
based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, recommended to the Board of Directors that the disclosure set forth under the heading “2018 Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into Group 1 Automotive, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

reviewed and discussed the disclosure set forth under the heading “2021 Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management; and

 

based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, recommended to the Board of Directors that the disclosure set forth under the heading “2021 Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into Group 1 Automotive, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

Respectfully submitted by the Compensation & Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors,

Anne Taylor (Chair)

Max P. Watson, Jr. (Chairman)

John L. AdamsSteven C. Mizell

Stephen D. Quinn

Anne TaylorSteven P. Stanbrook

MaryAnn Wright

LOGO

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  51


Back to Contents

LOGO

Executive Compensation

 

2018 Summary Compensation Table

2021 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table summarizes, with respect to our named executive officers, information relating to the compensation granted or earned for services rendered in all capacities during 2018.2021, 2020 and 2019. Our named executive officers consist of five senior corporate officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer.

 

Name and
Principal Position
 Year Salary
($)
 Stock
Awards(1)
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(2)
($)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(3)
($)
 All Other
Compensation(4)
($)
 Total
($)
Earl J. Hesterberg
President and Chief Executive Officer
 2018 1,150,000 3,599,959 1,437,500 337,607 378,588 6,903,654
 2017 1,100,000 1,999,966 485,833 322,320 203,550 4,111,669
 2016 1,100,000 1,813,700 1,210,000 237,057 213,565 4,574,322
Daryl A. Kenningham
President, U.S. Operations
 2018 624,000 987,935 780,000 181,560 26,745 2,600,240
 2017 533,333 962,312 645,296 169,653 31,310 2,341,904
John C. Rickel
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 2018 599,700 873,943 689,655 395,460 26,210 2,584,968
 2017 583,500 845,799 389,000 379,516 25,338 2,223,153
 2016 583,500 747,763 671,025 282,877 26,740 2,311,905
Frank Grese, Jr.
Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Training and Operations Support
 2018 572,500 683,955 658,375 193,206 31,914 2,139,950
 2017 540,000 589,235 346,500 170,839 33,171 1,679,745
 2016 540,000 414,560 621,000 129,632 32,511 1,737,703
Peter C. DeLongchamps
Senior Vice President, Manufacturer Relations, Financial Services and Public Affairs
 2018 478,300 645,958 550,045 82,345 24,952 1,781,600
 2017 456,300 651,610 182,520 82,239 22,418 1,395,087
 2016 456,300 518,200 342,225 66,367 18,759 1,401,851
        

Name and Principal Position

  Year   

Salary

($)

   Stock
Awards2
($)
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation3
($)
   

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings4

($)

   All Other
Compensation5
($)
   

Total

($)

 

Earl J. Hesterberg

President and Chief Executive Officer

   2021    1,240,000    3,799,959    2,480,000    849,078    208,220    8,577,257 
   2020    900,000    3,646,040    2,400,000    292,530    60,009    7,298,579 
   2019    1,150,000    3,600,029    2,127,500    361,583    685,290    7,924,402 

Daryl A. Kenningham

President, U.S. and Brazilian Operations

   2021    760,000    1,999,994    1,121,000    342,173    174,355    4,397,522 
   2020    604,500    1,772,418    1,080,000    806,776    171,939    4,435,633 
   2019    655,200    1,121,992    982,800    164,068    177,153    3,101,213 

 

Daniel McHenry

Senior Vice President And Chief Financial Officer

   2021    575,000    499,925    661,250    859    34,557    1,771,591 
   2020    375,317    450,026    349,506        13,607    1,188,456 

Frank Grese, Jr.1

Senior Vice President, Human Resources,

Training and Operations Support

   2021    633,450    699,807    715,799    373,425    32,605    2,455,086 
   2020    558,625    708,927    707,250    157,112    34,764    2,166,678 
   2019    595,400    683,993    684,710    197,769    33,618    2,195,490 

Peter C. DeLongchamps

Senior Vice President, Manufacturer

Relations, Financial Services and Public Affairs

   2021    530,450    799,821    610,018    142,794    29,663    2,112,746 
   2020    467,792    708,927    592,250    54,561    30,613    1,854,143 
   2019    492,650    647,980    566,548    77,961    24,489    1,809,628 
1

Effective January 1, 2022, Mr. Grese was no longer responsible for Human Resources.

 

(1)2

The amounts in the “Stock Awards” column reflectreflects the required accounting expense for thesethe restricted stock and performance share awards and do not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by our named executive officers. These amounts represent the grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 in connection with restricted stock awards granted under the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan and the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan.LTIP. Assumptions made in the calculation of these amounts in fiscal years 2016, 20172019 and 20182020 are included in Note 4 to the audited financial statements included in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Assumptions made in the calculation of these amounts in fiscal year 2021 are included in Note 5 to the audited financial statements included in our Annual ReportsReport on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018, respectively.2021. Certain of these awards have no intrinsic value to the recipient until the performance or vesting schedule is met. For example: Asas of December 31, 2018,2021, our named executive officers had not realized any value from their 20182021 restricted stock awards because vesting will not begin until 2020,2023, when forfeiture restrictions will lapse as to 40% of the awards. Forfeiture restrictions will lapse as to the remaining 60% of the 20182021 awards in 20% increments in 2024, 2025 and 2026. Regarding performance share awards granted in 2021, assuming performance is satisfied, they are scheduled to vest on December 31, 2022 and vested shares will be released on December 31, 2023. With respect to the one-half portion of the performance share awards that are based on “performance conditions” for accounting purposes (as opposed to market conditions), if we assumed that the probable accounting value was based on the maximum payout for the awards, the grant date values would have been as follows: Mr. Hesterberg, $949,990; Mr. Kenningham, $499,925; Mr. McHenry, $124,871, Mr. Grese, $174,878; and Mr. DeLongchamps, $199,882. Vesting schedules for equity awards can be found in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2018”2021” table.

(2)3

Annual cash incentive awards based upon the achievement of financial and mission-based goals. This is discussed further under “2018“2021 Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Annual Incentive Compensation Plan”.

(3)4

Amounts reflect above-market earnings on the Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts are reflective ofPlan, as defined by earnings in excess of 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate, with compounding, of 3.12%1.56%. We do not offer a pension plan.

(4)LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  50


Proxy Statement 2022  |  51

5

The following table contains a breakdown of the compensation and benefits included under “All Other Compensation” for 2018:2021:

 

        

Name

  Year  401(k) Savings
Plan Matching
Contribution
($)
  Automobile
Allowance
($)
  Use of
Demonstrator
Vehiclea
($)
  Airplane
Useb
($)
 Club
Membership
and Dues
($)
  Total
($)

Earl J. Hesterberg

  2021  8,700    29,431  150,404 19,685  208,220

Daryl A. Kenningham

  2021  8,700    23,475  142,180   174,355

Daniel McHenry

  2021  8,700  15,000  10,857     34,557

Frank Grese, Jr.

  2021  7,111  15,000  10,494     32,605

Peter C. DeLongchamps

  2021  8,700  15,000  5,963     29,663
2019 PROXY STATEMENT  a 52
Name Year 401(k)
Savings Plan
Matching
Contribution
($)
 Automobile
Allowance
($)
 Use of
Demonstrator
Vehicle(a)
($)
 Airplane
Use(b)
($)
 Club
Membership
and Dues
($)
 Total
($)
Earl J. Hesterberg 2018 7,950   27,538  330,759  12,341  378,588
Daryl A. Kenningham 2018 7,950   18,795      26,745
John C. Rickel 2018 7,950 15,000  3,260      26,210
Frank Grese, Jr. 2018 5,913 15,000  11,001      31,914
Peter C. DeLongchamps 2018 7,950 15,000  2,002      24,952

(a)Represents the incremental cost for personal use of one or more Company demonstrator vehicles. The incremental cost is determined by multiplying the annual lease value of the vehicle by the percentage of personal use, which we track through travel logs.

b (b)

While we do not have formal arrangements regarding airplane use with our named executive officers other than Mr.Messrs. Hesterberg and Kenningham, in the event that the executives or their family members make use of the airplane they will reimburse usthe Company for their personal costs. Amounts within this column represents the incremental cost to us of providing this benefit, which is generally the difference between the amount paid by the executive for the use of our leased airplane under the standard industry fare level (“SIFL”) method and the lease cost to usthe Company for such use.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2021

The following table provides information concerning each grant of an award made to our named executive officers under our annual incentive compensation plan and 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan during 2018:2021:

 

    Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
 All Other Stock
Awards: Number
of Shares of Stock
 Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock
and Option
Name Grant Date Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 or Units
(#)
 Awards
($)
Earl J. Hesterberg   958,333 1,437,500    
  02/20/2018    47,371  3,599,959 
Daryl A. Kenningham   520,000 780,000    
  02/20/2018    13,000  987,935 
John C. Rickel   499,750 689,655    
  02/20/2018    11,500  873,943 
Frank Grese, Jr.   477,083 658,375    
  02/20/2018    9,000  683,955 
Peter C. DeLongchamps   378,583 550,045    
  02/20/2018    8,500  645,958 

       
       

 

Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards1

      

 

Possible Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards2

   All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock or
Units
(#)
   Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)
 

Name

  Grant Date   Threshold
($)
   Target
($)
   Maximum
($)
       Threshold
(#)
   Target
(#)
   Maximum
(#)
 

Earl J. Hesterberg

       930,000    1,240,000    2,480,000                         
   02/19/2021                                19,377    2,849,969 
   02/19/2021                    3,230    6,459    12,918        949,990 

Daryl A. Kenningham

       570,000    760,000    1,140,000                         
   02/19/2021                                10,199    1,500,069 
   02/19/2021                    1,700    3,399    6,798        499,925 

Daniel McHenry

       383,525    478,975    661,250                         
   02/19/2021                                2,550    375,054 
   02/19/2021                    425    849    1,698        124,871 

Frank Grese, Jr.

       422,511    527,664    728,468                         
   02/19/2021                                3,569    524,929 
   02/19/2021                    595    1,189    2,378        174,878 

Peter C. DeLongchamps

       353,810    441,865    610,018                         
   02/19/2021                                4,079    599,939 
   02/19/2021                    680    1,359    2,718        199,882 
(1)1

Estimated possible payouts under the 20182021 annual incentive compensation plan. The “Threshold” column shows dashes because the ultimate value of the annual incentive compensation payouts could be reduced to effectively zero. The amounts shown in the “Threshold”, “Target” and “Maximum” columns assume achievement of 100% of the mission-based goals for each named executive officer. See the “Non-Equity“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the 20182021 Summary Compensation Table for actual amounts paid to named executive officers under the annual incentive compensation plan for 20182021 and “2018“2021 Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Annual Incentive Compensation Plan” beginning on page 4438 of this proxy statement for a description of the annual incentive compensation plan and how the payouts were determined.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  2 

These columns reflect the threshold, target and maximum numbers of performance share units granted in 2021. The “Threshold” column reflects 50% of the target award; the “Target” column reflects 100% of the target award; and the “Maximum” column reflects 200% of the target number of the award, as this is the number of shares that could be earned based solely on the performance levels achieved. However, the awards were designed with a Maximum Value, a supplemental maximum payout formula that is described further within the CD&A above. This Maximum Value could potentially alter the number of shares of underlying common stock that could become payable pursuant to the award under any of the performance levels.

  53

LOGO


Back to Contents

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards TableLOGO

 

NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE TO SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE AND GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

The following is a discussion of material factors we believe are necessary to an understanding of the information disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for 2018.2021.

EMPLOYMENT, INCENTIVE COMPENSATION AND NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS

Employment, Incentive Compensation and Non-Compete Agreements

Earl J. Hesterberg

Effective May 19, 2015, we entered into anOur employment agreement with Mr. Hesterberg. Mr. Hesterberg’s annual base salary under the employment agreement is $1,100,000 (retroactive to January 1, 2015), subject to increase by the Compensation Committee from time to time. Effective January 1, 2018, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Hesterberg’s base salary to $1,150,000.

On May 17, 2018, we entered into an amendment to employment agreement with Mr. Hesterberg. Under the terms of the employment agreement, as amended, the employment agreement was extended for a one-year term, and continuing through May 19, 2019, unless earlier terminated as provided therein. Following May 19, 2019, the agreement will continuecontinues in effect until terminated by either Group 1 or Mr. Hesterberg upon delivery of six-months advanced written notice of termination no later than six months prior to the date of termination set forth in such notice. Provisions of Mr. Hesterberg’s employment agreement, as amended, related to termination and change in control are discussed in “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page 57 of this proxy statement.termination.

John C. Rickel

Daryl A. Kenningham

Effective January 1, 2009,June 6, 2011, we entered into an employmentincentive compensation, confidentiality, non-disclosure and non-compete agreement with Mr. Rickel. SubjectKenningham (the “Incentive Agreement”). The Incentive Agreement initially granted Mr. Kenningham 7,000 shares of restricted stock (which vested in full in 2016) in exchange for his agreement to certain non-competition restrictions and other customary restrictive covenants such as a confidentiality provision. The non-competition restriction within the Incentive Agreement is in effect during Mr. Kenningham’s employment and will continue in effect for a period of two years following his termination of employment for any reason.

Daniel McHenry

On June 1, 2020, we entered into an offer letter with Mr. McHenry (the “Offer Letter”), effective as of his appointment date. The Offer Letter provides that Mr. McHenry will receive an annual salary of $575,000 and will be eligible for an annual bonus opportunity equal to a maximum of 115% of his base salary. In connection with his promotion, and as an inducement to move to the termsU.S., on August 20, 2020, we entered into a “Retention, Confidentiality and conditionsNon-Compete Agreement with Mr. McHenry (the “Retention Agreement”). Pursuant to the Retention Agreement, Mr. McHenry was granted an initial restricted stock award of 2,067 shares, which was determined by dividing $200,000 by the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. This initial restricted stock award will vest 40% on the second anniversary of the agreement, we agreeddate of grant, with an additional 20% vesting on each subsequent annual anniversary date thereafter. The Retention Agreement provides that Mr. McHenry will also be eligible to employ Mr. Rickel through December 31, 2010. Mr. Rickel’s employment agreement automatically renewsreceive future annual restricted stock awards, which will be based on his performance and subject to approval by the CHR Committee and which are expected to be granted at the same time and with similar vesting provisions as applicable for successive one-year periods unless either party prior to the expiration of the term provides 60 days prior written notice of termination to theour other party. Provisions of Mr. Rickel’s employment agreement related to termination and change in control are discussed in “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page 57 of this proxy statement.

executive officers.

Additional Information

Messrs. Hesterberg, Kenningham, Rickel, Grese and DeLongchamps are also entitled to participate, on the same basis generally as our other employees, in all general employee benefit plans and programs that are made available to all or substantially all of our employees. In addition, Messrs. Hesterberg and Kenningham are entitled to the use of two demonstrator vehicles of their choice, and Messrs. Rickel, Grese and DeLongchamps are each entitled to one demonstrator vehicle of their choice and a vehicle allowance totaling $1,250 per month.

All incentive compensation awards payable to Messrs. Hesterberg and Rickel will be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion in accordance with the terms of our annual incentive compensation program, and all payments pursuant to this program shall be made on or before March 15thof the year following the year of service to which the incentive compensation relates.

We have not entered into an employment or non-compete agreement with Mr. Kenningham, Mr. Grese or Mr. DeLongchamps. However, in the event of a “qualified retirement”, which is a retirement after a minimum of ten years of service with our Company and the executive attaining the age of 63, upon satisfaction of a two year non-compete and certain non-disclosure covenants, all unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units (granted in prior years) held by the named executive officer as of his retirement date will vest. Provided, however, that beginning with theequity-based compensation awards granted in 2018, any restricted stock awarded to the executive must have been granted (1) at least six months prior to the date the executive provides notification of his intent to terminate his employment due to qualified retirement, and (2) at least six months prior to his effective retirement date, to be eligible for vesting as provided above. Messrs. Hesterberg and Grese are currently the onlyour named executive officers eligible for a “qualified retirement”.could receive accelerated vesting in connection with certain qualifying terminations or change in control events.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  5452


Back to Contents

Proxy Statement 2022  |  53

Outstanding Equity Awards at DecemberOUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2018

2021

The following table provides information concerning restricted stock awards and performance share awards for our named executive officers. As of December 31, 2018,2021 none of our named executive officers held any stock options.

 

  Stock Awards
Name Grant Date(1) Number of Shares or
Units of Stock That
Have Not Vested
(#)
 Market Value of Shares
or Units of Stock That
Have Not Vested(2)
($)
Earl J. Hesterberg 02/25/2014 9,000  474,480 
  02/24/2015 14,000  738,080 
  02/17/2016 21,000  1,107,120 
  03/01/2017 25,440  1,341,197 
  02/20/2018 47,371  2,497,399 
Daryl A. Kenningham 02/25/2014 1,000  52,720 
  02/24/2015 3,200  168,704 
  02/17/2016 4,800  253,056 
  02/28/2017 12,265  646,611 
  02/20/2018 13,000  685,360 
John C. Rickel 02/25/2014 3,100  163,432 
  02/24/2015 5,772  304,300 
  02/17/2016 8,658  456,450 
  02/28/2017 10,780  568,322 
  02/20/2018 11,500  606,280 
Frank Grese, Jr. 02/25/2014 1,600  84,352 
  02/24/2015 3,200  168,704 
  02/17/2016 4,800  253,056 
  02/28/2017 7,510  395,927 
  02/20/2018 9,000  474,480 
Peter C. DeLongchamps 02/25/2014 2,200  115,984 
  02/24/2015 3,848  202,867 
  02/17/2016 6,000  316,320 
  02/28/2017 8,305  437,840 
  02/20/2018 8,500  448,120 

   
   Restricted Stock Awards1   Performance Share Awards2 

Name

  Grant Date   

Number of Shares
or Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested

(#)

   Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested3
($)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares
or Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested
(#)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market Value
of Unearned
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested3
($)
 

Earl J. Hesterberg

   03/01/2017    5,088    993,279         
   02/20/2018    18,949    3,699,224         
   02/19/2019    26,316    5,137,410         
   02/17/2020    40,532    7,912,657         
   02/19/2021    19,377    3,782,778    6,459    1,260,926 

Daryl A. Kenningham

   02/28/2017    2,453    478,875         
   02/20/2018    5,200    1,015,144         
   02/19/2019    8,203    1,601,390         
   02/17/2020    19,703    3,846,420         
   02/19/2021    10,199    1,991,049    3,399    663,553 

Daniel McHenry

   02/28/2017    700    136,654         
   02/20/2018    1,600    312,352         
   02/19/2019    2,400    468,528         
   02/17/2020    2,544    496,640         
   08/20/2020    2,067    403,520         
   02/19/2021    2,550    497,811    849    165,742 

Frank Grese, Jr.

   02/28/2017    1,502    293,220         
   02/20/2018    3,600    702,792         
   02/19/2019    5,000    976,100         
   02/17/2020    7,880    1,538,334         
   02/19/2021    3,569    696,740    1,189    232,117 

Peter C. DeLongchamps

   02/28/2017    1,661    324,260         
   02/20/2018    3,400    663,748         
   02/19/2019    4,738    924,952         
   02/17/2020    7,880    1,538,334         
   02/19/2021    4,079    796,302    1,359    265,304 
(1)1

Forfeiture restrictions on our restricted stock awards lapse over a five-year period: 40% of the award on the second anniversary of the grant date, and 20% on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date, respectively. Unvested shares granted on February 17, 2020 include performance shares which satisfied the performance vesting requirement as of December 31, 2020 but remain subject to time-based vesting which will lapse on December 31, 2022.

(2)2

Performance shares are earned with respect to measures over a designated performance period, as described in more detail within the CD&A section above. Regarding the February 19, 2021 award, the performance period begins on January 1, 2021 and ends on December 31, 2022. The vesting date is December 31, 2023. Values here are reported at Target payout amounts.

3

Calculated using value of our common stock at close of market on December 31, 20182021 (the last trading day of the 20182021 year) of $52.72.$195.22.

 

2018 Restricted Stock VestedLOGO


LOGO

 

2021 STOCK VESTED

The following table provides information relating to the vesting of restricted stock during 20182021 on an aggregated basis for each of our named executive officers. Our named executive officers currently do not havehold stock options.

 

  Stock Awards
Name Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting(1)
(#)
 Value Realized
on Vesting(2)
($)
Earl J. Hesterberg 39,000  2,938,970 
Daryl A. Kenningham 7,600  573,302 
John C. Rickel 14,758  1,113,049 
Frank Grese, Jr. 8,200  618,338 
Peter C. DeLongchamps 10,324  778,513 

   
   Performance Shares   Restricted Stock Awards 

Name

  

Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting1

(#)

   

Value Realized
on Vesting2

($)

   

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting1

(#)

   

Value Realize on
Vesting2

($)

 

Earl J. Hesterberg

   26,440    5,121,957    39,106    5,811,914 

Daryl A. Kenningham

   8,239    1,596,059    12,120    1,799,709 

Daniel McHenry

           3,700    580,102 

Frank Grese, Jr.

   5,024    973,249    8,235    1,222,636 

Peter C. DeLongchamps

   4,758    921,720    8,518    1,265,827 
(1)1

Represents the gross number of shares acquired upon vesting of restricted stock and performance shares, without taking into account any shares withheld to satisfy applicable tax obligations.

(2)2

Represents the value of the vested restricted stock and performance shares, calculated by multiplying (a) the number of vested shares of restricted stock by (b) the average of the high and low sales prices of our common stock on the vesting date, which is how we calculate market value for purposes of this table.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  55

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth our named executive officers’ information regarding the Deferred Compensation Plan, including, with respect to each officer: (1) the aggregate contributions made by the officer, (2) the employer contribution, (3) the aggregate interest or other earnings accrued, and (4)(3) the total balance of the officer’s account.

 

Name Executive
Contributions
in Last FY(1)
($)
 Employer Match
Contributions in
Last FY(2)
($)
 Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY(3)
($)
 Aggregate
Balance
at Last FYE(4)
($)
Earl J. Hesterberg 1,150,000  210  549,120  7,223,963 
Daryl A. Kenningham     296,192  3,881,688 
John C. Rickel   210  645,528  8,464,076 
Frank Grese, Jr. 615,438    314,178  4,263,458 
Peter C. DeLongchamps 69,354    135,316  1,772,610 

    

Name

  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY1
($)
   Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
FY2
($)
   Aggregate
Balance
at Last
FYE3
($)
 

Earl J. Hesterberg

       1,043,265    13,809,565 

Daryl A. Kenningham

       425,470    5,552,241 

Daniel McHenry

   127,938    1,073    129,011 

Frank Grese, Jr.

       462,891    6,061,279 

Peter C. DeLongchamps

   34,214    177,413    2,324,689 
(1)1

Reported as compensation to the named executive officer in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018,2021 (including any non-equity incentive plan compensation earned during 2018,2021 but paid in 2019)2022).

(2)2Represents portion of Company 401(k) savings plan matching contributions that could not be contributed into the 401(k) savings plan for the individuals due to Code restrictions. The 401(k) Savings Plan matching contributions are reported as “All Other Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018.
(3)

The following portions of the aggregate earnings in the last fiscal year were reported in the 20182021 “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column of the 20182021 Summary Compensation Table because they were above-market earnings: Mr. Hesterberg ($337,607)849,078), Mr. Kenningham ($181,560)342,173), Mr. RickelMcHenry ($395,466)859), Mr. Grese ($193,206)373,425), and Mr. DeLongchamps ($82,345)142,794).

(4)LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  54


Proxy Statement 2022  |  55

3

The following portions of the aggregate balance amounts for each of the following named executive officers were reported as compensation to the officer in the Summary Compensation Table in previous years:

 

  Earl J.
Hesterberg
($)
 Daryl A.
Kenningham
($)
 John C.
Rickel
($)
 Frank
Grese, Jr.
($)
 Peter C.
DeLongchamps
($)
2017  340,083   451,707   466,814   443,250   13,689 
2016  847,000      904,425   321,300   82,134 
2015  924,000      636,015      82,134 
2014  375,000      560,835      86,450 
2013  66,667      385,000      44,400 
2012  125,000      215,938      62,550 
2011  100,000      462,000      25,120 
2010        465,750       
2009  500,000      561,630       
2008  37,159      11,300       
2007  39,509      7,852       
2006  25,465      1,235       
2005  12,019             

      
    Earl J.
Hesterberg
($)
   Daryl A.
Kenningham
($)
   Daniel
McHenry
($)
   Frank
Grese, Jr.
($)
   Peter C.
DeLongchamps
($)
 

2020

   1,972,530    806,776        473,581    86,363 

2019

   1,850,833    164,068        197,769    92,740 

2018

   1,487,607    181,560        808,644    151,699 

2017

   622,403    621,360        614,089    95,928 

2016

   1,084,057            450,932    148,501 

2015

   1,094,001                137,899 

2014

   494,519                127,009 

2013

   202,527                89,271 

2012

   233,611                97,419 

2011

   178,285                 

2010

                    

2009

   500,000                 

2008

   147,159                 

2007

   179,235                 

2006

   525,465                 

2005

   205,240                 

Pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan, certain corporate officers, including named executive officers, may defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their incentive compensation. Deferral elections are to be made no later than the last day of the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year in which such compensation is earned. Atearned, or the plan administrative committee’s discretion, deferral elections with respect to certain performance-based compensation may be made not later than six months prior to the endfirst day of the performance period in which such compensation is earned. In addition, for eachnext calendar year, we contribute an amount on behalf of each executive equal toquarter where the amount ofemployee becomes eligible during the employer match the executive forfeited under the 401(k) Savings Plan in order for the 401(k) Savings Plan to comply with the nondiscrimination requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.calendar year. Currently, 100% of each named executive officer’s account is vested. We may also make discretionary credits to an officer’s account from time to time, which credits will be subject to a vesting schedule established by us at the time of such credit. We did not make any discretionary contribution credits during the 20172019, 2020 or 2018 year. If no vesting schedule is established, the officer will be vested in a percentage of the discretionary employer deferral equal to the officer’s vested interest in his “employer contribution account” under the 401(k) Savings Plan. If we undergo a corporate change, the officer will become fully vested in his account under the Deferred Compensation Plan.2021 calendar years.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  56

Benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan will be paid no earlier than upon the executive’s termination of service, or, for deferrals made prior to January 1, 2021, upon a certain date elected by the officer. Benefits will be paid, at the participant’s election, in a lump sum or in annual installments, although all distributions will be paid in cash. Payments upon an executive’s termination of service may be delayed for six months to the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Except in the event of unforeseeable financial emergencies, effective January 1, 2021, in-service withdrawals are generally not permitted in the Deferred Compensation Plan, although the necessary portion of a participant’s vested account balance may be distributed in order to satisfy certain employment, federal or state taxes. An unforeseeable financial emergency shall allow a participant to access vested funds in his accounts upon the occurrence of: (1) a severe financial hardship of the participant that results from an illness or accident of the participant, or the participant’s beneficiary, spouse or dependent; (2) loss of the participant’s or the beneficiary’s property due to casualty; or (3) a similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstance as described in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code arising as a result of events beyond the participant’s control.

Effective January 1, 2021, an annual contribution limit of $300,000 was implemented for all employee deferrals with an employee lifetime maximum contribution amount of $3.5 million.

Deferred amounts will be deemed to be notionally invested in such fund as the participants shall designate. Most of the funds are also available in the Group 1 401(k) Savings Plan except foreither the Group 1 Guaranteed Crediting Rate investment option which is the default investment option and only available in the Deferred Compensation Plan.or a money market fund. The Group 1 Guaranteed Crediting Rate investment option is a declared interest rate, which is set by the Committee annually. The deferredannually, and was set by the Committee at 8.0% for 2021.

LOGO


LOGO

Deferred Compensation Plan Changes for Fiscal 2022

In November 2021, the CHR Committee reviewed a market analysis prepared by PM&P. Following extensive discussion between management, the CHR Committee and PM&P, the CHR Committee set the declared interest rate for 2018 was setthe Deferred Compensation Plan at 8.0%.6.5% for 2022. The 2022 rate reflects current interest rate changes and the Company’s cost of capital.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

We believe providing certain senior corporate officers with severance payments and accelerated vesting of equity awards in certain circumstances are important retention tools. In addition, we believe that providing for double-trigger“double-trigger” (defined below) payments and equity award vesting to certain key executives in connection with a change in corporate control“corporate change” helps maximize stockholdershareholder value by encouraging our executives to objectively review any proposed transaction, whether or not that executive will continue to be employed. A “double-trigger” payment or benefit becomes due in the event of a qualifying event such as an involuntary termination of employment without “cause” or a termination of employment with “good reason” in connection with a corporate change. Executive officers at other companies in the general market against which we compete for executive talent commonly have equity compensation plans that provide for accelerated vesting upon a corporate change and post-termination payments, and we have consistently provided this benefit to certain senior corporate officers in order to remain competitive in attracting and retaining skilled professionals.

The discussionDisclosed below disclosesis the amount of compensation and/or other benefits that would be payable to each of our named executive officers in the event of termination of their employment under the following scenarios: death, disability, with and without cause, for certain constructive termination events, andin each case, following a corporate change. AllThese potential payments to the named executive officers upon termination of their employment or upon a corporate change that could have occurred on December 31, 2018 are governed by the 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan and the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan pursuant to which various equity incentive awards were issued and, with respect to Messrs. Hesterberg, Kenningham, and Rickel,McHenry, the terms of employment agreements as described below.or other individual written arrangements. None of our named executive officers is entitled to an excise tax gross-up payment. For additional information regarding the employment agreements, see “2018“2021 Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Employment Agreements, Severance Benefits and Change in Control Provisions.”

Employment And Severance Agreements

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

We maintained employment agreements with Messrs. Hesterberg and Rickel during 2018. EachMr.Hesterberg’s Employment Agreement. Mr. Hesterberg’s agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) provides that in the event the executive is terminated due to an Involuntary Termination or the executive terminates his employment following a Constructive Termination Event, the executive will be entitled to the following:

a lump sum payment equal to the executive’s base salary divided by 12 and multiplied by a severance multiplier. The “severance multiplier” in the case of Mr. Hesterberg, is 12 months or the remaining months in the term of the employment agreement. The payment will be made on the first day of the seventh month following the termination of employment;

 

a lump sum payment equal to the executive’s base salary divided by 12 and multiplied by a severance multiplier. The “severance multiplier” in the case of Mr. Hesterberg or Mr. Rickel, is the greater of 12 months or the remaining months in the term of the employment agreement. The payment will be made on the first day of the seventh month following the termination of employment;

a pro rata bonus calculated in accordance with our Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, paid in a single lump sum payment at the later of (1) the first day of the seventh month following the executive’s separation from service, or (2) March 15thof the year following the release of earnings for the year in which the separation of service occurred;

immediate vesting of all unvested restricted stock awards or stock options, which will be exercisable as if the executive had continued to be employed by us for the full term of his employment agreement; and
the use of a demonstrator vehicle for a period of six months.

 

immediate vesting of all unvested restricted stock awards or stock options, which will be exercisable as if the executive had continued to be employed by the Company for the full term of his employment agreement; and

the use of a demonstrator vehicle for a period of six months.

In the event that the executive terminates employment following an involuntary reduction of his salary or incentive compensation targets within six months after a Corporate Change, the executive will be entitled to the same payments and benefits as described in the first three bullets above, except the severance multiplier will be 30 months. Each agreement further provides that if the executive’s employment is terminated due to Death or Disability, then the executive is entitled to:

 

his pro rata salary through the date of such termination and a pro rata bonus (based on his termination date), calculated in accordance with our Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, paid in a single lump sum payment at

his pro rata salary through the date of such termination and a pro rata bonus (based on his termination date), calculated in accordance with our Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, paid in a single lump sum payment at
LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  56


Proxy Statement 2022  |  57

the later of (1) the first day of the seventh month following the executive’s separation from service, or (2) March 15thof the year following the release of earnings for the year in which the separation of service occurred;

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  57

immediate vesting of all unvested restricted stock awards or stock options, which will be exercisable as if the executive had continued to be employed by us for the full term of his employment agreement; and

immediate vesting of all unvested restricted stock awards or stock options, which will be exercisable as if the executive had continued to be employed by us for the full term of his employment agreement; and
in the case of Disability, the use of a demonstrator vehicle for a period of six months, or in the event of the executive’s Death, for Messrs. Hesterberg and Rickel, the use of the vehicle would go to the surviving spouse, if any, for a period of twelve months.

 

in the case of Disability, the use of a demonstrator vehicle for a period of six months, or in the event of the executive’s Death, the use of the vehicle would go to the surviving spouse, if any, for a period of twelve months.

Mr. Hesterberg’s agreement also provides that if he resigns at any time after May 18, 2018, all unvested equity awards held by Mr. Hesterberg will vest upon satisfaction of certain post-termination employment obligations set forth in his non-compete agreement (discussed below); provided, however, that beginning with the awards granted in 2018, any restricted stock awarded to the executive must have been granted at least six months prior to the date the executive provides notification of his intent to terminate his employment due to qualified retirement, and at least six months prior to his effective retirement date to be eligible for vesting as provided above. In addition, if Mr. Hesterberg’s employment is terminated for any reason, other than cause, after May 18, 2018, he will receive his pro rata bonus through the date of his termination, calculated in accordance with the annual incentive compensation plan and paid in a single lump sum payment.

In the event of a termination by the Company for Cause or a Voluntary Termination by the executive, all compensation and benefits will cease as of the respective date of termination. In these circumstances, the named executive officers would only receive base salary earned but not yet paid.

The employment agreements contain a covenant that the executives will not sue or lodge any claim against usthe Company based upon an Involuntary Termination for any payments in addition to those described above. In the event that the executive breaches this covenant, we will be entitled to recover from that executive all sums we or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates have expended in relation to such action. We will also be entitled to offset any amounts expended in relation to defending such claim against any amounts owed to the executive prior to a final determination of the arbitration provisions provided for in the employment agreement.

The executives haveMr. Hesterberg has agreed not to disclose, during or at any time after their employment with us, any of our confidential information or trade secrets. The executivesexecutive will return all proprietary materials, and all copies thereof, to usthe Company upon a termination of employment for any reason, and all copyrighted works that the executive may have created during his employment relating to usthe Company or our business in any manner shall remain our property.

Mr.Kenningham’s Incentive Compensation, Confidentiality, Non-Disclosure and Non-Compete Agreement. The Incentive Agreement provides for certain potential severance payments and includes customary restrictive covenants. In the event that Mr. Kenningham is terminated by the Company without Cause or incurs an Involuntary Termination (generally defined as a termination by Mr. Kenningham due to the Company breaching any material provision of the Incentive Agreement, a Constructive Termination Event, or an involuntary reduction in his base salary or incentive compensation targets (other than a reduction in such target that is applied consistently to other executive officers to reflect changes in relative EPS projections as a result of such Corporate Change) within six months following a “Corporate Change” that is not cured by the Company within 30 days of written notice from Mr. Kenningham), the Company shall pay to Mr. Kenningham a cash payment equal to one year of base salary at the most recent rate of pay, subject to Mr. Kenningham’s compliance with certain restrictive covenants within the Incentive Agreement and Mr. Kenningham’s execution of a general release in the Company’s favor; in addition, upon such a qualifying termination, Mr. Kenningham shall also be entitled to accelerated vesting of outstanding restricted stock awards, which is conditioned upon his compliance with the terms of such awards, and a pro-rated bonus calculated in accordance with the Company’s annual incentive compensation plan. In the event that Mr. Kenningham incurs a Disability, he shall be paid his regular salary in effect at the start of such Disability up to the first 120-day period of his Disability.

TheseMr.McHenry’s Retention and Severance Agreement. The Retention Agreement provides for certain potential severance payments and includes customary restrictive covenants. In the event that Mr. McHenry incurs a “Qualifying Termination” (generally defined as a termination without Cause or due to Mr. McHenry’s death or Disability), the Company shall pay to Mr. McHenry a cash payment equal to the average annual base salary that

LOGO


LOGO

Mr. McHenry received over the 24-month period immediately preceding the date of the applicable termination, subject to Mr. McHenry’s compliance with certain restrictive covenants within the Retention Agreement and upon Mr. McHenry’s execution of a general release in the Company’s favor.

As used in the above-described agreements generally containfor Messrs. Hesterberg, Kenningham and McHenry, as applicable, the following terms except where noted otherwiseshall generally have the meaning provided below, and the following provisions thatwhich could impact the amount of compensation that the executives receiveexecutive receives at or following theirhis separation from service from us:

 

Cause” shall mean any of the following: (1) conviction or plea of nolo contendere to a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude; (2) breach of any material provision of either an agreement with us or our Code of Conduct; (3) the use, for his own benefit, of any confidential or proprietary information of ours, or willfully divulging for his benefit such information; (4) fraud or misappropriation or theft of any of our funds or property; (5) willful refusal to perform his duties; or (6) gross negligence; provided, however, that we, before terminating the executive under (2) or (5), must first give written notice to him of the nature of the alleged breach or refusal and must provide him with a minimum of fifteen days to correct the problem. Before terminating him for purported gross negligence we must give written notice that explains the alleged gross negligence in detail and must provide him with a minimum of 20 days to correct the problem, unless correction is inherently impossible.
Corporate Change” shall mean the first to occur of any of the following events: (1) any person acquires 50% or more of our common stock or voting securities, other than (a) any acquisition directly from or resulting from an acquisition of our shares by us, (b) any acquisition by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by us or any entity controlled by us, or (c) any acquisition by any entity pursuant to a transaction which complies with clauses (a) or (b); (2) the occurrence of a merger, reorganization, consolidation or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, unless our stockholders prior to such transaction hold more than 50% of the equity and voting power of the resulting entity or entity holding such assets, no person (other than benefit plans of such entity) holds 50% or more of the equity or voting power of such entity and at least a majority of the board of directors of such entity were members of the Incumbent Board; or (3) our stockholders approve our complete liquidation or dissolution.
Constructive Termination Event” shall occur upon: (1) the failure by us to pay the executive’s compensation as provided in the applicable agreement; (2) relocation without his consent of his primary employment location of more than 50 miles; (3) our request that the executive perform any illegal activity or sign-off on any inappropriate financial statement or acknowledgement; (4) a material diminution in the executive’s position, duties, responsibilities, reporting status, or authority; or (5) a material negative reduction in base salary or incentive compensation targets within six months after a Corporate Change, except that before exercising his right to terminate the employment relationship pursuant to any of the previous provisions, he must first give written notice to our Board of the circumstances purportedly giving rise to his right to terminate and must provide us with a minimum of thirty days to correct the problem, unless correction is inherently impossible.
Disability” shall mean the executive’s becoming incapacitated by accident, sickness or other circumstance that in the reasonable opinion of a qualified doctor approved by our Board, renders him mentally or physically incapable of performing the essential functions of the executive’s position, with or without reasonable accommodation, and that will continue, in the reasonable opinion of the doctor, for a period of no less than 180 days.
Involuntary Termination” shall mean a termination by the executive due to a Constructive Termination Event by itself or in relation to a Corporate Change, or by us for any reason without Cause, at the discretion of our Board; an “Involuntary Termination” also includes the nonrenewal of the executive’s employment agreement by the Board.
Voluntary Termination” shall mean a termination by the executive other than for a Constructive Termination Event.

“Cause” shall mean, for purposes of the Employment Agreement and the Retention Agreement, any of the following: (1) conviction or plea of nolo contendere to a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude; (2) breach of any material provision of either an agreement with us or our Code of Conduct or certain other material policies; (3) the use, for his own benefit, of any confidential or proprietary information of ours, or willfully divulging for his benefit such information; (4) fraud or misappropriation or theft of any of our funds or property; (5) willful refusal to perform his duties; or (6) gross negligence; provided, however, that we, before terminating the executive under (2), (5), or (6) must first give written notice to him of the nature of the alleged breach or refusal and must provide him with a period of time (15-20 days) to correct the problem, unless correction is inherently impossible.

“Cause” shall mean, for purposes of the Incentive Agreement, any of the following: (1) indictment or conviction of any felony or any crime involving dishonesty, (2) participation in any fraud or act of dishonesty against the Company, (3) a violation of any Company policy that causes a material detriment to the Company, (4) a breach of the executive’s duties to the Company, including but not limited to unsatisfactory performance of job duties that is not corrected within 30 days after written notice, (5) intentional damage to any property of the Company, (6) conduct by the executive that demonstrates gross unfitness to serve, and (7) a material breach of the Incentive Agreement.

“Corporate Change” shall mean the first to occur of any of the following events: (1) any person acquires 50% or more of our common stock or voting securities, other than (a) any acquisition directly from or resulting from an acquisition of our shares by the Company, (b) any acquisition by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any entity controlled by the Company, or (c) any acquisition by any entity pursuant to a transaction which complies with clauses (a) or (b); (2) the occurrence of a merger, reorganization, consolidation or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, unless our shareholders prior to such transaction hold more than 50% of the equity and voting power of the resulting entity or entity holding such assets, no person (other than benefit plans of such entity) holds 50% or more of the equity or voting power of such entity and at least a majority of the board of directors of such entity were members of the Incumbent Board; (3) our shareholders approve our complete liquidation or dissolution; or (4) under the Incentive Agreement, within any period of 24 consecutive months and subject to certain exceptions, a change in the composition of the board of directors of the Company such that the incumbent board ceases for any reason to constitute a least a majority of the Board.

“Constructive Termination Event” shall occur upon: (1) the failure by us to pay the executive’s compensation as provided in the applicable agreement; (2) relocation without his consent of his primary employment location of more than 50 miles; (3) our request that the executive perform any illegal activity or sign-off on any inappropriate financial statement or acknowledgement; (4) a material diminution in the executive’s position, duties, responsibilities, reporting status, or authority; or (5) a material negative reduction in base salary or incentive compensation targets within six months after a Corporate Change, except that before exercising his right to terminate the employment relationship pursuant to any of the previous provisions, he must first give written notice to our Board of the circumstances purportedly giving rise to his right to terminate and must provide us with a minimum of thirty days (fifteen days under the Incentive Agreement) to correct the problem, unless correction is inherently impossible.

“Disability” under the Employment Agreement and Retention Agreement shall mean the executive’s becoming incapacitated by accident, sickness or other circumstance that in the reasonable opinion of a qualified doctor approved by our Board, renders him mentally or physically incapable of performing the essential functions of the executive’s position, with or without reasonable accommodation, and that will continue, in the reasonable opinion of the doctor, for a period of no less than 180 days.

“Disability” under the Incentive Agreement means any ailment or condition that prevents the executive from actively carrying out his duties under the Incentive Agreement for a continuous period of 120 days.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  58


Back to Contents

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE 2014 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Proxy Statement 2022  |  59

 

The“Involuntary Termination” shall mean, for purposes of the Employment Agreement and Retention Agreement, a termination by the executive due to a Constructive Termination Event by itself or in relation to a Corporate Change, or by us for any reason without Cause, at the discretion of our Board; an “Involuntary Termination” also includes the nonrenewal of the executive’s employment agreement by the Board. Under the Incentive Agreement, an Involuntary Termination has the meaning defined in the description of such agreement above.

“Voluntary Termination” shall mean a termination by the executive other than for a Constructive Termination Event.

Group 1 Automotive 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan provides that, upon

Upon the occurrence of a Corporate Change, the CompensationCHR Committee may fully vest any restricted stock awards then outstanding and, upon such vesting, all restrictions applicable to the restricted stock will terminate. Further, the Committee may determine that the performance conditions are satisfied for the performance share awards upon a Corporate Change if the participant is also terminated without cause or for good reason in connection with the Corporate Change, constitutes a change inor the ownershipparticipant’s award is not assumed or effective control of us or of a substantial portion of our assets, withinconverted by the meaning of Section 409A ofcontrolling entity following the Code, the Compensation Committee may require the mandatory surrender of phantom stock awards upon payment of the maximum value of such awards to their holders.Corporate Change.

The 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan provides that aA Corporate Change occurs if (1) we are dissolved and liquidated; (2) if we are not the surviving entity in any merger or consolidation (or we survive only as a subsidiary of an entity); (3) if we sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of our assets to any other person or entity; (4) any person, entity or group acquires or gains ownership or control of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of our voting stock; or (5) after a contested election of directors, the persons who were directors before such election cease to constitute a majority of our Board of Directors.

Our named executive officers do not currently, and at December 31, 20182021 did not, hold any unvested stock options, or phantom stock awards, and therefore there are no amounts to report with respect to acceleration of stock option awards or payment of phantom stock awards by the CompensationCHR Committee in connection with a Corporate Change.

The award agreements for restricted stock under the Company’s 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan also establish vesting provisions applicable to termination of employment. The award agreement for all grants of restricted stock to our named executive officers, provides for accelerated vesting if the named executive officer’s employment is terminated due to death or disability. The award agreements also provide for accelerated vesting in the case of death or disability and induring the case oftwo-year period following a qualified retirement. A “qualified retirement” iswith respect to the 2021 awards generally means a retirement after attaining the age of 63 and following the date on which the sum of the executive’s age and years of service equals or exceeds the age of 70, and so long as the executive has completed in aggregate, five years of service, and upon satisfaction of a two year non-compete and certain non-disclosure covenants. A “qualified retirement” with respect to awards granted prior to 2021 generally means a termination of employment on a date that is on or after the employee’s attainment of age 63 and following the employee’s completion of at least ten years of service with the Company and upon satisfaction of a two year non-compete and certain non-disclosure covenants. Additionally, awards granted during the year employment is terminated will vest, provided the executive received such award at least six months prior to termination.

NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENTSThe performance share agreements for our named executive officers provides that upon a named executive’s officer’s termination due to death or disability, the performance shares will pay out following the performance period based on actual performance. If a named executive officer’s employment is terminated due to a “planned retirement” (generally defined as a mutually agreed upon retirement by the officer and the Company), the performance shares will convert to time-based restricted stock awards that will continue to vest, subject to the officer’s compliance with applicable restrictive covenants, until the second anniversary of the named executive officer’s termination of employment. Such a conversion will occur based on the actual performance achieved during the performance period. All other terminations of employment (other than as described above in connection with a Corporate Change) will result in a forfeiture of the performance shares without payment. As described in the CD&A above, the 2021 performance shares were also granted with a Maximum Value limitation. For performance share awards granted prior to 2021, a similar maximum value limitation applied, but that limitation applied to both TSR and ROIC-based awards, to be calculated separately. These value limits could potentially alter the number of shares that become payable in connection with an acceleration or payment event.

 

LOGO


LOGO

Non-Competition Agreements

Along with their respective employment agreements, Mr. Hesterberg has entered into a Non-Compete Agreement and Mr. Rickel hasMessrs. Kenningham and McHenry have entered into an Incentive Compensation and Non-Compete Agreement with us,the Company, each of which provide that for a period of two years following the executive’s termination of employment, the executive will not compete with usthe Company or induce any of our employees to leave his or her employment with us or hire any of our employees.

If Mr. Hesterberg violates this agreement, he will also forfeit his rights to any restricted stock and stock options granted pursuant to his employment agreement, and we will have the right to refrain from making any further payments under that agreement, as well as to receive back from Mr. Hesterberg the full value of any payments which were made to him in the previous twelve months as well as the value of any restricted stock or stock options that may have vested during the past twelve months from the date of Mr. Hesterberg’s termination. If Mr. RickelMcHenry violates his agreement, we will have the right to demand forfeiture of any cash or equity award realized during the twelve months prior to the violation.

If Mr. Kenningham violates his agreement, we will have the right to refrain from making any further payments under his Incentive Agreement.

Messrs. Hesterberg and Grese are eligible for a “qualified retirement”, as previously described under “2018“2021 Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Long Term Equity Incentive Compensation,” and therefore would be subject to the two year non-compete agreement described therein. Messrs. Kenningham, RickelMcHenry and DeLongchamps currently arewere not eligible for a qualified retirement.retirement as of December 31, 2021.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  59

Termination and Change in Control Tables for 2018

TERMINATION AND CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLES FOR 2021

The following tables summarizepresent for each named executive officer, the compensationestimated payments and other benefits that would have becomebeen payable to each named executive officer assuming hisas of the end of 2021 in the event of a termination of employment and a Corporate Change, as narratively described above.

These estimated amounts have been calculated as if the individual’s employment had been terminated, for the reasons specified below onor a Corporate Change had occurred, as of December 31, 2018, given, if applicable,2021, the named executive officer’s base salary aslast business day of that date2021, and theusing a closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2018 (the last trading day of the year),2021 which was $52.72. In addition,$195.22. The equity award calculations in the following tables summarizetable below do not include performance shares because the compensation that would become payable to Messrs. Hesterberg and Rickel assuming that a Corporate Change of the Company coupled with an involuntary reduction of his salary or incentive compensation target had occurred on December 31, 2018.performance period has not been fulfilled.

 

 
Earl J. Hesterberg Involuntary
Termination
($)
 Constructive
Termination
($)
 Corporate
Change
($)
 Death and
Disability
($)
  Involuntary
Termination
($)
 Constructive
Termination
($)
   Corporate
Change1
($)
   Death and
Disability
($)
 
Salary and Bonus  2,587,500   2,587,500   4,312,500   1,437,500    3,720,000   3,720,000    5,580,000    2,480,000 
Equity Compensation(1)  6,158,276  6,158,276  6,158,276  6,158,276 

Equity Compensation2

   18,977,141   18,977,141    18,977,141    18,977,141 
Use of Vehicle  8,743   8,743   8,743   17,486    17,574   17,574    17,574    35,148 
TOTAL  8,754,519   8,754,519   10,479,519   7,613,262    22,714,715   22,714,715    24,574,715    21,492,289 
       
 

Daryl A. Kenningham

  Involuntary
Termination
($)
 Constructive
Termination
($)
   Corporate
Change1
($)
   Death and
Disability
($)
 

Salary and Bonus

   1,881,000   1,881,000    1,881,000     

Equity Compensation

   7,694,206   7,694,206    7,694,206    7,694,206 

TOTAL

   9,575,206   9,575,206    9,575,206    7,694,206 
       
 

Daniel McHenry

  Involuntary
Termination
($)
 Constructive
Termination
($)
   Corporate
Change1
($)
   Death and
Disability
($)
 

Salary and Bonus

   475,1593           475,159 

Equity Compensation

          2,315,504    2,315,504 

TOTAL

   475,159       2,315,504    2,790,663 

 

(1)The amount
LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  60


Proxy Statement 2022  |  61

     

Frank Grese, Jr.

  Involuntary
Termination
($)
   Constructive
Termination
($)
   Corporate
Change1
($)
   Death and
Disability
($)
 

Equity Compensation2

           3,711,913    3,711,913 

TOTAL

           3,711,913    3,711,913 
        
     

Peter C. DeLongchamps

  Involuntary
Termination
($)
   Constructive
Termination
($)
   Corporate
Change1
($)
   Death and
Disability
($)
 

Equity Compensation

           3,752,324    3,752,324 

TOTAL

           3,752,324    3,752,324 
1

For Messrs. Hesterberg and Kenningham, the amounts in this column reflect the table was calculated by multiplying $52.72 bycash payments and acceleration value of equity award benefits that would become payable upon a qualifying termination following a Corporate Change. Upon a Corporate Change without an accompanying qualifying termination, Messrs. Hesterberg and Kenningham, along with the 116,811 unvested shares of restricted stock Mr. Hesterberg held on December 31, 2018 that we assume for purposes of this calculationremaining named executive officers, would also be subjecteligible to receive accelerated vesting to equal $6,158,276.

Daryl A. Kenningham Involuntary
Termination
($)
 Constructive
Termination
($)
 Corporate
Change(2)
($)
 Death and
Disability
($)
Equity Compensation(1)         1,806,451   1,806,451 
TOTAL        1,806,451   1,806,451 

(1)The amount in the table was calculated by multiplying $52.72 by the 34,265 unvested shares of restricted stock Mr. Kenningham held on December 31, 2018 that we assume for purposes of this calculation would be subject to accelerated vesting, to equal $1,806,451.
(2)Assumes Compensation Committee determines to accelerate vestingoutstanding equity awards in connection with a Corporate Change.

John C. Rickel Involuntary
Termination
($)
 Constructive
Termination
($)
 Corporate
Change
($)
 Death and
Disability
($)
Salary and Bonus  1,289,355   1,289,355   2,188,905   689,655 
Equity Compensation(1)   2,098,783   2,098,783   2,098,783   2,098,783 
Use of Vehicle  1,630   1,630   1,630   3,260 
TOTAL  3,389,768   3,389,768   4,289,318   2,791,698 

(1)The amount inChange only upon the table was calculated by multiplying $52.72 bysole discretion of the 39,810 unvested shares of restricted stock Mr. Rickel held on December 31, 2018 thatCHR Committee, which we assumehave assumed to have occurred for purposes of this calculation would be subject to accelerated vesting, to equal $2,098,783.

table.

Frank Grese, Jr. Involuntary
Termination
($)
 Constructive
Termination
($)
 Corporate
Change(2)
($)
 Death and
Disability
($)
Equity Compensation(1)         1,376,519   1,376,519 
TOTAL        1,376,519   1,376,519 

(1)The amount in the table was calculated by multiplying $52.72 by the 26,110 unvested shares of restricted stock Mr. Grese held on December 31, 2018 that we assume for purposes of this calculation would be subject to accelerated vesting, to equal $1,376,519.
(2)Assumes Compensation Committee determines to accelerate vesting in connection with a Corporate Change.

Peter C. DeLongchamps Involuntary
Termination
($)
 Constructive
Termination
($)
 Corporate
Change(2)
($)
 Death and
Disability
($)
Equity Compensation(1)         1,521,130   1,521,130 
TOTAL        1,521,130   1,521,130 

(1)The amount in the table was calculated by multiplying $52.72 by the 28,853 unvested shares of restricted stock Mr. DeLongchamps held on December 31, 2018 that we assume for purposes of this calculation would be subject to accelerated vesting, to equal $1,521,130.
(2)Assumes Compensation Committee determines to accelerate vesting in connection with a Corporate Change.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  2 

Although Messrs. Hesterberg and Grese have attained the age for a qualified retirement, each executive would be eligible to receive unvested restricted stock only if he remained compliant with his restrictive covenants.

3

For Mr. McHenry, this amount only relates to a termination by the Company without Cause, or in the event of Death and Disability.

  60

LOGO


Back to Contents

LOGO

Director Compensation

 

2018 Director Compensation Table

2021 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation we paid to our non-employee directors in 2018.2021. Directors who are our full-time employees, currently Messrs. Hesterberg and Pereira, receive no compensation for serving as directors. The only current employees serving as directors are Earl J. Hesterberg, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Lincoln Pereira, Regional Vice President, Brazil, and Chairman of UAB. AllMr. Hesterberg’s compensation paid to Mr. Hesterberg as an employee may be found aboveis shown in the Summary Compensation Table.Table and related tables above and Mr. Pereira’s compensation is discussed in the section titled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

 

 
Name Fees
Earned
or
Paid in
Cash
($)
 Stock
Awards(1)(2)
($)
 All Other
Compensation(3)
($)
 Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
($)
 Total
($)
  Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash1
($)
   Stock
Awards2,3
($)
   All Other
Compensation4
($)
   Change in
Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings5
($)
   Total
($)
 
John L. Adams 60,052  189,948  19,853  142,411  412,264 
Carin M. Barth 62,211  189,948  17,600  1  269,760    70,021    199,979    20,000    11    290,011 

Steven C. Mizell6

   37,698    167,598    16,722        222,018 
Stephen D. Quinn 156,552  189,948  17,600  132,728  496,828    158,771    199,979    20,000        378,750 
J. Terry Strange 69,052  189,948  17,600  52,257  328,857 

Steven P. Stanbrook

   45,021    199,979    20,000        265,000 
Charles L. Szews 46,552  189,948  17,600    254,100    60,021    199,979    20,000        280,000 
Anne Taylor(5)  14,433  61,421  5,643    81,497 
Max P. Watson, Jr. 60,052  189,948  17,600    267,600 

Max P. Watson, Jr.7

   22,521    199,979    10,000        232,500 

Anne Taylor

   60,021    199,979    20,000    1,794    281,794 
MaryAnn Wright 45,052  189,948  17,600  6  252,606    51,271    199,979    20,000    20    271,270 
1

The amounts in this column include the cash value of a fractional share awarded as part of the equity-based compensation retainer as described in more detail in the narrative.

 

(1)2

The amounts included in the “Stock Awards” column represent the grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions made in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 5 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2)3

Our directors are offered the option of taking their annual retainer in restricted stock or restricted stock units. In 20182021 each non-employee director received 2,6401,576 shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units in payment of the equity portion of the 20182021 annual retainer, with the exception of Ms. Taylor whoretainer. Mr. Mizell joined the board on September 5, 2018Board March 1, 2021, and received a pro rata annualprorated retainer of 8071,069 shares of restricted stock. As of December 31, 2018, Ms. Taylor held 807 shares of restricted stock for which forfeitures had not lapsed. Prior to 2019,2021.

4

The amounts in this column reflect the forfeiture restrictions on restricted stock lapsed fully after six months.annual vehicle stipend.

(3)5Reflects the maximum cost associated with the personal use of one Company vehicle or the economic equivalent.
(4)

Amounts reported reflect above-market earnings on the Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts are reflective of earnings in excess of 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate, with compounding, of 3.12%1.56%. We do not sponsor a pension plan.

(5)Ms. Taylor joined the Board on September 5, 2018.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  6 

Mr. Mizell was appointed to the Board on March 1, 2021.

7

Mr. Watson retired from the Board effective May 12, 2021.

LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  6162


Back to Contents

Proxy Statement 2022  |  63

Retainers and Fees

RETAINERS AND FEES

The table below sets forth the compensation components we paid to our non-employee directors which governed the 20182021 compensation program:

 

Retainer and Meeting Fees(1)1

  20182021
($)
 

Annual Retainer

   

Annual Cash Retainer

 45,000 

Equity Retainer(2)2

  190,000200,000 

Additional Annual Retainers

   

Non-Executive Chairman Chair of the Board3

 100,000 

Audit Committee Chair

 25,000 

Compensation & Human Resources Committee Chair

 15,000 

Finance/Risk Management Committee Chair

 15,000 
Nominating/

Governance & Corporate Responsibility Committee Chair4

 10,000 
Board and Committee Meeting Fees(3)

Annual Vehicle Stipend

   
Board Meetings
Audit Committee Meetings
Non-Audit Committee Meetings
Vehicle Stipend17,60020,000 

(1)1

All cash retainer amounts are paid quarterly.

(2)2

The equity portion of the retainer is paid annually in restricted stock or restricted stock units valued at approximately $190,000$200,000 at the time of the grant pursuant to the 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan.

(3)No meeting fees will be paid unless the Board or Committee meets more than eight times per year. In the event a Committee or the Board meets more than eight times in one year, meeting fees will be paid to the Board or respective Committee members, on a quarterly basis in the amount of $2,500 for each Board meeting or audit committee meeting and $1,500 for each non-audit committee meeting.

 

3

The annual retainer for the Non-Executive Chair of the Board was increased to $135,000, effective November 16, 2021.

4

The annual retainer for the GCR Committee Chair was increased to $15,000, effective November 16, 2021.

Equity-Based Compensation

EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION

The equity portion of our non-employee directors’ retainers is paid annually in restricted stock or restricted stock units valued at approximately $190,000$200,000 at the time of the grant pursuant to the 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan. Directors canIn 2021, directors could elect whether to receive the equity retainer in restricted stock or restricted stock units. In 2018,2021, all of our then current Directorsdirectors elected to receive their annual retainer in restricted stock, except for Ms. Barth, Mr. Mizell, Ms. Taylor and Ms. Wright, who each elected to receive restricted stock units. The grant was effective January 2, 20184, 2021 and was determined based on the average of the high and low market price of our common stock on that date. Accordingly, each non-employee director received 2,6401,576 shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units in payment of the equity portion of the 20182021 annual retainer. Ms. TaylorMr. Mizell was elected to the Board on September 5, 2018.March 1, 2021. Upon herhis election, shehe received a pro rata annual retainer of 8071,069 shares of restricted stock.stock units.

Prior to 2019, the forfeiture restrictions on restricted stock lapsed fully after six months. Beginning January 1, 2019, the restrictedRestricted stock or restricted stock units granted to our directors vest immediately upon issuance. All vested restricted stock unitsawards held by a director will settle upon the retirement, death or disability of the director. TheUnder grants of restricted stock units made prior to 2019, the vested restricted stock units held by a director are settled in cash or shares of our common stock upon the termination of the director’s membership on our Board of Directors. EffectiveBeginning with grants of restricted stock units made following January 1, 2019, all restricted stock units will beare settled in cash. In the event that a director’s membership on our Board of Directors is terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability, the director, for no consideration, forfeits to us all of his unvested restricted stock units. Any unvested restricted stock and any restricted stock units may not be sold or otherwise transferred.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  62
Back to Contents

Stock Ownership Guidelines

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

Our Board has adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines that apply to our non-employee directors. The guidelines currently requireIn November 2021, following discussion with PM&P, upon the recommendation of the GCR Committee, the Board approved updates to the Stock Ownership Guidelines. Under the updated Stock Ownership Guidelines, our non-employee directors are required to own and hold 10,000maintain stock ownership value of $450,000 (“Director Ownership Requirement”) within five years. Once the Director Ownership Requirement is achieved, directors may sell or otherwise dispose of any shares in excess of the $450,000 value. In the event a director’s stock ownership value falls below the Director Ownership Requirement because of a decline in stock price, the director is prohibited from selling or otherwise disposing of shares of ourthe Company’s common stock. The holding requirement was determined based on competitive stock until the Director Ownership Requirement is reestablished through open

LOGO


LOGO

market practice. Stock ownership levels should be achieved by eachpurchases or annual director within five yearsequity grants. Restricted stock granted to directors as part of first appointmentthe annual retainer counts toward the Director Ownership Requirement without regard to the Board.vesting or other liquidity provisions related thereto. Stock that applies toward satisfaction of these guidelines includes: (1) shares of common stock owned outright by the director and his or her immediate family members who share the same household, whether held individually or jointly and (2) awarded restricted stock and restricted stock unit shares. Each of our directors has met, or will meet within the applicable timeframe, our current stock ownership requirements for non-employee directors.Director Ownership Requirements.

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

In November 2020, the CHR Committee approved an amendment and restatement to the Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2021. Under the amended and restated plan, non-employee directors can no longer defer director compensation under the plan. However, previously deferred amounts remain deferred under the plan until the originally scheduled payment date. Please see the section entitled “Executive Compensation — Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Messrs. Adams, Quinn and Strange have elected to participate inCompensation” for a more fulsome description of the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan described in greater detail above. Theand the material changes approved under the amended and restated plan.

Prior to amending the Deferred Compensation Plan effective January 1, 2021, the plan providesprovided those directors who electelected to participate an opportunity to accumulate additional savings for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. The non-employee directors maycould defer any portion of the cash compensation (annual retainer or meeting fees) that he or she receivesreceived with respect to the services provided to our Board, including any committee services, and the director willwould be 100% vested in his account at all times. We have complete discretion over how the deferred funds are utilized and they represent our unsecured obligation to the participants.

COMPENSATION CHANGES FOR FISCAL 2022

Deferred amounts will be deemedAs described above, in November 2021, following review of a competitive market analysis prepared by PM&P, the GCR Committee recommended an increase in the annual retainers paid to be notionally invested in such fund as the participants shall designate. MostNon-Executive Chair of the funds are also availableBoard and the GCR Committee Chair. Accordingly, the Board approved an increase in the Group 1 401(k) Savings Plan exceptannual retainer for the Group 1 Guaranteed Crediting Rate investment option which isNon-Executive Chair of the default investment optionBoard from $100,000 to $135,000 and only available infor the Deferred Compensation Plan.GCR Committee Chair from $10,000 to $15,000. The Group 1 Guaranteed Crediting Rate investment option is a declared interest rate, which is set by the Compensation Committee annually. The deferred interest rate for 2018 was set at 8.0%.

Ms. Barth and Ms. Wright, while not elected plan participants, have the cash portion of a marginal share fromincreases to the annual equity retainer deferred into the Deferred Compensation Plan.retainers were approved in order to maintain market competitiveness.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  6364


Back to Contents

LOGO

Proxy Statement 2022  |  65

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

 

SEC regulations require that we provide a comparison of the annual total compensation of Earl Hesterberg, our Chief Executive Officer in 2018,2021, to the annual total compensation of an individual identified as our median compensated employee. For purposes2021, our last completed fiscal year:

Mr. Hesterberg’s annual total compensation was $8,577,257

Our median employee’s total compensation was $54,880

The ratio of providing the comparison in accordance with SEC regulations, we identified a “median employee” and compared Mr. Hesterberg’s annual total compensation to thatour median employee’s annual total compensation was 156 to 1.

SEC rules allow us to use the employee identified in 2020 for three years. However, this individual was on leave for a substantial part of 2021. Therefore, for 2021 we selected an employee with substantially similar compensation to the 2020 identified median employee. For 2018,

We identified our last completed2020 median compensated employee based on our population as of December 31, 2020. We used a consistently applied compensation measure which included total gross wages using our payroll records for fiscal year:2020. We converted the amount of compensation paid to non-U.S. employees to U.S. dollars using average foreign currency exchange rates for 2020. We annualized compensation for employees hired during 2020.

Mr. Hesterberg’s annual total compensation was $6,903,654
Our median employee’s total compensation was $50,931
The ratio of Mr. Hesterberg’s annual total compensation to our median employee’s annual total compensation was 135 to 1.

The methodology that weAnnual 2021 total compensation for the identified median employee and our CEO was calculated according to the SEC rules used to identify the median employee is described below. Annual total compensation is calculated in the same manner as the amount set forth incalculate the “Total” column in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table.

We believe the pay ratio information set forth above constitutes a reasonable estimate, calculated in a manner consistent with applicable SEC regulations.

Because other companies may use different methodologies to identify their median employees, the pay ratio set forth above may not be comparable to the pay ratios used by other companies.

LOGO


LOGO

Methodology

Date Used to Determine Employee Population –For purposes of identifying the median employee, we selected December 31, 2017 to be the date as of which we would determine our employee population.

Composition of Employee Population –We determined that, as of December 31, 2017, we had three separate employee populations - Brazil, the U.K. and the U.S., with a total of 13,077 employees globally.

Given availability of payroll data, the size, composition and global diversity of these 13,077 employees, we employed statistical sampling to assist in identification of the median employee. We stratified the employee population based on similarity of characteristics such as geography into groups. We then took the natural log of compensation data for each employee within the group. This natural log of compensation provided us with the data used in the “consistently applied compensation measure (“CACM”) discussed below. From the log normal data, we calculated median, standard deviation and variance of each group for the purposes of deriving sample sizes that fairly represented the grouping. Using this methodology, we generated a random sample of 1,838 employees. The group medians were then weighted by total group headcount relative to Group 1’s 13,077 employees to derive the median employee.

Pay Data Used – To identify the median employee, we derived compensation information from our payroll records for fiscal 2017. We used a CACM which included total taxable income, or equivalent. We converted the amount of compensation paid to non-U.S. employees to U.S. dollars using average foreign currency exchange rates for 2017. We annualized compensation for full-time employees hired during 2017.

SEC rules permit companies to identify the median paid employee once every three years as long as there has been no change in the company’s employee population or compensation arrangements that significantly impacts the pay ratio disclosure. Since 2017 we have completed several acquisitions in the U.K. The additional employees from the acquisitions are homogenously distributed in terms of level and compensation to the existing population resulting in immaterial changes in our organization. Therefore, we are employing the same methodology used last year, as described above, to identify the median employee.

Using this methodology, there were several employees whose CACM aggregated around median. For consistency purposes, we chose to use the employee who was located in the U.S. with more consistent year over year compensation for purposes of the comparison to Mr. Hesterberg’s annual total compensation.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  64

Certain Relationships and Related

Transactions

 

Transactions

TRANSACTIONS

During fiscal year 20182021 we were not, and we are not currently, a party to a transaction or series of transactions in which the amount involved did or may exceed $120,000, in which any of our directors, executive officers, any holder of more than 5% of our common stock or any member of the immediate family of any of these persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, except as described below and the compensation arrangements (including with respect to equity compensation) described in “2018“2021 Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation.”

Information below pertains to certain related party transactions related to the operations of our subsidiary UAB, which we acquired in February 2013. All of the operations of UAB are in Brazil. The conversion of amounts expressed in Brazilian Reais to U.S. Dollars was calculated by using the average currency exchange rate for 2018,2021, as provided by Oanda. The applicable exchange rates are: R$3.655.3950 = USD$1.00.

LINCOLN PEREIRA ANDLincoln Pereira and UAB

During 20182021 we paid Lincoln Pereira, a Director of our Company, R$945,264.001,107,778.00 (USD$258,976.44)205,334.20) cash compensation for his services as our Regional Vice President, Brazil and as Chairman of our Brazilian subsidiary, UAB, and R$104,643.02158,997.90 (USD$28,669.32)29,471.34) for health insurance. Also, we paid R$472,632.00 (USD$129,488.22) as an annual Corporate Bonus regarding 2017 achievements.

Mr. Pereira’s brother, Ricardo Ribeiro da Cunha Pereira, serves as Commercial Vice President, Paraná.Honda’s General Manager. During 20182021 the Company paid Mr. Ricardo Pereira R$483,740.42706,650.55 (USD$132,531.62)130,982.49) in total compensation, consisting of R$411,932.58648,497.61 (USD$112,858.24)120,203.45) of cash compensation and R$71,807.8458,152.94 (USD$19,673.38)10,779.04) for health insurance. Also, we paid R$38,000.00 (USD$10,410.96) as an annual Corporate Bonus regarding 2017 achievements.

Mr. Pereira’s brother, Andre Ribeiro, servesserved as Commercial Operations Director.Director until his death in May 2021. During 2018,2021, the Company paid Mr. Ribeiro R$977,389.28653,320.69 (USD$267,777.88)121,097.44) in total cash compensation, and R$95,413.33228,290.92 (USD$26,104.64)42,315.28) for health insurance. Also, we paid R$471,027.84 (USD$129,048.72) as an annual Corporate Bonus regarding 2017 achievements.

UAB leases office and retail space at market rates from Santorini Negócios Imobiliários Ltda. (“Santorini”), a real estate company which was co-founded by Mr. Pereira. The lease provides for monthly payments of R$136,543.00180,000 (USD$37,409.04)33,364.23) and is adjusted annually pursuant to the IGP-M/FGV index. The lease expires in February 2029 but can be terminated with one monthone-month prior notice, subject to a three month early-termination penalty payment. Current owners of Santorini include Mr. Pereira’s wife, Anna Luiza Flecha de Lima da Cunha Pereira, who also manages the property, Irene Maria Flecha de Lima, Mr. Pereira’s mother-in-law, and Andrea Maria Flecha da Lima, Mr. Pereira’s sister-in-law. Total payments to Santorini in 20182021 are R$1,638,516.002,387,193.40 (USD$448,908.49)442,482.55). Mr. Pereira holds no ownership interest in Santorini.

UAB also leases office space at market rates from Irene Maria Flecha de Lima, Mr. Pereira’s mother-in-law.mother-in-law, and managed by Anna Luiza Flecha de Lima da Cunha Pereira (Mr. Pereira’s wife) and Andrea Maria Flecha da Lima (Mr. Pereira’s sister-in-law). The lease provides for monthly payments of R$16,871.0017,302.66 (USD$4,622.19)3,207.16) and is adjusted annually pursuant to the IGP-M/FGV index. The lease expired in October 2015 but can be terminated at any time with one monthone-month prior notice. Total payments to Irene Maria Flecha de Lima in 20182021 are R$202,452.00211,512.68 (USD$55,466.30)39,205.32).

Mr. Pereira’s cousin, Joao Candido Cunha Pereira, represents UAB in legal court cases solely relating to the State of Paraná. These legal services are governed by a contractual relationship signed in January 2012 for an undetermined term and can be terminated at any time with 90 days’ notice. All legal rates are at or below the current market rate for such legal services. Total payments to Joao Candido Cunha Pereira in 20182021 are R$395,061.376,150 (USD$108.235.99)1,139.94). UAB previously was also represented in legal matters by Cunha Pereira Law Firm, which was controlled by Mr. Pereira and his father. Mr. Pereira closed the Cunha Pereira Law Firm in 2016.

 

UAB purchases newspaper and radio advertising space from RPC Comunicações (“RPC”), a communications group in the state of Parana owned by Therezinha Cunha Pereira, Guilherme Cunha Pereira and Ana Amelia Cunha Pereira, Mr. Pereira’s aunt and two cousins, respectively. The prices are negotiated based on a price list published by RPC. UAB’s marketing department purchases the advertising space directly from RPC without any involvement from Mr. Pereira, at or below current market rates for such services, on an “as-needed” basis. There were no payments to RPC in 2018.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  6566


Proxy Statement 2022  |  67

Policies and Procedures

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

We review all relationships and transactions in which we and our directors and named executive officers or their immediate family members are participants to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest. Our General Counsel’s office is primarily responsible for the development and implementation of written procedures and controls to obtain information from the directors and named executive officers with respect to related person transactions and for subsequently determining, based on the facts and circumstances disclosed to them, whether we or a related person has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction. As required under the SEC’s rules, transactionsTransactions that are determined to be directly or indirectly material to us or a related person are disclosed as required in documents, including our proxy statement, filed with the SEC when required, and disclosed in our proxy statement.

SEC.

Our Code of Conduct discourages all conflicts of interest, requires disclosure and provides guidance on handling conflicts of interest. Under the Code of Conduct, conflicts of interest occur when private or family interests interfere in any way, or even appear to interfere, with the interests of our Company. Our restrictions on conflicts of interest under the Code of Conduct include related person transactions.

We have multiple processes for reporting conflicts of interests, and related person transactions. Under the Code of Conduct, all employees are required to report any actual or apparent conflict of interest, or potential conflict of interest, to their supervisors and all related person transactions involving our regional or market executives must be communicated in writing as part of their quarterly representation letter. This information is then reviewed by our Internal Audit Department, General Counsel, Audit Committee, our Board or our independent registered public accounting firm, as deemed necessary, and discussed with management. As part of this review, the following factors are generally considered:

 

the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction;
the material terms of the transaction, including, without limitation, the amount and type of transaction;
the importance of the transaction to the related person;
the importance of the transaction to a third party;
the importance of the transaction to us;
whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a director, named executive officer or employee to act in the best interest of our Company;
whether the transaction might affect the status of a director as independent under the independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange; and
any other matters deemed appropriate with respect to the particular transaction.

the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction;

 

the material terms of the transaction, including, without limitation, the amount and type of transaction;

the importance of the transaction to the related person;

the importance of the transaction to a third party;

the importance of the transaction to us;

whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a director, named executive officer or employee to act in the best interest of our Company;

whether the transaction might affect the status of a director as independent under the independence standards of the NYSE; and

any other matters deemed appropriate with respect to the particular transaction.

Ultimately, all such transactions must be approved or ratified by our Board. Any member of our Board who is a related person with respect to a transaction is recused from the review of the transaction.

In addition, our legal staff annually distributes a questionnaire to our named executive officers and members of our Board requesting certain information regarding, among other things, their immediate family members, employment and beneficial ownership interests. This information is then reviewed for any conflicts of interest under the Code of Conduct. At the completion of the annual audit, our Audit Committee and the independent registered public accounting firm review with management, insider and related person transactions and potential conflicts of interest. In addition, our internal audit function has processes in place, under its written procedure policies, to identify related person transactions and potential conflicts of interest and report them to senior management and the Audit Committee.

We also have other policies and procedures to prevent conflicts of interest. For example, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that our Board assess the independence of the non-management directors at least annually, including a requirement that it determine whether or not any such directors have a material relationship with us, either directly or indirectly, as defined therein and as further described under “Information about our Board and its Committees — Independence of the Members of our Board.Board Independence.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
  66

LOGO


Back to Contents

LOGO

Security Ownership Information

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table shows the amount of our common stock beneficially owned (unless otherwise indicated) by our directors and nominees, our named executive officers, our current directors and named executive officers as a group, and any stockholdersshareholders with over 5% of our common stock. Under SEC rules, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, such security. A person is also deemed to be the beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under such rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may disclaim any beneficial interest. Except as otherwise indicated, directors and named executive officers possessed sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock in the table. In addition, except as otherwise indicated, all information is as of March 19, 2019.21, 2022.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) Aggregate Number
of Shares Owned(2)
 Percent of Class
Outstanding(3)
Earl J. Hesterberg  311,132    1.7%
Daryl A. Kenningham  61,314    * 
John C. Rickel  137,751    * 
Frank Grese, Jr.  39,951    * 
Peter C. DeLongchamps  52,225    * 
John L. Adams  68,184(4)   * 
Carin M. Barth  8,334    * 
Lincoln Pereira  253,054(5)   1.4%
Stephen D. Quinn  46,076    * 
J. Terry Strange  52,052   * 
Charles L. Szews  8,878   * 
Anne Taylor  4,370   * 
Max P. Watson, Jr.  59,746   * 
MaryAnn Wright  11,866   * 
All Directors and Named Executive Officers as a group (14 persons)  1,114,933(6)   6.0%
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52ndStreet
New York, NY 10055
  2,700,264(7)   14.6%
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355
  1,924,769(8)   10.4%
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP.
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, TX 78746
  1,667,024(9)   9.0%
Eminence Capital, LP
399 Park Avenue, 25thFloor
New York, NY 10022
  1,118,115(10)   6.1%
Manulife Financial Corporation
200 Bloor Street East
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4W 1E5
  936,483(11)   5.1%

   

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner1

  Aggregate
Number of
Shares
Owned2
  Percent of
Class Outstanding3
 

Earl J. Hesterberg

   257,6154   2.0

Daryl A. Kenningham

   53,5855   * 

Daniel McHenry

   20,118   * 

Frank Grese, Jr.

   22,624   * 

Peter C. DeLongchamps

   35,450   * 

Carin M. Barth

   2,131   * 

Steven C. Mizell

      * 

Lincoln Pereira

   153,1226   * 

Stephen D. Quinn

   50,676   * 

Steven P. Stanbrook

   7,018   * 

Charles L. Szews

   13,478   * 

Anne Taylor

   807   * 

MaryAnn Wright

      * 

All Directors and Named Executive Officers as a group (13 persons)

   627,5677   3.8

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

   2,983,6958   17.9

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

   1,910,6409   11.5

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP

6300 Bee Cave Road

Building One

Austin, TX 78746

   1,331,04110   8.0
*

Represents less than 1% of the outstanding common stock.

1
(1)

Except as otherwise indicated, the mailing address of each person or entity named in the table is Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77024.

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  2 67

(2)Includes restricted shares as to which the individual has voting, but not dispositive, power, as follows: Mr. Hesterberg (127,495(75,744 shares), Mr. Kenningham (38,828(33,429 shares), Mr. Rickel (38,322McHenry (10,687 shares), Mr. Grese (26,639(13,910 shares), Mr. DeLongchamps (27,301(14,146 shares), and Mr. Pereira (148,394(148,682 shares held in escrow, of which 113,649113,869 shares are designated for the UAB shareholders and 34,74534,813 shares are designated for Mr. Pereira). Does not include restricted stock units as to which the directors do not have voting or dispositive power, as follows: Ms. Barth (10,803 shares), Mr. Mizell (2,099 shares), Ms. Taylor (8,163 shares) and Ms. Wright (16,466 shares). Does not include unvested performance shares, as follows: Mr. Hesterberg (28,479 shares), Mr. Kenningham (14,996 shares), Mr. McHenry (2,992 shares), Mr. Grese (4,970 shares), Mr. DeLongchamps (5,140 shares), or 2020 performance shares that have met the performance criteria requirement, but not the time-based vesting requirement, as follows: Mr. Hesterberg (13,071 shares), Mr. Kenningham (6,354 shares), Mr. Grese (2,541 shares) and Mr. DeLongchamps (2,541 shares).

3
(3)

Based on total shares outstanding of 18,475,829,16,672,323 at March 19, 2019.21, 2022.

4

Includes 45,680 shares held by the Hesterberg Management Trust, for which Mr. Hesterberg and his spouse are co-trustees, 65,517 shares of common stock held in gift trusts for the benefit of Mr. Hesterberg’s children, for which he serves as Trustee, 4,953 shares held by Mr. Hesterberg’s spouse, and 65,517 shares held by the 2019 Family Trust for which Mr. Hesterberg’s spouse serves as Trustee.

LOGO  Proxy Statement 2022  |  68


Proxy Statement 2022  |  69

(4)5

Includes 2,00018,156 shares held indirectly throughby the SusieKenningham 2018 Management Trust, for which Mr. Kenningham and John L. Adams Family Foundation.his spouse are co-trustees.

6
(5)

Mr. Pereira has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 218,309,118,309 shares; all such shares are owned by Abbe Investments, Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company, owned 98% by Mr. Pereira and 2% by his spouse. In addition, Mr. Pereira has sole voting, but no dispositive, power with respect to 148,394148,682 shares held in escrow for the benefit of Mr. Pereira and João Alberto Gross Figueiró, the estate of André Ribeiro da Cunha Pereira, Maurício Vaz Rodrigues and Roger Penske, Jr., pursuant to a Stockholders’ Agreement dated February 28, 2013. Mr. Pereira has been designated the Stockholder Representative for those shares and directs voting of the shares. Of the 148,394,148,682, shares held in escrow, 34,745,34,813, shares have been designated for Mr. Pereira.

7 
(6)

Includes 258,587147,916 restricted shares as to which the named executive officers and directors currently have voting, but not dispositive, power, and 85,25437,531 restricted stock units as to which the named executive officers and directors do not have voting or dispositive power, although the restricted stock units do count towards the Company’s stock ownership requirements. Does not include 63,874 performance shares as to which the named executive officers do not have voting rights or dispositive power.

8 
(7)

As reported on Amendment No. 1014 to Schedule 13G as of December 31, 20182021 and filed with the SEC on January 28, 2019.27, 2022. BlackRock, Inc., as a parent holding company or control person, has sole voting power over 2,646,6922,927,107 shares, sole dispositive power over 2,700,2642,986,695 shares, and aggregate beneficial ownership of 2,700,2642,983,695 shares. The subsidiaries of BlackRock, Inc. that acquired the shares reported by BlackRock, Inc. are as follows: BlackRock Fund Advisors (which owns 5% or greater of the outstanding shares being reported in the Amendment No. 1014 to Schedule 13G), Aperio Group, LLC, BlackRock Life Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, National Association, BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd., BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd., BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG and BlackRock Investment Management, LLC. The interest of one such person, iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, in the common stock of the Company, is more than 5% of the total outstanding common stock.

9 
(8)

As reported on Amendment No. 914 to Schedule 13G dated as of February 28, 2019December 31, 2021 and filed with the SEC on March 11, 2019.February 10, 2022. The Vanguard Group, Inc. has sole voting power as to 17,800 shares, shared voting power over 2,65216,051 shares, sole dispositive power over 1,906,3741,879,907 shares, shared dispositive power over 18,39530,733 shares and aggregate beneficial ownership of 1,924,7691,910,640 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 15,743 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 4,709 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.

10 
(9)

As reported on Amendment No. 1316 to Schedule 13G dated as of December 31, 20182021 and filed with the SEC on February 8, 2019.2022, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, or certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, ��Dimensional”“Dimensional”) serve as investment manager to certain other commingled group trusts and separate accounts (such investment companies, trusts and accounts, collectively referred to as the “Funds”). In its role as investment advisor, sub-adviser and/or manager, Dimensional possesses voting and/or investment power over shares of our common stock that are owned by the Funds, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of such shares held by the Funds. Dimensional has sole voting power as to 1,639,3461,312,153 shares and sole dispositive power as to 1,667,0241,331,041 shares. Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares.securities. The Funds have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of the securities held in their respective accounts.

(10)As reported on Amendment No. 6 to Schedule 13G dated as of December 31, 2018 and filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019 by Eminence Capital, LP, Eminence GP, LLC, and Ricky C. Sandler. The foregoing entities and person beneficially own 1,118,115 shares of common stock. Eminence Capital, LP has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,117,880 shares of common stock, and Eminence GP, LLC has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 663,428 shares of common stock. Ricky C. Sandler is the beneficial owner of 1,118,115 shares of common stock, having sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 235 shares of common stock and shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,117,880 shares of common stock.
(11)As reported on Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G dated as of December 31, 2018 and filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019. Manulife Financial Corporation (“MFC”) is the parent holding company of Manulife Asset Management (US) LLC, an investment adviser (“MAM US”), and Manulife Asset Management Limited, a non-U.S. institution (“MAML”). MAM US has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 923,984 shares of common stock, and MAML has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 12,499 shares of common stock. Through its parent-subsidiary relationship to MAM US and MAML, MFC may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of these same shares. The principal business office of MAM (US) is located at 197 Clarendon Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02116.

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Our named executive officers, directors and any person who owns more than 10% of our common stock are required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act to file reports regarding their ownership of our stock. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of these reports furnished to us and written representations from these individuals that no other reports were required, we believe that all reporting requirements of Section 16(a) were met, except that, on August 31, 2018, a late Form 4 was filed to report the receipt and disposition by Mr. Pereira on May 15, 2017 of shares of our common stock held in escrow for the benefit of the UAB shareholders (as further described in footnote 5 to the Beneficial Ownership Table included herein).

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
  68

LOGO


Back to Contents

LOGO

Questions and Answers about the

Annual Meeting

 

What is the purpose of the meeting?

At our Annual Meeting, stockholders will act upon the matters outlined in the notice of meeting, including the election of nine director nominees, the advisory vote to approve executive compensation, the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, and the consideration of any other matters properly presented at the meeting. In addition, senior management will be available to respond to questions regarding our business and financial performance during fiscal year 2018.

Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?

WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE AT THE MEETING?

Only our stockholdersshareholders as of 5:00 p.m., Central Daylight SavingsSaving Time, on March 19, 201921, 2022 (the record date) are entitled to receive notice of the Annual Meeting and to vote at the meeting. On March 19, 2019,21, 2022, there were 18,475,82916,672,323 shares of Group 1 common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting.

How manyA list of shareholders will be available and may be inspected during normal business hours for a period of at least 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting at our offices at 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77024. The list of shareholders will also be available for your review during the Annual Meeting by accessing the meeting website during the Annual Meeting. In the event there are not sufficient votes may I cast?

You are entitledfor a quorum or to one vote for each share of Group 1 common stock you owned at 5:00 p.m., Central Daylight Savings Time, on March 19, 2019, on all matters presentedapprove the foregoing proposals at the meeting.time of the Annual Meeting, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned in order to permit further solicitation of proxies.

What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner or street name holder?

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SHAREHOLDER OF RECORD AND A BENEFICIAL OWNER OR STREET NAME HOLDER?

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our registrar and transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, you are considered a stockholdershareholder of record with respect to those shares.

If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares, and your shares are held in street name.

If you hold common stock inBOTHstreet name and as a stockholdershareholder of record,YOU MUST VOTE SEPARATELY for each position of common stock.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  69

Back to Contents

How doHOW DO I vote my shares?

VOTE MY SHARES?

If you are a stockholdershareholder of record on the record date, you may vote in person atonline during the Annual Meeting or by proxy using any of the following methods:

 

LOGOOnline — visit the website shown on the proxy card (www.proxyvote.com)(www.proxyvote.com) and follow the instructions at that website at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight SavingsSaving Time, on May 15, 2019;12, 2022;

LOGOTelephone —within the United States (“U.S.”) or Canada, call the toll-free telephone number shown on the proxy card and follow the instructions at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight SavingsSaving Time, on May 15, 2019;12, 2022; or

LOGOMail —if you receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, complete, sign and date the proxy card and return the proxy card in the prepaid envelope. Your proxy card must be received by the Company before the voting polls close atduring the Annual Meeting.

If you vote by internet or telephone, do not return your proxy card. The telephone and internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders’shareholders’ identities, to allow stockholdersshareholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders’shareholders’ instructions have been recorded properly.

Submitting your proxy by internet or telephone will not affect your right to vote in person online should you decide to attend the Annual Meeting.

If you want to vote in person atonline during the meeting, you must requesthave a ballot. For directions to thecontrol number and access our Annual Meeting visitat www.sterlingmccalllexus.comwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPI2022and click on the Hours and Map link.

.

If you hold your shares in street name, you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee describing how to vote your shares. Beneficial owners voting by telephone or internet are subject to the same deadlines as described above for holders of record. If you want to vote in person, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee and bring ituse the information provided on the legal proxy to access the meeting.Annual Meeting.

 

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  70

Can


Proxy Statement 2022  |  71

CAN I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

CHANGE MY VOTE OR REVOKE MY PROXY?

If you are a stockholdershareholder of record on the record date, you can revoke your proxy prior to the completion of voting atduring the Annual Meeting by:

 

delivering an executed, later-dated proxy that is received by the Corporate Secretary of the Company before the voting polls close at the Annual Meeting;
resubmitting your proxy by internet or telephone at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Savings Time, on May  15, 2019;
delivering a written notice of revocation of the proxy to Beth Sibley, Corporate Secretary, Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77024 no later than May 15, 2019; or
voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

delivering an executed, later-dated proxy that is received by the Corporate Secretary of the Company before the voting polls close during the Annual Meeting;

 

resubmitting your proxy by internet or telephone at any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Saving Time, on May 17, 2022;

delivering a written notice of revocation of the proxy to Beth Sibley, Corporate Secretary, Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77024 no later than May 17, 2022; or

voting in person online during the Annual Meeting.

Only your latest dated proxy that we receive prior to the Annual Meeting will be counted. Further, your attendance atduring the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy.

If you are a street name stockholdershareholder you must follow the instructions of your broker, bank or other nominee to revoke your voting instructions. You may also vote in person atonline during the Annual Meeting if you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee.

What is the effect of broker non-votes and abstentions and what vote is required to approve each proposal?

WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF BROKER NON-VOTES AND ABSTENTIONS AND WHAT VOTE IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE EACH PROPOSAL?

If you hold your shares in street name, you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee describing how to vote your shares. If you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares, they may vote your shares as they decide as to each routine matter under the rules of the NYSE. Only Proposal No. 3 is considered a “routine” matter.

If you do not provide specific voting instructions to your broker on non-routine matters, your broker may not cast a vote on the proposal, resulting in a broker non-vote. Although any broker non-vote would be counted as present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, it would be treated as not entitled to vote with respect to “non- routine”“non-routine” matters. If you are a beneficial owner holding shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and you do not provide voting instructions on certain matters, your broker may cast a vote on your behalf for Proposal No. 3, but may not cast a vote on Proposals No. 1 or 2. Abstentions occur when stockholdersshareholders are present atduring the Annual Meeting but fail to vote or voluntarily withhold their vote for any of the matters upon which the stockholdersshareholders are voting.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  70

The table below describes the vote required for approval of each matter to be brought before the meeting, as well as the treatment of abstentions and broker non-votes as to each matter.

 

Proposal
 Vote Required

Proposal

  Treatment of
AbstentionsVote Required
  Treatment of
Abstentions
Treatment
of Broker
Non-Votes

1

  Each nominee must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast by stockholdersshareholders entitled to vote in the election of directors. Nominees who receive more “for” votes than “against” votes are elected, subject to our director resignation policy described below  No Effect  Not taken into account

2

  The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person online or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter  Count as a vote “against”  Not taken into account

3

  The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person online or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter  Count as a vote “against”  Brokers have discretion

The Company’sWe have adopted a majority vote director resignation policy, requires any director nominee in an uncontested election who receives a greater number of votes “against” than votes “for” his or her election to tender his or her resignation promptly following the certification of the election results. The Nominating/Governance Committee of the Board will consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances and make a recommendation to the Board with respect to whether to accept the resignation. Within 90 days, the Boardwhich is required to take action with respect to the recommendation and to promptly disclose its decision. The director resignation policy is more fully described in “Information about Our Board of Directors and Its Committees — Directorgreater detail under “Director Resignation Policy.”

Our Board has appointed Earl J. Hesterberg, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and John C. Rickel,Daniel McHenry, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, as the management proxy holders for the Annual Meeting. If you are a stockholdershareholder of record, your shares will be voted by the management proxy holders in accordance with the

LOGO


LOGO

instructions on the proxy card you submit by mail, or the instructions provided for any proxy submitted by telephone or internet, as applicable. For stockholdersshareholders who have their shares voted by duly submitting a proxy by mail, telephone or internet, unless the stockholdershareholder appropriately specifies otherwise, the management proxy holders will vote all shares represented by such valid proxies as our Board recommends.

How does the Board recommend I vote?

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares“FOR” each of the director nominees;“FOR” the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of our executive compensation; and“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.

What is a quorum?

WHAT IS A QUORUM?

There must be a quorum for the Annual Meeting to be held. A quorum will be present if the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote are present in person online or represented by proxy atduring the Annual Meeting. Our independent inspector of election, Broadridge Financial Solutions, will determine whether or not a quorum is present. There must be a quorum for the Annual Meeting to be held. Proxies received but marked as abstentions or broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of votes considered to be present atduring the Annual Meeting.

If less than a quorum is represented at the meeting, the chairmanChair of the meeting or a majority of the shares so represented may adjourn the meeting from time to time without further notice, and the persons named as proxies will vote the proxies they have been authorized atduring the Annual Meeting in favor of such an adjournment.

In the event a quorum is present atduring the Annual Meeting but sufficient votes to approve any of the items proposed by our Board have not been received, the persons named as proxies may propose one or more adjournments of the meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies. A stockholdershareholder vote may be taken on one or more of the proposals in this proxy statement prior to such adjournment if sufficient proxies have been received and it is otherwise appropriate. If a quorum is present, the persons named as proxies will vote the proxies they have been authorized to vote on any other business properly brought before the meeting in favor of such an adjournment. If a quorum is initially established, but sufficient stockholdersshareholders withdraw such that the meeting is left with less than a quorum, the remaining stockholdersshareholders present atduring the meeting may continue to transact business until the meeting is adjourned or recessed.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  71

Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting?

WHO WILL BEAR THE COST OF SOLICITING VOTES FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING?

We have engaged Alliance Advisors to assist with the solicitation of proxies for a fee not to exceed $5,500,$6,000, plus reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. We will bear all expenses of soliciting proxies. We may reimburse brokerage firms, custodians, nominees, fiduciaries and other persons representing beneficial owners of our common stock for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners. Directors, officers and employees of Group 1 may also solicit proxies in person or by other means of communication. Such directors, officers and employees will not be additionally compensated but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation.

Who will count the votes?

WHO WILL COUNT THE VOTES?

We have engaged Broadridge Financial Solutions to tabulate the votes and to serve as inspector of election atduring the Annual Meeting for a fee of approximately $3,500. Broadridge will separately tabulate “For,” “Against” and “Withhold” votes, abstentions and broker non-votes. Broadridge will also certify the election results and perform any other acts required by the Delaware General Corporation Law.

 

May I propose actions for consideration at next year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders or nominate individuals to serve as directors?

You may submit proposals for consideration at future stockholder meetings, including director nominations. Please read “Stockholder Proposals for 2020 Annual Meeting” for information regarding the submission of stockholder proposals and director nominations for consideration at next year’s Annual Meeting.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  72


Back to Contents

LOGO

Proxy Statement 2022  |  73

StockholderShareholder Proposals for 2020 2023

Annual Meeting

 

Pursuant to the various rules promulgated by the SEC, stockholdersshareholders interested in submitting a proposal for inclusion in our proxy materials and for presentation at the 20202023 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders may do so by following the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. In general, to be eligible for inclusion in our proxy materials, stockholdershareholder proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary no later than December 13, 20192022 and meet the requirements of Rule 14a-8. No stockholdershareholder proposal was received for inclusion in this proxy statement.

As more specifically provided for in our Bylaws, in order for a nomination of persons for election to our Board or a proposal of business (other than through Rule 14a-8) to be properly brought before our Annual Meeting of Stockholders,Shareholders, it must be either specified in the notice of the meeting given by our Corporate Secretary or otherwise brought before the meeting by or at the direction of our Board or by a stockholdershareholder entitled to vote and who complies with the notice procedures set forth in our Bylaws. Subject to the exception described below, a stockholdershareholder making a nomination for election to our Board or a proposal of business for the 20202023 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders must deliver proper notice to our Corporate Secretary no earlier than the close of business 120 days and no later than the close of business 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Shareholders. In other words, for a stockholdershareholder nomination for election to our Board or a proposal of business to be considered at the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,Shareholders, it should be properly submitted to our Corporate Secretary no earlier than the close of business January 17, 202018, 2023 and no later than the close of business February 16, 2020.17, 2023. However, in the event that the date of an Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the anniversary date of the preceding year’s Annual Meeting, the stockholdershareholder notice must be delivered not earlier than 120 days prior to such Annual Meeting and not later than 90 days prior to such Annual Meeting or, if the first public announcement of the date of such Annual Meeting is less than 100 days prior to the date of such Annual Meeting, the 10thday following the day on which public announcement of the date of such Annual Meeting is first made by the Company.

If we increase the number of directors to be elected at an Annual Meeting and do not make a public announcement naming all of the nominees for director and specifying the size of the increased Board at least 80 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s Annual Meeting, a stockholder’sshareholder’s notice regarding the nominees for the new positions created by the increase will be considered timely if it is delivered to our Corporate Secretary not later than the close of business on the 10thday following the day on which the public announcement is first made.

For each individual that a stockholdershareholder proposes to nominate as a director or propose other business (other than through Rule 14a-8) at the 20202023 Annual Meeting, the stockholder’sshareholder’s written notice to our Corporate Secretary must include the information required by and meet the detailed requirements set forth in our Bylaws. From time to time, the Nominating/GovernanceGCR Committee may request additional information from the nominee or the stockholder.shareholder.

LOGO


LOGO

2021 Annual Report

 

2018 Annual Report

A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, including the financial statements and the financial statement schedules, if any, but not including exhibits, will be furnished at no charge to each person to whom a proxy statement is delivered or made available upon the written request of such person addressed to 800 Gessner, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77024, Attn: Corporate Secretary.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  73

Householding

HOUSEHOLDING

We may send a single set of proxy materials, as applicable, and other stockholdershareholder communications to any household at which two or more stockholdersshareholders with the same last name reside, unless we have received contrary instructions from those stockholders.shareholders. This process is called “householding.” This reduces duplicate mailings and saves printing and postage costs as well as natural resources. The proxy materials and other stockholdershareholder communications may be householded based on your prior express or implied consent. StockholdersShareholders who participate in householding will continue to have access to and utilize separate proxy voting instructions.

If you wish to opt out of householding, and would like to have separate copies of the proxy materials mailed to each stockholdershareholder sharing your address, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive a single copy, please contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., by calling 1-800-542-1061 or by writing Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. Broadridge will promptly deliver the requested materials. Beneficial owners (street name stockholders)shareholders) sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of the proxy materials, and other stockholdershareholder communications and who wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future will need to contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of such materials be mailed to all stockholdersshareholders at the shared address in the future.

However, please note that if you want to receive a paper proxy card or other proxy materials for purposes of this year’s meeting, you should follow the instructions included in the information that was sent to you.

Other Matters

OTHER MATTERS

As of the date of filing this proxy statement, our Board is not aware of any other business or nominee to be presented or voted upon atduring the Annual Meeting. If any other business or nominee is properly presented, the proxies solicited by our Board will provide the proxy holders with the authority to vote on those matters and nominees in accordance with such persons’ discretion. Where a stockholdershareholder has appropriately specified how a proxy is to be voted, it will be voted by the proxy holders in accordance with the specification.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

 

Beth Sibley

Corporate Secretary

 

2019 PROXY STATEMENT  
LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  74


LOGO

Proxy Statement 2022  |  75

Appendix A — Non-GAAP Financial

Measures

In addition to reporting our financial information in our Annual Report on Form 10-K using U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), certain non-GAAP financial measures are used with respect to our annual incentive compensation and to evaluate the Company’s financial performance. Such non-GAAP financial measures include (i) adjusted operating cash flow, (ii) adjusted EPS, and (iii) adjusted net income, each of which are described further below. The Company does not intend for the information to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the related GAAP financial measures. Other companies may define and calculate the measures differently than we do, limiting the usefulness of the measures for comparison with other companies.

In addition to evaluating the financial condition and results of our operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP, from time to time our management evaluates and analyzes results and any impact on the Company of strategic decisions and actions relating to, among other things, cost reduction, growth, profitability improvement initiatives, and other events outside of normal, or “core,” business and operations, by considering alternative financial measures not prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In our evaluation of results from time to time, we exclude items that do not arise directly from core operations, such as non-cash asset impairment charges, out-of-period adjustments, legal matters, gains and losses on dealership franchise or real estate transactions, and catastrophic events, such as hailstorms, hurricanes, and snow storms. Because these non-core charges and gains materially affect the Company’s financial condition or results in the specific period in which they are recognized, management also evaluates, and makes resource allocation and performance evaluation decisions based on, the related non-GAAP measures excluding such items. This includes evaluating measures such as adjusted selling, general and administrative expenses, adjusted net income, adjusted diluted earnings per share, and constant currency. These adjusted measures are not measures of financial performance under U.S. GAAP, but are instead considered non-GAAP financial performance measures. Non-GAAP measures do not have definitions under U.S. GAAP and may be defined differently by, and not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by, other companies. As a result, any non-GAAP financial measures considered and evaluated by management are reviewed in conjunction with a review of the most directly comparable measures calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on such non-GAAP measures, but also to consider them with the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures.

In addition to using such non-GAAP measures to evaluate results in a specific period, management believes that such measures may provide more complete and consistent comparisons of operational performance on a period-over-period historical basis and a better indication of expected future trends. Our management also uses these adjusted measures in conjunction with U.S. GAAP financial measures to assess our business, including communication with our Board of Directors, investors, and industry analysts concerning financial performance. We disclose these non-GAAP measures, and the related reconciliations, because we believe investors use these metrics in evaluating longer-term period-over-period performance, and to allow investors to better understand and evaluate the information used by management to assess operating performance. The exclusion of certain expenses in the calculation of non-GAAP financial measures should not be construed as an inference that these costs are unusual or infrequent. We anticipate excluding these expenses in the future presentation of our non-GAAP financial measures.

In addition, we evaluate our results of operations on both an as reported and a constant currency basis. The constant currency presentation, which is a non-GAAP measure, excludes the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We believe providing constant currency information provides valuable supplemental information regarding our underlying business and results of operations, consistent with how we evaluate our performance. We calculate constant currency percentages by converting our current period reported results for entities reporting in currencies other than U.S. dollars using comparative period exchange rates rather than the actual exchange rates in effect during the respective periods. The constant currency performance measures

LOGO


LOGO

should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, the measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Same Store amounts presented include the results of dealerships for the identical months in each period presented in comparison, commencing with the first full month in which the dealership was owned by us and, in the case of dispositions, ending with the last full month it was owned by us. Same Store results also include the activities of our corporate headquarters.

Certain amounts in the financial statements may not compute due to rounding. All computations have been calculated using unrounded amounts for all periods presented.

RECONCILIATION OF CERTAIN NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES — CONSOLIDATED

(Unaudited)

(In millions, except per share data)

  
   Year Ended December 31, 2021 
    U.S.
GAAP
  Loss on
interest
rate swaps
  Catastrophic
events
  Dealership
and real
estate
transactions
  Acquisition
costs
  Legal
matters
  Asset
impairments
  Tax rate
changes
  Non-GAAP
adjusted
 

SG&A expenses

  $1,477.2  $  $(2.8 $4.4  $(13.4 $5.3  $  $  $1,470.7 

Asset impairments

  $1.7  $  $  $  $  $  $(1.7 $  $ 

Income (loss) from operations

  $884.4  $  $2.8  $(4.4 $13.4  $(5.3 $1.7  $  $892.6 

Floorplan interest expense

  $27.6  $(4.8 $  $  $  $  $  $  $22.9 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  $800.9  $4.8  $2.8  $(4.4 $13.4  $(5.3 $1.7  $  $813.9 

Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes

   175.5   1.1   0.6   (1.0  3.0   (1.2  0.4   1.9   180.3 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   625.4   3.7   2.2   (3.4  10.5   (4.2  1.3   (1.9  633.7 

Less: Earnings (loss) allocated to participating securities

   21.0   0.1   0.1   (0.1  0.4   (0.1     (0.1  21.3 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations available to diluted common shares

  $604.4  $3.6  $2.1  $(3.3 $10.1  $(4.0 $1.3  $(1.8 $612.4 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations

  $34.11  $0.20  $0.12  $(0.19 $0.57  $(0.23 $0.07  $(0.10 $34.55 

Effective tax rate

   21.9         22.1

SG&A as % gross profit1

   60.5         60.3

Operating margin2

   6.6         6.6

Pretax margin3

   5.9         6.0

Same Store SG&A expenses

  $1,415.9  $  $(2.8 $2.1  $(13.4 $5.3  $  $  $1,407.1 

Same Store SG&A as %
gross profit1

   60.2         59.9

Same Store income (loss) from operations

  $858.0  $  $2.8  $(2.1 $13.4  $(5.3 $1.7  $  $868.5 

Same Store operating margin2

   6.6         6.7

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  76


Proxy Statement 2022  |  77

    
    U.S.
GAAP
  Non-GAAP
adjustments
   Non-GAAP
adjusted
 

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

  $(73.3 $81.8   $8.5 

Less: (loss) earnings allocated to participating securities

   (2.5  2.8    0.3 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations available to diluted common shares

  $(70.9 $79.1   $8.2 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $552.1  $90.0   $642.1 

Less: earnings allocated to participating securities

   18.5   3.0    21.6 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income available to diluted common shares

  $533.6  $87.0   $620.6 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share from discontinued operations

  $(4.00 $4.47   $0.46 

Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations

   34.11   0.45    34.55 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share

  $30.11  $4.91   $35.02 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
Back to Contents1

Adjusted SG&A as % of gross profit excludes the impact of SG&A reconciling items above.

2

Adjusted operating margin excludes the impact of SG&A reconciling items above and asset impairment charges.

3

Adjusted pretax margin excludes the impact of SG&A reconciling items above, asset impairment charges and a loss on interest rate swaps.

RECONCILIATION OF CERTAIN NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES — CONSOLIDATED

(Unaudited)

(In millions, except per share data)

  
   Year Ended December 31, 2020 
   U.S.
GAAP
  Dealership
and real
estate
transactions
  Severance
costs
  Legal
matters
  

Out-of-

period
adjustment

  Asset
impairments
  Loss on
extinguishment
of debt
  Non-GAAP
adjusted
 

SG&A expenses

  $1,138.2  $5.3  $(1.2 $2.7  $(10.6 $  $  $1,134.5 

Asset impairments

  $26.7  $  $  $  $  $(26.7 $  $ 

Income (loss) from operations

  $495.7  $(5.3 $1.2  $(2.7 $10.6  $26.7  $  $526.1 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

  $13.7  $  $  $  $  $  $(13.7 $ 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  $380.8  $(5.3 $1.2  $(2.7 $10.6  $26.7  $13.7  $424.9 

Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes

   84.2   (1.1  0.2   (0.6  0.8   5.5   3.0   92.0 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

   296.7   (4.2  1.0   (2.1  9.7   21.2   10.7   333.0 

Less: Earnings (loss) allocated to participating securities

   10.6   (0.2     (0.1  0.3   0.8   0.4   11.9 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations available to diluted common shares

  $286.0  $(4.0 $1.0  $(2.1 $9.4  $20.4  $10.3  $321.0 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations

  $16.06  $(0.23 $0.05  $(0.12 $0.53  $1.15  $0.58  $18.03 

Effective tax rate

   22.1        21.6

SG&A as % gross profit1

   65.6        65.4

Operating margin2

   4.7        5.0

Pretax margin3

   3.6        4.0

Same Store SG&A expenses

  $1,123.3  $  $(1.2 $2.7  $(10.6 $  $  $1,114.2 

Same Store SG&A as % gross profit1

   65.7        65.1

Same Store income (loss) from operations

  $493.8  $  $1.2  $(2.7 $10.6  $21.9  $  $524.7 

Same Store operating margin2

   4.7        5.0

LOGO


LOGO

    
    U.S.
GAAP
  Non-GAAP
adjustments
   Non-GAAP
adjusted
 

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

  $(10.2 $10.8   $0.6 

Less: (loss) earnings allocated to participating securities

   (0.4  0.4     
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations available to diluted common shares

  $(9.8 $10.4   $0.6 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $286.5  $47.1   $333.5 

Less: earnings allocated to participating securities

   10.3   1.7    12.0 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income available to diluted common shares

  $276.2  $45.4   $321.6 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share from discontinued operations

  $(0.55 $0.58   $0.03 

Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations

   16.06   1.97    18.03 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share

  $15.51  $2.55   $18.06 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
1

Adjusted SG&A as % of gross profit excludes the impact of SG&A reconciling items above.

2

Adjusted operating margin excludes the impact of SG&A reconciling items above and asset impairment charges.

3

Adjusted pretax margin excludes the impact of SG&A reconciling items above, asset impairment charges and a loss on extinguishment of debt.

The following table reconciles cash flows on a GAAP basis to the corresponding adjusted amounts (in millions):

  
   

Years

Ended
December 31,

 
    2021  2020 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

   

Net cash provided by operating activities:

  $1,259.6  $805.4 

Change in Floorplan notes payable — credit facility and other, excluding floorplan offset and net acquisitions and dispositions

   (491.5  (313.7

Change in Floorplan notes payable — manufacturer affiliates associated with net acquisitions and dispositions and floorplan offset activity

   (12.7  12.0 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted net cash provided by operating activities

  $755.5  $503.7 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

   

Net cash used in investing activities:

  $(1,251.7 $(74.7

Change in cash paid for acquisitions, associated with Floorplan notes payable

   137.9    

Change in proceeds from disposition of franchises, property and equipment, associated with Floorplan notes payable

   (7.0  (8.6
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted net cash used in investing activities

  $(1,120.8 $(83.3
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

   

Net cash used in financing activities:

  $(74.0 $(668.1

Change in Floorplan notes payable, excluding floorplan offset

   373.2   310.3 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  $299.2  $(357.8
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LOGOProxy Statement 2022  |  78


LOGO


 

    LOGO

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

800 GESSNER ROAD
SUITE 500
HOUSTON, TX 77024

 

    LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 17, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
During The Meeting - Go towww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPI2022
You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on May 17, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — —

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

LOGO

  For  

All

Withhold

All

For All

Except

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

    ☐☐  
1.Election of Directors
Nominees:
01)  Carin M. Barth02)  Earl J. Hesterberg03)  Steven C. Mizell04)  Lincoln Pereira Filho05)  Stephen D. Quinn
06)  Steven P. Stanbrook07)  Charles L. Szews08)  Anne Taylor09)  MaryAnn Wright
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.    ForAgainstAbstain  
2.Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation.    ☐☐  
3.Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.    ☐☐  
NOTE: In their discretion, such attorney-in-fact and proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]            Date

                    Signature (Joint Owners)

                                         Date

 


Back to Contents

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 are available at

www.proxyvote.com

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

LOGO

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS - MAY 18, 2022

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby revokes all prior proxies and appoints Earl J. Hesterberg and Daniel McHenry, and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution, to represent and to vote all shares of common stock of Group 1 Automotive, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 18, 2022 at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Saving Time, virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPI2022, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, on any matter properly coming before the meeting, and specifically the matters described on the reverse side hereof.

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned. If no direction is given, this proxy will be voted FOR the nominees set forth in proposal 1, FOR proposal 2 and FOR proposal 3. This proxy also delegates discretionary authority to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please see the accompanying proxy statement for additional details.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side